/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 67 Obesity in metro areas \(\quad\)... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Obesity in metro areas \(\quad\) A Gallup poll tracks obesity in the United States for the most and least obese metro areas in the United States. The poll, based on more than 200,000 responses between January and December of 2010 , reported that certain chronic conditions are more prevalent in the most obese metro areas. The table that follows presents a summary of the findings. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \begin{array}{c} \mathbf{1 0} \text { Most Obese } \\ \text { Metro Areas } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \mathbf{1 0} \text { Least Obese } \\ \text { Metro Areas } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Diabetes } & 14.6 \% & 8.5 \% \\ \text { High blood pressure } & 35.8 \% & 25.6 \% \\ \text { High cholesterol } & 28.5 \% & 24.1 \% \\ \text { Heart attack } & 5.9 \% & 3.4 \% \end{array} $$ a. Are we able to conclude from the Gallup poll that obesity causes a higher incidence of these conditions? b. What is a possible variable other than obesity that may be associated with these chronic conditions?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. No definitive causation can be concluded from the data. b. Socioeconomic status or lifestyle could be associated with these conditions.

Step by step solution

01

Assessing Causality from Data

Review the provided percentages for chronic health conditions in the most and least obese metro areas. Note that the higher percentages in the most obese areas suggest a correlation, but this information alone does not provide evidence of a causal relationship between obesity and these conditions. Causal links require controlled studies that rule out other contributing factors.
02

Considering Alternative Explanations

Consider that factors such as lifestyle, socioeconomic status, diet, and healthcare access could contribute to both obesity and these chronic conditions. These are confounding variables that might explain or contribute to the observed differences without implying a direct causation.
03

Identifying Other Associated Variables

Enumerate potential variables other than obesity that might be linked to the chronic conditions listed. Examples include socioeconomic factors (e.g., income, education), environmental influences (e.g., urban vs. rural living), or genetic predispositions that impact health outcomes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Causality vs Correlation
When we see patterns and connections in data, it's natural to wonder: do these findings show a cause-and-effect relationship? In statistics, distinguishing between causality and correlation is crucial. Imagine looking at the Gallup poll data about obesity in metro areas. The data indicates that places with higher obesity rates also tend to have more people suffering from chronic conditions like heart attacks, diabetes, and high blood pressure. This relationship is a correlation. However, correlation alone doesn’t mean obesity is directly causing these conditions. To claim a causal link — that obesity directly increases the risk of these health issues — researchers would need controlled studies. Such experiments help to rule out other factors that could be at play. Simply put, while the data reveals that obesity and chronic health conditions often occur together, it doesn't pinpoint obesity as the cause. Always remember, correlation considers relationships between variables, while causality establishes one variable's effect on another.
Confounding Variables
Confounding variables are factors that might muddy the waters when trying to understand the relationship between two other variables. In our metro area example, while examining the connection between obesity and conditions like diabetes, many other aspects come into play. These are the confounding variables. Consider the role of:
  • Socioeconomic status - people with lower income might have limited access to healthy foods or medical care.
  • Lifestyle choices - such as lack of exercise, smoking, and poor diet.
  • Access to healthcare - differences in healthcare access can influence the prevalence of chronic conditions.
These factors could lead to both higher obesity rates and greater prevalence of chronic conditions, even if they are not directly linked. Addressing confounding variables involves recognizing that many aspects influence health, beyond just one factor like obesity.
Chronic Health Conditions
Chronic health conditions are persistent and long-lasting in their effects, often with impacts lasting for years or even a lifetime. Obesity is often linked to several chronic conditions highlighted in the Gallup poll. Let's break down some common ones:
  • Diabetes: A condition characterized by high blood sugar levels over a prolonged period. It is often complicated by obesity, particularly Type 2 diabetes.
  • High Blood Pressure (Hypertension): This condition makes the heart work harder to pump blood, increasing the risk of heart issues. Obesity can be a significant risk factor.
  • High Cholesterol: Too much fatty substance in your blood can lead to heart disease. Linked with poor diet and lack of exercise, often prevalent in obese individuals.
  • Heart Attack: This occurs when there is a lack of blood flow to the heart. Risk increases with conditions like high blood pressure and high cholesterol, commonly associated with obesity.
Understanding these conditions helps highlight why addressing obesity is important, but remember, it involves considering the broader lifestyle and genetic factors rather than solely focusing on weight.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Aspirin prevents heart attacks? During the 1980 s approx imately 22,000 physicians over the age of 40 agreed to participate in a long-term study called the Physicians' Health Study. One question investigated was whether aspirin help to lower the rate of heart attacks. The physicians were randomly assigned to take aspirin or take placebo. a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Explain why this is an experiment, and identify the treatments. c. There are other explanatory variables, such as the amount of exercise a physician got, that we would expect to be associated with the response variable. Explain how such a variable is dealt with by the randomized nature of the experiment.

Job market for MBA students A February \(2,2003,\) Atlanta Journal Constitution article about the bleak job market for graduating MBA students described an opinion survey conducted by a graduate student at a major state university. The student polled 1500 executive recruiters, asking their opinions on the industries most likely to hire. He received back questionnaires from 97 recruiters, of whom 54 indicated that health care was the industry most likely to see job growth. a. What is the population for this survey? b. What was the intended sample size? What was the sample size actually observed? What was the percentage of nonresponse? c. Describe two potential sources of bias with this survey.

Poker as a profession? Tony's mother is extremely proud that her son will graduate college in a few months. She expresses concern, however, when Tony tells her that following graduation, he plans to move to Las Vegas to become a professional poker player. He mentions that his friend Nick did so and is now earning more than a million dollars per year. Should Tony's anecdotal evidence about Nick soothe his mother's concern?

Football discipline \(\quad\) A large southern university had problems with 17 football players being disciplined for team rule violations, arrest charges, and possible NCAA violations. The online Atlanta Journal Constitution ran a poll with the question, "Has the football coach lost control over his players?" having possible responses, "Yes, he's been too lenient," and "No, he can't control everything teenagers do." a. Was there potential for bias in this study? If so, what types of bias? b. The poll results after two days were $$ \begin{array}{lrr} \hline \text { Yes } & 6012 & 93 \% \\ \text { No } & 487 & 7 \% \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Smoking and heart attacks A Reuters story (April 2,2003) reported that "The number of heart attack victims fell by almost \(60 \%\) at one hospital six months after a smoke-free ordinance went into effect in the area (Helena, Montana), a study showed, reinforcing concerns about second-hand smoke." The number of hospital admissions for heart attack dropped from just under seven per month to four a month during the six months after the smoking ban. a. Did this story describe an experiment or an observational study? b. In the context of this study, describe how you could explain to someone who has never studied statistics that association does not imply causation. For instance, give a potential reason that could explain this association.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.