/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 In December 2001 , the Departmen... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In December 2001 , the Department of Veterans' Affairs announced that it would begin paying benefits to soldiers suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease who had served in the Gulf War (The New York Times, December 11,2001 ). This decision was based on an analysis in which the Lou Gehrig's disease incidence rate (the proportion developing the disease) for the approximately 700,000 soldiers sent to the Persian Gulf between August 1990 and July 1991 was compared to the incidence rate for the approximately 1.8 million other soldiers who were not in the Gulf during this time period. Based on these data, explain why it is not appropriate to perform a hypothesis test in this situation and yet it is still reasonable to conclude that the incidence rate is higher for Gulf War veterans than for those who did not serve in the Gulf War.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A hypothesis test may not be appropriate due to unaccounted-for factors that differ between soldiers serving in a war zone versus those who don't. These factors could significantly affect incidence rates. However, comparison of incidence rates can still be made. If the incidence rate for Gulf War veterans is significantly higher, it provides a reasonable basis for concluding that the Gulf War could be linked to a higher incidence of Lou Gehrig's disease.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Scenario

First, the details given should be comprehended. We have two groups - one group with 700,000 soldiers who served in the Gulf War, and another group of approximately 1.8 million soldiers who didn't serve in the Gulf War. Then the Lou Gehrig's disease incidence rate between these groups is observed.
02

Reason Not to Perform Hypothesis Test

Although a hypothesis test might be a popular choice in many circumstances to determine if there is a significant difference between two population proportions, in this case, it may not be appropriate. This is primarily due to several unaccounted-for factors. For instance, stress levels, environmental conditions, exposure to chemicals or substances, differences in physical exertion, amongst other variables which are quite different for soldiers serving in a war zone. A hypothesis test wouldn't account for these differences, making it unsuitable in this context.
03

Understanding Incidence Rate

Despite this, we can still make a comparison between the incidence rates. If the incidence rate (proportion of soldiers developing the disease) among the Gulf War veterans is significantly higher than that of the soldiers who did not serve in the Gulf War, it suggests that there is a link between service in the Gulf War and the development of Lou Gehrig's disease. However, more detailed study would be required to definitely prove such a causal relationship.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Lou Gehrig's Disease
Lou Gehrig's disease, also known as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects nerve cells in the brain and the spinal cord. This degeneration leads to muscle weakness, loss of motor function, and ultimately, respiratory failure. ALS is rare, with an incidence rate believed to be 1 to 2 cases per 100,000 individuals globally each year.

When discussing ALS in the context of Gulf War veterans, it is pertinent to investigate the possible increase in risk that these veterans may face. The analysis cited in the exercise indicates that there might be a higher incidence rate of ALS among Gulf War veterans compared to the general military population. Understanding the unique challenges faced by these veterans, including exposure to certain environmental conditions, could be key in unraveling the association between their service and the disease.
Gulf War Veterans
Gulf War veterans are individuals who served in the military operations during the Gulf War in 1990-1991. This group of veterans is distinctive due to their exposure to various risk factors that are not typical for the military population as a whole. These risk factors include exposure to chemical agents, environmental pollutants, and psychological stressors related to combat.

  • Potential epidemiological factors for increased disease incidence
  • Unique environmental and battle conditions they faced
  • Studies suggesting a higher prevalence of certain health issues

Given these distinct experiences, studying their health outcomes, such as the incidence of Lou Gehrig's disease, provides critical insights into the long-term effects of such exposures and stressors.
Hypothesis Test Suitability
A hypothesis test is a statistical method used to evaluate the likelihood of a hypothesis about a population parameter based on sample data. It's commonly employed to compare two sets of data and see if they differ in a statistically significant way. However, its suitability depends on several conditions being met, including a representative sample, an appropriately formulated null hypothesis, and controlled experimental variables.

In the given exercise, the complexity and variability of the factors affecting Gulf War veterans make a standard hypothesis test less suitable. This is because:
  • A hypothesis test may not fully account for confounding variables
  • The unique conditions of Gulf War service can't be replicated or controlled
  • Epidemiological studies require more comprehensive approaches than hypothesis testing alone can offer

Hence, while a hypothesis test might indicate a difference in ALS incidence rates, it would require a more robust study design to establish causality.
Epidemiological Factors
Epidemiological factors consider the patterns, causes, and effects of health and disease conditions in defined populations. These factors are crucial to understanding the spread and risk of diseases, including Lou Gehrig's disease among Gulf War veterans. The challenge in examining these factors lies in the multitude of potential influencing elements.

Some examples of these factors include:
  • Genetic predisposition
  • Age and overall health of the population
  • Environmental exposures like toxins or infectious agents
  • Lifestyle choices, such as dietary habits and smoking
  • Psychological stress and trauma

Thus, in the context of Gulf War veterans, epidemiological evidence can provide a more detailed understanding of their specific experiences and potential ALS risk, which is something a simple hypothesis test might not effectively capture.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The authors of the paper "Adolescents and MP3 Players: Too Many Risks, Too Few Precautions" (Pediatrics [2009]:e953-e958) concluded that more boys than girls listen to music at high volumes. This conclusion was based on data from independent random samples of 764 Dutch boys and 748 Dutch girls ages 12 to \(19 .\) Of the boys, 397 reported that they almost always listen to music at a high volume setting. Of the girls, 331 reported listening to music at a high volume setting. Do the sample data support the authors' conclusion that the proportion of Dutch boys who listen to music at high volume is greater than this proportion for Dutch girls? Test the relevant hypotheses using a 0.01 significance level.

The article "College Graduates Break Even by Age 33" (USA Today, September 21,2010 ) reported that \(2.6 \%\) of college graduates were unemployed in 2008 and \(4.6 \%\) of college graduates were unemployed in \(2009 .\) Suppose that the reported percentages were based on independently selected representative samples of 500 college graduates in each of these two years. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of college graduates who were unemployed in these 2 years.

Common Sense Media surveyed 1,000 teens and 1,000 parents of teens to learn about how teens are using social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace ("Teens Show, Tell Too Much Online," San Francisco Chronicle, August 10,2009 ). The two samples were independently selected and were chosen to be representative of American teens and parents of American teens. When asked if they check online social networking sites more than 10 times a day, 220 of the teens surveyed said yes. When parents of teens were asked if their teen checked networking sites more than 10 times a day, 40 said yes. Use a significance level of 0.01 to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of all parents who think their teen checks social networking sites more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who check more than 10 times a day.

"Smartest People Often Dumbest About Sunburns" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (July 19,2006\()\). The article states that "those with a college degree reported a higher incidence of sunburn than those without a high school degree-43\% versus \(25 \% . "\) Suppose that these percentages were based on independent random samples of size 200 from each of the two groups of interest (college graduates and those without a high school degree). a. Are the sample sizes large enough to use the largesample confidence interval for a difference in population proportions? b. Estimate the difference in the proportion of people with a college degree who reported sunburn and the corresponding proportion for those without a high school degree using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval. c. Is zero included in the confidence interval? What does this suggest about the difference in the two population proportions? d. Interpret the confidence interval in the context of this problem.

The report "Young People Living on the Edge" (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, 2008 ) summarizes a survey of people in two independent random samples. One sample consisted of 600 young adults (ages 19 to 35 ), and the other sample consisted of 300 parents of young adults ages 19 to \(35 .\) The young adults were presented with a variety of situations (such as getting married or buying a house) and were asked if they thought that their parents were likely to provide financial support in that situation. The parents of young adults were presented with the same situations and asked if they would be likely to provide financial support in that situation. When asked about getting married, \(41 \%\) of the young adults said they thought parents would provide financial support and \(43 \%\) of the parents said they would provide support. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of young adults who think their parents would provide financial support and the proportion of parents who say they would provide support are different.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.