/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 32 The article "Breast-Feeding Rate... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Breast-Feeding Rates Up Early" (USA Today, Sept. 14,2010 ) summarizes a survey of mothers whose babies were born in \(2009 .\) The Center for Disease Control sets goals for the proportion of mothers who will still be breast-feeding their babies at various ages. The goal for 12 months after birth is 0.25 or more. Suppose that the survey used a random sample of 1,200 mothers and that you want to use the survey data to decide if there is evidence that the goal is not being met. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of all mothers of babies born in 2009 who were still breast-feeding at 12 months. (Hint: See Example 10.10 ) a. Describe the shape, center, and spread of the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size 1,200 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.25\) is true. b. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.24\) for a sample of size 1,200 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.25\) were true? Explain why or why not. c. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.20\) for a sample of size 1,200 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.25\) were true? Explain why or why not. d. The actual sample proportion observed in the study was \(\hat{p}=0.22 .\) Based on this sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the goal is not being met, or is the observed sample proportion consistent with what you would expect to see when the null hypothesis is true? Support your answer with a probability calculation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The standard deviation is roughly 0.0128. A sample proportion of \(0.24\) is quite possible given the null hypothesis (\(p = 0.25\)), while \(0.20\) is rather surprising. The observed sample proportion of \(0.22\) provides some evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that it's not too surprising to have this sample proportion if the goal is met, but it's more likely to be observed when the actual population proportion is less than \(0.25\). This analysis does not conclusively prove that the goal is not being met, but it does provide an indication in that direction.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of Standard Deviation

The shape of the sampling distribution will be approximately normal due to the large sample size (n = 1,200). The center of the distribution will be at \(p = 0.25\) (mean = \(p\)). The spread of the sampling distribution is characterized by its standard deviation, which we can calculate using the formula \(\sigma_{\hat{p}} = \sqrt{\frac{p(1 - p)}{n}}\), where \(p\) is the proportion under the null hypothesis and \(n = 1200\). The standard deviation, \(\sigma_{\hat{p}}\) is therefore, \(\sqrt{0.25(1 - 0.25)/1200} \approx 0.0128\).
02

Would you be surprised if \(\hat{p} = 0.24\)?

Next, we calculate the Z-score for the sample proportion \(0.24\) using the formula \(Z = \frac{\hat{p} - p}{\sigma_{\hat{p}}}\). Setting \(\hat{p} = 0.24\), we get \(Z = (0.24 - 0.25)/0.0128 = -0.78\). As the z-score is within -2 to 2, the sample proportion of \(0.24\) is not surprising given the null hypothesis of \(0.25\).
03

Would you be surprised if \(\hat{p} = 0.20\)?

We repeat the previous step with \(\hat{p} = 0.20\). The z-score we get is \(Z = (0.20 - 0.25)/0.0128 = -3.91\). This z-score lies outside the range of -2 to 2, therefore, we would be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(0.20\). This suggests that if the true proportion were \(0.25\), it would be rare to observe a sample proportion of \(0.20\).
04

The sample proportion observed in the study

Finally, we need to calculate the Z-score for the sample proportion from the study, \(\hat{p} = 0.22\). This z-score is \(Z = (0.22 - 0.25)/0.0128 = -2.34\). Since this Z-score falls outside the range of -2 to 2 (though it's close), it provides some evidence against the null hypothesis. Although it's not too surprising to have this sample proportion if the goal is met, it's more likely to be observed when the actual population proportion is less than \(0.25\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sampling Distribution
When conducting a hypothesis test, the concept of a sampling distribution is crucial. Imagine you took many random samples from a population and calculated a statistic, like the sample proportion, for each of those samples. The sampling distribution is the distribution of those sample statistics.

In our case, we are looking at the sampling distribution of the sample proportion, \(\hat{p}\), with the null hypothesis \(H_0: p = 0.25\). The beautiful thing about the sampling distribution is that it is approximately normal, especially with large sample sizes like \(n = 1,200\). The center of this normal distribution is our hypothesized population proportion, \(p = 0.25\).

The spread of this distribution is determined by its standard deviation, \(\sigma_{\hat{p}}\), which we computed as \(\sqrt{\frac{0.25(1-0.25)}{1200}} \approx 0.0128\). This gives us an idea of how much individual sample proportions will vary from the expected population proportion.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance helps us determine whether the results of a hypothesis test are meaningful or could just be due to random chance. When we calculate a Z-score, we're trying to find out how far our sample proportion, \(\hat{p}\), deviates from the expected population proportion under the null hypothesis.

If this deviation is large enough, it's considered statistically significant. In simpler terms, the result is not easily explained by random chance alone. Typically, a Z-score falling outside the range of -2 to 2 suggests statistical significance, indicating that our sample result is less likely to occur if the null hypothesis is true.
Z-Score
A Z-score is a numerical measurement used in hypothesis testing to describe a value's relationship to the mean of a group of values. It's calculated by:
  • Subtracting the population mean (expected value) from the observed value
  • Dividing the result by the standard deviation
In the context of our breast-feeding survey, a Z-score helps to understand how far our sample proportion is from the hypothesized 0.25.

For example, when \(\hat{p} = 0.24\), the Z-score is calculated as \(Z = \frac{0.24 - 0.25}{0.0128} = -0.78\). A Z-score of -0.78 indicates the sample proportion is close to the mean and not statistically surprising. Conversely, \(\hat{p} = 0.20\) gives a Z-score of \(-3.91\), showing a substantial deviation from the mean, implying it's much less likely to occur if the null hypothesis is true.
Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), serves as the baseline or default assumption. It proposes that there is no significant effect or relationship, which in this scenario means the proportion of mothers still breast-feeding is truly 0.25.

The null hypothesis is what we test against. We collect data and calculate probabilities to see whether evidence is strong enough to reject it. If our sample data significantly deviates from what the null hypothesis predicts, we might claim evidence against it. However, rejecting the null doesn't prove it false; it merely suggests it's unlikely given the observed data.
Probability Calculations
Probability calculations allow us to quantify the likelihood of observing our sample result under the null hypothesis. This is essential in making informed decisions during hypothesis testing.

By calculating a Z-score and finding the corresponding probability, we can see how extreme our sample result is compared to the null hypothesis. For instance, with our observed sample proportion \(\hat{p} = 0.22\), the Z-score is \(Z = -2.34\). This corresponds to a small probability of observing such or more extreme results under \(H_0: p = 0.25\), suggesting the observed deviation is somewhat surprising. This supports a view that the true population proportion is possibly less than 0.25.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Give an example of a situation where you would not want to select a very small significance level.

The paper "I Smoke but I Am Not a Smoker" (Journal of American College Health [2010]: 117-125) describes a survey of 899 college students who were asked about their smoking behavior. Of the students surveyed, 268 classified themselves as nonsmokers, but said yes when asked later in the survey if they smoked. These students were classified as "phantom smokers," meaning that they did not view themselves as smokers even though they do smoke at times. The authors were interested in using these data to determine if there is convincing evidence that more than \(25 \%\) of college students fall into the phantom smoker category.

In a survey of 1,005 adult Americans, \(46 \%\) indicated that they were somewhat interested or very interested in having Web access in their cars (USA Today, May 1,2009 ). Suppose that the marketing manager of a car manufacturer claims that the \(46 \%\) is based only on a sample and that \(46 \%\) is close to half, so there is no reason to believe that the proportion of all adult Americans who want car Web access is less than \(0.50 .\) Is the marketing manager correct in his claim? Provide statistical evidence to support your answer. For purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be considered representative ofp adult Americans.

A survey of 1,000 adult Americans ("Military Draft Study," AP-Ipsos, June 2005 ) included the following question: "If the military draft were reinstated, would you favor or oppose drafting women as well as men?" Forty-three percent responded that they would favor drafting women if the draft were reinstated. Using the five-step process for hypothesis testing \(\left(\mathrm{HMC}^{3}\right)\) and a 0.05 significance level, determine if there is convincing evidence that less than half of adult Americansp favor drafting women.

Medical personnel are required to report suspected cases of child abuse. Because some diseases have symptoms that are similar to those of child abuse, doctors who see a child with these symptoms must decide between two competing hypotheses: \(H_{0}:\) symptoms are due to child abuse \(H_{a}:\) symptoms are not due to child abuse (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) The article "Blurred Line Between IIIness, Abuse Creates Problem for Authorities" (Macon Telegraph, February 28,2000 ) included the following quote from a doctor in Atlanta regarding the consequences of making an incorrect decision: "If it's disease, the worst you have is an angry family. If it is abuse, the other kids (in the family) are in deadly danger." a. For the given hypotheses, describe Type I and Type II errors. b. Based on the quote regarding consequences of the two kinds of error, which type of error is considered more serious by the doctor quoted? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.