/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 Is there a relationship between ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Is there a relationship between how many sit-ups you can do and how fast you can run 40 yards? The EXCEL output shows the relationship between these variables for a study of female athletes to be discussed in Chapter 12 .a. The regression equation is \(\hat{y}=6.71-0.024 x .\) Find the predicted time in the 40 -yard dash for a subject who can do (i) 10 sit-ups, (ii) 40 sit-ups. Based on these times, explain how to sketch the regression line over this scatterplot. b. Interpret the \(y\) -intercept and slope of the equation in part a, in the context of the number of sit-ups and time for the 40 -yard dash. c. Based on the slope in part a, is the correlation positive or negative? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Predicted times: 6.47s for 10 sit-ups, 5.75s for 40 sit-ups; correlation is negative.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Regression Equation

The equation given is \( \hat{y}=6.71-0.024x \). This equation predicts the time \( \hat{y} \) in the 40-yard dash based on the number of sit-ups \( x \). The coefficient -0.024 indicates how the predicted dash time changes with each additional sit-up.
02

Predict Dash Time for 10 Sit-ups

Substitute \( x = 10 \) into the regression equation: \( \hat{y} = 6.71 - 0.024 \times 10 \). Calculate to find:\( \hat{y} = 6.71 - 0.24 = 6.47 \). The predicted 40-yard dash time for 10 sit-ups is 6.47 seconds.
03

Predict Dash Time for 40 Sit-ups

Substitute \( x = 40 \) into the regression equation: \( \hat{y} = 6.71 - 0.024 \times 40 \). Calculate to find:\( \hat{y} = 6.71 - 0.96 = 5.75 \). The predicted 40-yard dash time for 40 sit-ups is 5.75 seconds.
04

Sketch the Regression Line

To sketch the regression line, plot the points (10, 6.47) and (40, 5.75) on the scatterplot. The regression line is determined by connecting these points, showing a linear decrease in dash time as the number of sit-ups increases.
05

Interpret the Y-intercept and Slope

The \( y \)-intercept in the equation \( 6.71 \) represents the predicted 40-yard dash time when a subject does 0 sit-ups. The slope \(-0.024\) suggests that for each additional sit-up, the predicted 40-yard dash time decreases by 0.024 seconds.
06

Determine Correlation Direction

The negative slope \(-0.024\) indicates that the correlation between the number of sit-ups and the 40-yard dash time is negative, meaning as the number of sit-ups increases, the predicted dash time decreases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Regression
Linear regression is a fundamental statistical method for examining the relationship between two variables. In our exercise, the task is to find out how the number of sit-ups (independent variable, or predictor) influences the 40-yard dash time (dependent variable, or outcome). The provided regression equation is \( \hat{y} = 6.71 - 0.024x \), where \( \hat{y} \) represents the predicted dash time.

The essence of linear regression is to draw a straight line, the best fit, through the plotted data points on a graph. This line helps in predicting values of the dependent variable based on known values of the independent variable. The equation itself gives a precise mathematical relationship. The coefficient of \( x \) in the equation, here \(-0.024\), is the slope of the line. This indicates that for every additional sit-up, there's an expected reduction of 0.024 seconds in the 40-yard dash time.

Therefore, using the equation, you can plug in any number of sit-ups to find the corresponding predicted dash time.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient is a statistical measure that describes the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables. In our example, we are determining how well the number of sit-ups relates to the 40-yard dash time. Although it’s not explicitly given, the correlation coefficient can be inferred from the slope of the regression line.

When the slope is negative, as in our case with \(-0.024\), it indicates a negative correlation. This means that as the number of sit-ups increases, the time taken for the 40-yard dash tends to decrease. Conversely, if the correlation coefficient were positive, an increase in sit-ups would correspond to an increase in dash time.

Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to 1. A value close to -1 implies a strong negative correlation, a value close to 1 indicates a strong positive correlation, and a value around 0 implies no correlation. Understanding this helps to assess the predictive power of the linear regression.
Scatterplot Interpretation
A scatterplot is a type of graph used to visually represent the relationships between two variables. It helps to see patterns, trends or any potential anomalies within the data set. Each point on the scatterplot represents an observation from the data set—here, each point would indicate how many sit-ups correspond to a certain 40-yard dash time.

When interpreting a scatterplot, look for the overall pattern. A downward slope across the scatterplot, indicated by dots, suggests a negative correlation. As exhibited in our data when plotted, increasing the number of sit-ups generally decreases dash time. The regression line on this scatterplot would run diagonally from top-left to bottom-right, confirming our earlier findings.

Interpreting scatterplots is a critical skill because it provides a visual validation of the mathematical model represented by the regression equation. It also aids in spotting any outliers or unusual observations that might skew or affect the overall analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The weight (in carats) and the price (in millions of dollars) of the 9 most expensive diamonds in the world was collected from www.elitetraveler.com. Let the explanatory variable \(x=\) weight and the response variable \(y=\) price. The regression equation is \(\hat{y}=109.618+0.043 x\). a. Princie is a diamond whose weight is 34.65 carats. Use the regression equation to predict its price. b. The selling price of Princie is \(\$ 39.3\) million. Calculate the residual associated with the diamond and comment on its value in the context of the problem. c. The correlation coefficient is \(0.053 .\) Does it mean that a diamond's weight is a reliable predictor of its price?

Each month, the owner of Fay's Tanning Salon records in a data file the monthly total sales receipts and the amount spent that month on advertising. a. Identify the two variables. b. For each variable, indicate whether it is quantitative or categorical. c. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable.

Example 9 related \(y=\) team scoring (per game) and \(x=\) team batting average for American League teams. For National League teams in 2010 , \(\hat{y}=-6.25+41.5 x\). (Data available on the book's website in the NL team statistics file.) a. The team batting averages fell between 0.242 and 0.272. Explain how to interpret the slope in context. b. The standard deviations were 0.00782 for team batting average and 0.3604 for team scoring. The correlation between these variables was 0.900 . Show how the correlation and slope of 41.5 relate in terms of these standard deviations. c. Software reports \(r^{2}=0.81 .\) Explain how to interpret this measure.

Describe a situation in which it is inappropriate to use the correlation to measure the association between two quantitative variables.

In 2013, data was collected from the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. According to the collected data, the number of deaths per 100,000 individuals in the U.S would decrease by 24.45 for every 1 percentage point gain in seat belt usage. Let \(\hat{y}=\) predicted number of deaths per 100,000 individuals in 2013 and \(x=\) seat belt use rate in a given state. a. Report the slope \(b\) for the equation \(\hat{y}=a+b x\). b. If the \(y\) intercept equals \(32.42,\) then predict the number of deaths per 100,000 people in a state if (i) no one wears seat belts, (ii) \(74 \%\) of people wear seat belts (the value for Montana), (iii) \(100 \%\) of people wear seat belts.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.