/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 36 Two proposed computer mouse desi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Two proposed computer mouse designs were compared by recording wrist extension in degrees for 24 people who each used both mouse designs ("Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs," Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report RP7992). The difference in wrist extension was calculated by subtracting extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) from the wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) for each person. The mean difference was reported to be 8.82 degrees. Assume that this sample of 24 people is representative of the population of computer users. a. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 10 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(A\) is greater than for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) ? Use a 0.05 significance level. b. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 26 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(A\) is greater than for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) ? Use a 0.05 significance level. c. Briefly explain why different conclusions were reached in the hypothesis tests of Parts (a) and (b).

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The null hypothesis is rejected and there is evidence to support that the mean wrist extension for mouse type A is greater than mouse type B (Standard deviation = 10 degrees). b. The null hypothesis is not rejected and there is not enough evidence to support that mean wrist extension for mouse type A is greater than mouse type B (Standard deviation = 26 degrees). c. The conclusions are different due to the change in standard deviation which affects the variability in data, influencing the test results.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the null and alternative hypotheses

For this exercise, the null hypothesis \(H_0\) would state that there is no difference in the mean wrist extension for mouse type A and B. This can mathematically be expressed as \( \mu_{A} - \mu_{B} = 0 \). The alternative hypothesis \(H_1\) would state that the mean extension for mouse type A is greater than mouse type B. This can mathematically be expressed as \( \mu_{A} - \mu_{B} > 0 \). The significance level is 0.05 (or 5%), meaning there is a 5% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true.
02

Calculate the test statistic and P-value (Standard deviation 10 degrees)

First the z statistic is calculated using the formula z = (sample mean - population mean) / (standard deviation/√n). Here, the sample mean is 8.82 degrees, population mean is 0 (from null hypothesis), standard deviation is 10 degrees and n=24 (number of samples). Plugging these values, we get z ~ 1.76. Then, the P-value is looked from z table which gives us the probability that z scores will be less than our calculated z value. P-value ~ 0.039.
03

Make decision based on the P-value (Standard deviation 10 degrees)

Since the P-value is less than the significance level (0.039 < 0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected. There is enough evidence to support that the mean wrist extension for mouse type A is greater than mouse type B.
04

Calculate the test statistic and P-value (Standard deviation 26 degrees)

Now we will repeat step 2 but with the new standard deviation of 26 degrees. Again calculating, we get z ~ 0.67. From the z table, P-value ~ 0.252.
05

Make decision based on the P-value (Standard deviation 26 degrees)

Since this time the P-value is greater than the significance level (0.252 > 0.05), we cannot reject the null hypothesis. With this standard deviation, there's not enough evidence to support that the mean wrist extension for mouse type A is greater than mouse type B.
06

Analyze different conclusions in parts (a) and (b)

The reason for different conclusions in these two parts is due to the change in standard deviation. A larger standard deviation implies more variability in data which makes it harder to reject the null hypothesis. In part (a), with a smaller standard deviation, the differences are more concentrated making it easier to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a key concept in hypothesis testing. It helps us determine if the observed effect or difference is due to chance or if it is likely to be a true effect. In the context of our exercise, we set a threshold, known as the significance level, often denoted as \(\alpha\), which was 0.05 in this case, meaning there is a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is no actual difference.
For the mouse design study, we calculate a test statistic and compare the resulting probability, called a P-value, against our significance level. If the P-value is less than \(0.05\), it indicates that the observed difference in mean wrist extensions is statistically significant, suggesting that mouse type A indeed results in greater wrist extension than mouse type B, beyond what would be expected by random chance.
Therefore, statistical significance acts as a filter to help us decide what changes in data should be considered meaningful, validating our hypothesis results.
Confidence Interval
In hypothesis testing, confidence intervals provide a range of values within which we believe the true population parameter lies, with a certain level of confidence. For instance, a 95% confidence interval implies that if the experiment were repeated 100 times, the true mean difference in wrist extension would fall within this range 95 times out of 100. This gives us a sense of the estimate's reliability.
While the exercise focuses on hypothesis testing, understanding confidence intervals is vital. They give context to the mean difference of 8.82 degrees calculated for the mouse designs.
However, the specific confidence intervals weren't calculated in this exercise. But if they were, narrower intervals would imply more precise estimates, leading to stronger confidence in conclusions about mouse type A's wrist extension impact. Hence, confidence intervals complement the hypothesis test by showing the precision of our estimates.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is a measure of the amount of variation or dispersion in a set of values. It tells us how much the results differ from the average value. In this mouse design study, standard deviation plays a crucial role because it affects the test statistic and hence our conclusion about the significance of results.
For example, with a standard deviation of 10 degrees, we found a significant difference in wrist extensions between the two mouse types, rejecting the null hypothesis. However, when the standard deviation increased to 26 degrees, the results were inconclusive, as the test statistic decreased, leading to a higher P-value.
This demonstrates that larger standard deviations create more spread in the data, making it harder to confidently assert a difference in means. Thus, controlling and understanding standard deviation is essential in experiments, as it influences the reliability and outcome of statistical tests.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do female college students spend more time watching TV than male college students? This was one of the questions investigated by the authors of the paper "An Ecological Momentary Assessment of the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Patterns of University Students" (Health Education Journal [2010]: \(116-125\) ). Each student in a random sample of 46 male students at a university in England and each student in a random sample of 38 female students from the same university kept a diary of how he or she spent time over a 3 -week period. For the sample of males, the mean time spent watching TV per day was 68.2 minutes, and the standard deviation was 67.5 minutes. For the sample of females, the mean time spent watching TV per day was 93.5 minutes, and the standard deviation was 89.1 minutes. Is there convincing evidence that the mean time female students at this university spend watching \(\mathrm{TV}\) is greater than the mean time for male students? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=0.05\).

The article "Plugged In, but Tuned Out" (USA Today, January 20,2010 ) summarizes data from two surveys of kids ages 8 to 18 . One survey was conducted in 1999 and the other was conducted in \(2009 .\) Data on the number of hours per day spent using electronic media, consistent with summary quantities given in the article, are given in the following table (the actual sample sizes for the two surveys were much larger). For purposes of this exercise, assume that the two samples are representative of kids ages 8 to 18 in each of the 2 years the surveys were conducted. Construct and interpret a \(98 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the difference between the mean number of hours per day spent using electronic media in 2009 and \(1999 .\) $$ \begin{array}{llllllllllllllll} 2009 & 5 & 9 & 5 & 8 & 7 & 6 & 7 & 9 & 7 & 9 & 6 & 9 & 10 & 9 & 8 \\ 1999 & 4 & 5 & 7 & 7 & 5 & 7 & 5 & 6 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 5 & 6 & 6 \end{array} $$

Research has shown that for baseball players, good hip range of motion results in improved performance and decreased body stress. The article "Functional Hip Characteristics of Baseball Pitchers and Position Players" (The American journal of Sports Medicine, \(2010: 383-388\) ) reported on a study involving independent samples of 40 professional pitchers and 40 professional position players. For the sample of pitchers, the mean hip range of motion was 75.6 degrees and the standard deviation was 5.9 degrees, whereas the mean and standard deviation for the sample of position players were 79.6 degrees and 7.6 degrees, respectively. Assuming that these two samples are representative of professional baseball pitchers and position players, estimate the difference in mean hip range of motion for pitchers and position players using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval.

For each of the following hypothesis testing scenarios, indicate whether or not the appropriate hypothesis test would be for a difference in population means. If not, explain why not. Scenario 1: The authors of the paper "Adolescents and MP3 Players: Too Many Risks, Too Few Precautions" (Pediatrics [2009]: e953-e958) studied independent random samples of 764 Dutch boys and 748 Dutch girls ages 12 to \(19 .\) Of the boys, 397 reported that they almost always listen to music at a high volume setting. Of the girls, 331 reported listening to music at a high volume setting. You would like to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of Dutch boys who listen to music at high volume is greater than this proportion for Dutch girls. Scenario 2: The report "Highest Paying Jobs for \(2009-10\) Bachelor's Degree Graduates" (National Association of Colleges and Employers, February 2010 ) states that the mean yearly salary offer for students graduating with accounting degrees in 2010 is \(\$ 48,722\). A random sample of 50 accounting graduates at a large university resulted in a mean offer of \(\$ 49,850\) and a standard deviation of \(\$ 3,300\). You would like to determine if there is strong support for the claim that the mean salary offer for accounting graduates of this university is higher than the 2010 national average of \(\$ 48,722\). Scenario 3: Each person in a random sample of 228 male teenagers and a random sample of 306 female teenagers was asked how many hours he or she spent online in a typical week (Ipsos, January 25,2006 ). The sample mean and standard deviation were 15.1 hours and 11.4 hours for males and 14.1 and 11.8 for females. You would like to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean number of hours spent online in a typical week is greater for male teenagers than for female teenagers.

Wayne Gretzky was one of ice hockey's most prolific scorers when he played for the Edmonton Oilers. During his last season with the Oilers, Gretzky played in 41 games and missed 17 games due to injury. The article "The Great Gretzky" (Chance [1991]: 16-21) looked at the number of goals scored by the Oilers in games with and without Gretzky, as shown in the accompanying table. If you view the 41 games with Gretzky as a random sample of all Oiler games in which Gretzky played and the 17 games without Gretzky as a random sample of all Oiler games in which Gretzky did not play, is there convincing evidence that the mean number of goals scored by the Oilers is higher for games when Gretzky plays? Use \(\alpha=0.01\). $$ \begin{array}{lccc} & & \text { Sample } & \text { Sample } \\ & n & \text { Mean } & \text { sd } \\ \text { Games with Gretzky } & 41 & 4.73 & 1.29 \\ \text { Games without Gretzky } & 17 & 3.88 & 1.18 \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.