/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 23 Common Sense Media surveyed 1,00... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Common Sense Media surveyed 1,000 teens and 1,000 parents of teens to learn about how teens are using social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace ("Teens Show, Tell Too Much Online," San Francisco Chronicle, August 10,2009 ). The two samples were independently selected and were chosen in a way that makes it reasonable to regard them as representative of American teens and parents of American teens. When asked if they check their online social networking sites more than 10 times a day, 220 of the teens surveyed said yes. When parents of teens were asked if their teen checks his or her site more than 10 times a day, 40 said yes. The researchers used these data to conclude that there was evidence that the proportion of all parents who think their teen checks a social networking site more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who report that they check the sites more than 10 times a day.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The researchers' conclusion is correct. The proportion of teenagers who reported checking their social networking sites more than 10 times a day (22%) is greater than the proportion of parents who believe their teen checks their social networking sites more than 10 times a day (4%).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Proportions

First, calculate the two proportions. For teens, the proportion is \(220/1000 = 0.22\) meaning 22% of teens reported frequently checking their social networking sites. Similarly for parents, the proportion is \(40/1000 = 0.04\) representing 4% of parents believe their child frequently checks their social sites.
02

Compare the Proportions

After calculating the two proportions, compare them. Here, the proportion of teens is 0.22 and the proportion of parents is 0.04. Thus, it can be observed that the proportion of teens reporting frequent use of social networking sites exceeds that of the parents' perception.
03

Conclude the Results

After the comparison, it becomes clear that the proportion of all parents who believe their teen checks a social networking site more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who report that they check their social sites more than 10 times a day. This aligns with the researchers' conclusion, meaning the researchers' conclusion was accurate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Calculation
Proportion calculation is a foundational concept in statistics that helps you compare parts of a whole.
In this exercise, proportions are used to make sense of survey data collected from teens and their parents. To compute a proportion, you must divide the number of favorable responses by the total number of respondents.
For example:
  • From 1,000 surveyed teens, 220 reported they check their social networking sites more than ten times a day. Hence, the proportion is calculated as \(\frac{220}{1000} = 0.22\), or 22%.
  • Similarly, 40 out of 1,000 parents believed their teen checks these sites more than ten times daily. The proportion here is \(\frac{40}{1000} = 0.04\), or 4%.
Calculating these proportions helps to transform raw survey results into meaningful metrics that can be more easily understood and compared.
Survey Analysis
Survey analysis involves interpreting data gathered from respondents to draw meaningful conclusions.
It is crucial in transforming numerical data into insights about people's behaviors and perceptions. In the exercise:
  • Two distinct groups (teens and parents) were surveyed, allowing researchers to compare results across different perspectives.
  • Each group's response is analyzed by calculating the proportion of affirmative answers to total surveyed individuals in that group.
  • The disparity in teens' self-reported site usage versus parents' perceptions illustrates variances in behavior awareness.
By applying survey analysis, we discern patterns and derive conclusions that validate or refute preconceived notions or hypotheses.
Data Interpretation
Data interpretation comes after calculations and comparison and helps us understand what these numbers say about real-world behaviors and attitudes.
For example, in this exercise:
  • What we see is a noticeable gap between teens' self-reported use of social networking sites and what parents perceive it to be. This hints at a communication or awareness gap.
  • The interpretation suggests that teens might engage in social media usage more than their parents would expect.
  • This interpretation can be the foundation for further research or actions, like strategies to bridge the understanding gap between parents and teens.
Effective data interpretation helps translate statistical results into actionable insights or further research questions, fueling informed decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"Want to Lose More Fat? Skip Breakfast Before Workout" (The Tribune, June 4,2010 ) is the headline of a newspaper article describing a study comparing men who did endurance training without eating before training and men who ate before training. Twenty men were assigned at random to one of two 6-week diet and exercise programs. Both groups followed a similar diet and performed the same daily morning exercise routine. Men in one group did the exercise routine prior to eating, and those in the other group ate first and then exercised. The resulting data supported the claim that those who do not eat prior to exercising burn a higher proportion of fat than those who eat before exercising. Is the inference made one that involves estimation or one that involves hypothesis testing?

Can moving their hands help children learn math? This question was investigated by the authors of the paper "Gesturing Gives Children New Ideas about Math" (Psychological Science [2009]: 267-272). A study was conducted to compare two different methods for teaching children how to solve math problems of the form \(3+2+8=-8 .\) One method involved having students point to the \(3+2\) on the left side of the equal sign with one hand and then point to the blank on the right side of the equal sign before filling in the blank to complete the equation. The other method did not involve using these hand gestures. To compare the two methods, 128 children were assigned at random to one of the methods. Each child then took a test with six problems, and the number correct was determined for each child. The researchers planned to see if the resulting data supported the theory that the mean number correct for children who use hand gestures is higher than the mean number correct for children who do not use hand gestures.

"Doctors Praise Device That Aids Ailing Hearts" (Associated Press, November 9,2004 ) is the headline of an article describing a study of the effectiveness of a fabric device that acts like a support stocking for a weak or damaged heart. People who consented to treatment were assigned at random to either a standard treatment consisting of drugs or the experimental treatment that consisted of drugs plus surgery to install the stocking. After two years, \(38 \%\) of the 57 patients receiving the stocking had improved, and \(27 \%\) of the 50 patients receiving the standard treatment had improved. The researchers used these data to determine if there was evidence to support the claim that the proportion of patients who improve is higher for the experimental treatment than for the standard treatment.

Comment on the following statement: The same statistical inference methods are used for learning from categorical data and for learning from numerical data.

Data from a poll conducted by Travelocity led to the following estimates: Approximately \(40 \%\) of travelers check their work e-mail while on vacation, about \(33 \%\) take cell phones on vacation in order to stay connected with work, and about \(25 \%\) bring laptop computers on vacation (San Luis Obispo Tribune, December 1,2005\()\). a. What additional information about the survey would you need in order to decide if it is reasonable to generalize these estimates to the population of all American adult travelers? b. Assuming that the given estimates were based on a representative sample, do you think that the estimates would more likely be closer to the actual population values if the sample size had been 100 or if the sample size had been \(500 ?\) Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.