/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Consider the population of all u... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider the population of all undergraduate students at your university. A certain proportion have an interest in graduate studies. Your friend randomly samples 40 undergraduates and uses the sample proportion of those who have an interest in graduate studies to predict the population proportion at the university. You conduct an independent study of a random sample of 40 undergraduates and find the sample proportion of those are interested in graduate studies. For these two statistical studies, a. Are the populations the same? b. How likely is it that the samples are the same? Explain. c. How likely is it that the sample proportions are equal? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Yes, the populations are the same. b. It is unlikely the samples are the same. c. It is unlikely the sample proportions are exactly equal, due to random variation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Populations

The populations in both studies are students from the same university. Thus, the population for both studies is the same: all undergraduate students at the university.
02

Analyzing the Samples

Each study collects a random sample of 40 undergraduates from the university. The methods of sampling suggest independence, meaning each sample could be different, though they use the same sampling strategy from the same population.
03

Comparing the Samples

Since both studies use random sampling, the samples may or may not contain the exact same individuals. With random sampling, there is a low probability that both samples contain the exact same 40 students.
04

Exploring Sample Proportions

The sample proportion is a statistic calculated from a sample that estimates a population parameter. While both studies calculate this proportion from independent samples of the same size, random variation in the samples can cause the sample proportions to differ slightly.
05

Conclusion on Sample Proportions

Although both studies use the same sampling strategy, the likelihood that the sample proportions are exactly equal is low due to random sampling variation. The proportions might be close but unlikely identical.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Population in Statistical Studies
Whenever we discuss a population in the realm of statistics, we are referring to the entire group or set from which data might be collected. In the context of the exercise, this population comprises all undergraduate students at the university. This is the complete set of individuals that your study and your friend's study aim to understand and describe.

Population is critical as it forms the ground base for sampling and analysis. It contains all individuals you are interested in and forms the basis for deciding on the sample size and methods.

Even though each study is conducted independently, as long as they aim to understand all undergraduate students at the university, the population remains the same in both studies. Therefore, it acts as a constant frame of reference for your research findings.
The Role of Random Sampling
Random sampling is a crucial part of acquiring unbiased data from a population. It involves selecting individuals for the sample from the total population such that each individual has an equal chance of being chosen.

Here's why random sampling is beneficial:
  • It helps in achieving a representative sample, which means the findings can be more confidently generalized to the whole population.
  • It reduces sampling bias, ensuring that the sample closely mirrors the broader population in terms of variability and central tendencies.
This method, however, does not guarantee identical samples. Even when you and your friend both sample 40 students, random sampling's inherent randomness makes it quite unlikely that the exact same students will be chosen in both cases.

Random sampling therefore relies on luck and probabilistic outcomes but is powerful in ensuring high levels of neutrality and applicability in sampling.
Understanding Sample Proportion
A sample proportion is used in statistics to estimate the true proportion of a characteristic within a population. It is a statistic derived from the sample data, and it acts as an estimator of the population proportion.

The formula for sample proportion ( heta) is given by:
\[\hat{p} = \frac{x}{n}\]
where:
  • \(\hat{p}\) is the sample proportion,
  • \(x\) is the number of individuals in the sample with the specific characteristic,
  • and \(n\) is the total number of individuals in the sample.
In our studies, we use the sample proportion to estimate how many students are interested in graduate studies out of the sampled undergraduates.

Because there is random variation in sampling, the sample proportion may not exactly match the population proportion or even between independent studies of the same size. Small differences could arise because each random sample, due to its inherent variability, could slightly differ in demographic or interest representation. Hence, the likelihood that two independently drawn sample proportions are identical is low.

Understanding these nuances in statistical sampling helps to better appreciate and interpret sample proportions' reliability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An analysis by Professor Peter M Rothwell and his colleagues (Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK) published in 2012 in the medical journal The Lancet (http://www. thelancet.com) assessed the effects of daily aspirin intake on cancer mortality. They looked at individual patient data from 51 randomized trials \((77,000\) participants) of daily intake of aspirin versus no aspirin or other anti-platelet agents. According to the authors, aspirin reduced the incidence of cancer, with maximum benefit seen when the scheduled duration of trial treatment was five years or more and resulted in a relative reduction in cancer deaths of about \(15 \%\) (562 cancer deaths in the aspirin group versus 664 cancer deaths in the Control group). Specify the aspect of this study that pertains to (a) design, (b) description, and (c) inference.

A study published in 2010 in The New England Journal of Medicine investigated the effect of financial incentives on smoking cessation. As part of the study, 878 employees of a company, all of whom were smokers, were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group (442 employees) was to receive information about smoking cessation programs; the other ( 436 employees) was to receive that same information as well as a financial incentive to quit smoking. The outcome of interest of the study was smoking cessation status six months after the initial cessation was reported. After implementation of the program, \(14.7 \%\) of individuals in the financial incentive group reported cessation six months after the initial report, compared to \(5.0 \%\) of the information-only group. Assume that the observed difference in cessation rates between the groups \((14.7 \%-5.0 \%=9.7 \%)\) is statistically significant. a. What does it mean to be statistically significant? (choose the best option from (i)-(iv)) i. The financial option was offered to \(9.7 \%\) more smokers in the study than the nonsmokers who were employees of the company. ii. \(9.7 \%\) was calculated using statistical techniques. iii. If there were no true impact of the financial incentive, the observed difference of \(9.7 \%\) is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. iv. We know that if the financial incentive were given to all smokers, \(9.7 \%\) would quit smoking. b. Is the difference between the groups attributable to the financial incentive?

The Institute for Public Opinion Research at Florida International University has conducted the FIU/Florida Poll (www2 .fiu.edu/orgs/ipor/globwarm2.htm) of about 1200 Floridians annually since 1988 to track opinions on a wide variety of issues. In 2006 the poll asked, "How concerned are you about the problem of global warming?" The possible responses were very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned, and haven't heard about it. The poll reported percentages (44,30,21,6) in these categories. a. Identify the sample and the population. b. Are the percentages quoted statistics or parameters? Why?

Data file for friends Construct (by hand) a data file of the form of Figure 1.2 , for two characteristics with a sample of four of your friends. One characteristic should take numerical values, and the other should take values that are categories.

Multiple choice: Use of inferential statistics? Inferential statistics are used a. to describe whether a sample has more females or males. b. to reduce a data file to easily understood summaries. c. to make predictions about populations by using sample data. d. when we can't use statistical software to analyze data. e. to predict the sample data we will get when we know the population.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.