/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 67 In many digital environments, us... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In many digital environments, users are allowed to choose how they are represented visually online. Does the way in which people are represented online affect online behavior? This question was examined by the authors of the paper "The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior" (Human Communication Research [2007]: 271-290). Participants were randomly assigned either an attractive avatar (a graphical image that represents a person) to represent them or an unattractive avatar. The researchers concluded that when interacting with a person of the opposite gender in an online virtual environment, those assigned an attractive avatar moved significantly closer to the other person than those who had been assigned an unattractive avatar. This difference was attributed to the attractiveness of the avatar. Explain why the researchers would not have been able to reach this conclusion if participants had been allowed to choose one of the two avatars (attractive, unattractive) themselves.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Should the participants have chosen their avatars, the researchers wouldn't be able to decisively attribute the proximity in online interaction to the avatar's attractiveness. The choice of avatar would have introduced a confounding variable, and it would be unclear whether the latter or personal preference affected behavior.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Concept

We need to understand the basics of experimental design first. One of the key elements of properly structured experiments is 'random assignment'. This is ensuring that each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to any of the groups in an experiment. In context of this problem, users were randomly assigned either an attractive avatar or an unattractive avatar.
02

Implications of Random Assignment

Random assignment is crucial because it removes participant bias and allows a researcher to make causal inferences about the influence of the independent variable (in this case, the attractiveness of avatar) on the dependent variable (in this case, proximity to the other person during online interaction).
03

Outcome if Participants Choose Avatars

If participants were allowed to choose their avatars, the researchers would not have been able to conclusively say whether the proximity to the opposite gender was due to the attractiveness of the avatar or due to the participant’s own decision to choose a certain type of avatar. The individual’s preference themselves would work as a confounding variable in the study.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Assignment
Random assignment plays a critical role in the validity of experiments within statistics. It involves allocating participants in a study to various experimental groups on a purely random basis. This method is fundamental in experimental design because it ensures that each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to any condition, thereby attempting to eliminate personal biases or pre-existing differences among participants.

For instance, in the study about avatar attractiveness influencing online behavior, random assignment was utilized to place users into groups with either an attractive or unattractive avatar. Without random assignment, the study could have been compromised by participants' preconceived notions or preferences, which could influence the outcome and render the results less reliable. It allows for a fair comparison between groups, as it minimizes the chances that any differences observed are due to underlying factors rather than the variable being tested—the attractiveness of the avatar in this case.
Independent Variable
The independent variable is the element of an experiment that is manipulated or changed to observe its effects on the dependent variable. It is the presumed cause in a cause-effect relationship under study.

In the avatar experiment, the independent variable is the attractiveness of the avatar. Researchers manipulated this variable by assigning participants with avatars that were predefined as either attractive or unattractive. The idea was to observe any subsequent changes in behavior, specifically how physically close participants would position themselves to a person of the opposite gender in an online environment.
Dependent Variable
In contrast to the independent variable, the dependent variable is what researchers measure or expect to change as a result of manipulation of the independent variable. It is the effect or outcome that is being studied.

In the study at hand, the dependent variable is the distance that participants place their avatar from another when interacting with the opposite gender. The expectation is that the attractiveness of the avatar (independent variable) will cause changes in this proximity (dependent variable). By measuring this outcome, researchers aim to uncover whether the manipulation of avatar attractiveness has a significant effect on user behavior.
Causal Inferences
Causal inferences are conclusions about the presence of a cause-and-effect relationship between variables. In experimental design, researchers make causal inferences when they determine that the manipulation of one variable (the independent variable) produces a change in another (the dependent variable). However, to validly make such inferences, the study must be well-designed and control for confounding variables.

The Proteus effect study presumes that the attractiveness of the avatar (cause) affects the user's behavior (effect) in terms of how close they get to another online user. If participants had chosen their avatars, it would be difficult to make a causal inference since personal preferences could be the actual cause of the behavior, not the avatar's attractiveness.
Confounding Variable
A confounding variable is an outside influence that can affect the outcome of an experiment by mixing its effect with the effect of the independent variable. This makes it difficult to isolate the true cause of any observed changes in the dependent variable.

Had participants in the avatar study been allowed to choose their representations, their personal preference would have become a confounding variable. Personal preference might correlate both with the choice of avatar and with proxemic behavior, making it challenging to determine whether the behavior was due to the attractiveness of the avatar or the participant's self-expression. The controlled experiment with random assignment allowed the researchers to minimize the influence of such confounding variables and make more accurate causal inferences.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Whether or not to continue a Mardi Gras Parade through downtown San Luis Obispo, California, is a hotly debated topic. The parade is popular with students and many residents, but some celebrations have led to complaints and a call to eliminate the parade. The local newspaper conducted online and telephone surveys of its readers and was surprised by the results. The online survey received more than 400 responses, with more than \(60 \%\) favoring continuing the parade, while the telephone response line received more than 120 calls, with more than \(90 \%\) favoring banning the parade (San Luis Obispo Tribune, March 3,2004 ). What factors may have contributed to these very different results?

Data from a poll conducted by Travelocity led to the following estimates: Approximately \(40 \%\) of travelers check their work e-mail while on vacation; about \(33 \%\) take their cell phones on vacation to stay connected with work; and about \(25 \%\) bring their laptops on vacation (San Luis Obispo Tribune, December 1,2005 ). Are the given percentages statistics or population characteristics?

A survey of affluent Americans (those with incomes of $$ 75,000\( or more) indicated that \)57 \%$ would rather have more time than more money (USA Today, January 29, 2003). a. What condition on how the data were collected would make it reasonable to generalize this result to the population of affluent Americans? b. Would it be reasonable to generalize this result to the population of all Americans? Explain why or why not.

The article "Why We Fall for This" (AARP Magazine, May/June 2011) described a study in which a business professor divided his class into two groups. He showed students a mug and then asked students in one of the groups how much they would pay for the mug. Students in the other group were asked how much they would sell the mug for if it belonged to them. Surprisingly, the average value assigned to the mug was quite different for the two groups! Indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice.

Based on a study of 2,121 children between the ages of 1 and 4 , researchers at the Medical College of Wisconsin concluded that there was an association between iron deficiency and the length of time that a child is bottle-fed (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, November 26,2005\() .\) Describe the sample and the population of interest for this study.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.