/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 For each of the statistical stud... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For each of the statistical studies described, indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. The paper "Health Halos and Fast-Food Consumption" (Journal of Consumer Research [2007]: 301-314) described a study in which 46 college students volunteered to participate. Half of the students were given a coupon for a McDonald's Big Mac sandwich and the other half were given a coupon for a Subway 12 -inch Italian BMT sandwich. (For comparison, the Big Mac has 600 calories, and the Subway 12 -inch Italian BMT sandwich has 900 calories.) The researchers were interested in how the perception of Subway as a healthy fast- food choice and McDonald's as an unhealthy fast-food choice would influence what additional items students would order with the sandwich. The researchers found that those who received the Subway coupon were less likely to order a diet soft drink, more likely to order a larger size drink, and more likely to order cookies than those who received the Big Mac coupon.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The described study is an experiment, not an observational study. This is because the researchers explicitly manipulated one variable (the type of coupon given to each participant) and then observed the impact of this manipulation on additional variables (the type of additional items the participants ordered).

Step by step solution

01

Identify variables

The first step in this analysis is to identify the variables under study. Volunteers who were college students serve as the subjects of the study. The variables are the type of coupon the students received (either for a McDonald's Big Mac or a Subway 12-inch Italian BMT), and the additional items they ordered with the sandwich.
02

Determine if there is manipulation of variables

When identifying whether a study is observational or experimental, it's crucial to determine whether there has been any manipulation of the variables. In this case, the researchers manually controlled which coupon each student received - some received the Big Mac coupon, while others received the Subway 12-inch Italian BMT coupon.
03

Identify the study type

As there is a deliberate manipulation of variable (the distribution of different food coupons) and examination of its impact on other variables (ordering additional items), this study falls under the category of an experiment rather than an observational study. This is due to the fact that researchers actively intervened in the subjects' choices.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Studies
Statistical studies are a cornerstone of research in a multitude of disciplines, as they help analysts and researchers understand patterns, relationships, and effects among variables. They broadly fall into two categories, observational studies and experiments.

An observational study is where the researcher observes the subjects in a natural setting without manipulating any variables. Thus, they have no control over the variables; they simply record the data as it naturally occurs. On the contrary, an experiment involves the deliberate manipulation of variables to observe the effects on other variables, often with the purpose of establishing cause-and-effect relationships.

Referencing the original exercise, 'Health Halos and Fast-Food Consumption' is classified as an experiment because the researchers actively manipulated the variable of coupon type. By doing so, they could analyze how this influenced the students' choices of additional items. This type of study design allows for a better inference on causality than observational studies.
Manipulation of Variables
The manipulation of variables is a critical concept when designing an experiment. It refers to the deliberate change or assignment of different conditions to subjects to observe the resulting variation in other variables. This intentional alteration is what differentiates an experiment from an observational study.

In the provided exercise, the variable manipulated by the researchers was the type of coupon received by the participants. This active intervention is crucial to determine the nature of the study—an experiment. The manipulation enables the researchers to analyze the causal effect of this intervention, which is how the perception of the brand (healthy vs. unhealthy) influenced the students' subsequent choices in ordering side items. By contrast, if the researchers had only recorded data on what students ordered without providing coupons, it would have been an observational study, limiting the ability to make causal inferences.
Research Design
Research design refers to the rigorous planning that goes into the structure of a study, ensuring that the resulting data can answer the specific research questions posed. It's essential for producing valid and reliable findings, and choosing between an observational study or an experiment is a fundamental part of this phase.

For experiments, a well-crafted research design will include a clear definition of independent and dependent variables, as well as a strategy for controlling confounding variables. Good designs also include random assignment to reduce selection bias and ensure the results are generalizable. The research design in our exercise included the deliberate distribution of different coupons and the controlled setting of a fast-food restaurant environment. Such meticulous planning ensures that conclusions drawn about the influence of perceived healthiness on food choices are supported by the data collected.
Data Analysis
Data analysis is the process by which raw data is transformed into useful insights. It involves cleaning, inspecting, transforming, and modeling data to discover useful information, suggest conclusions, and support decision-making.

In our exercise, data analysis would involve statistical methods to assess the differences between the two groups that received the McDonald's and Subway coupons, respectively. Researchers might use t-tests, chi-square tests, or linear regression models, depending on the nature of the data and the specific hypotheses. The ultimate goal here is to determine whether the manipulated variable (type of coupon) had a statistically significant effect on the choices of additional food items. Effective data analysis answers the proposed research questions and ideally sheds light on potential causality, especially in experiments where variables have been deliberately manipulated.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The authors of the paper "Illicit Use of Psychostimulants among College Students" (Psychology, Health \& Medicine [2002]: 283-287) surveyed college students about their use of legal and illegal stimulants. The sample of students surveyed consisted of students enrolled in a psychology class at a small, competitive college in the United States. a. Was this sample a simple random sample, a stratified sample, a systematic sample, or a convenience sample? Explain. b. Explain why an estimate of the proportion of students who reported using illegal stimulants based on data from this survey should not be generalized to all U.S. college students.

The authors of the paper "Fudging the Numbers: Distributing Chocolate Influences Student Evaluations of an Undergraduate Course" (Teaching in Psychology [2007]: \(245-247\) ) carried out a study to see if events unrelated to an undergraduate course could affect student evaluations. Students enrolled in statistics courses taught by the same instructor participated in the study. All students attended the same lectures and one of six discussion sections that met once a week. At the end of the course, the researchers chose three of the discussion sections to be the "chocolate group." Students in these three sections were offered chocolate prior to having them fill out course evaluations. Students in the other three sections were not offered chocolate. The researchers concluded that "Overall, students offered chocolate gave more positive evaluations than students not offered chocolate." Indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice.

The article "Why We Fall for This" (AARP Magazine, May/June 2011) described a study in which a business professor divided his class into two groups. He showed students a mug and then asked students in one of the groups how much they would pay for the mug. Students in the other group were asked how much they would sell the mug for if it belonged to them. Surprisingly, the average value assigned to the mug was quite different for the two groups! Indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice.

Is doing tai chi, a traditional Chinese martial art, good for the immune system? The authors of a paper that appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association (2007, pages 511-517) describe an experiment in which 112 healthy older adults were assigned at random to one of two groups. One group was the tai chi group. People in this group did tai chi for 40 minutes, three times a week, for 16 weeks. At the end of the 16 weeks, they received a vaccine designed to protect against a certain virus. Nine weeks later, a measurement of immunity to the virus was made. People in the second group served as a control group. They did not do tai chi during the first 16 weeks but received the virus vaccine at the same time as the tai chi group, and their immunity was also measured nine weeks later. a. Briefly describe why it was important for the researchers to assign participants to one of the two groups rather than letting the participants choose which group they wanted to be in. b. Explain why it was important to include a control group in this experiment.

Data from a poll conducted by Travelocity led to the following estimates: Approximately \(40 \%\) of travelers check their work e-mail while on vacation; about \(33 \%\) take their cell phones on vacation to stay connected with work; and about \(25 \%\) bring their laptops on vacation (San Luis Obispo Tribune, December 1,2005 ). Are the given percentages statistics or population characteristics?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.