/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 47 Based on a survey conducted on t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Based on a survey conducted on the DietSmart.com website, investigators concluded that women who regularly watched Oprah were only one-seventh as likely to crave fattening foods as those who watched other daytime talk shows (San Luis Obispo Tribune, October 14,2000 ). a. Is it reasonable to conclude that watching Oprah causes a decrease in cravings for fattening foods? Explain. b. Is it reasonable to generalize the results of this survey to all women in the United States? To all women who watch daytime talk shows? Explain why or why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. No, it's not reasonable to conclude that watching Oprah causes a decrease in cravings for fattening foods based on the given data. b. Also, without details on the sample used in this study, it's not reasonable to generalize this finding to all women in the U.S. or to all women who watch daytime talk shows.

Step by step solution

01

Determining the Causal Relationship

To determine if there is a causal relationship between watching Oprah and decreased craving for fattening foods, simply establish if there was an experiment conducted where one group watched Oprah while a control group did not. However, the exercise does not provide this information, hence causality cannot be established based only on this observation.
02

Analyze the Generalizability of Results

To determine if the results can be generalized to all women in the United States or to all women who watch daytime talk shows, it’s necessary to know how representative the sample in the study was. If a wide variety of women from different backgrounds, ages, regions, etc., were included in the study, it would be more convincing to generalize the findings. Again, without these details, it is imprudent to generalize the results of this survey.
03

Final Assessment

Summarize the findings from steps 1 and 2: Firstly, it's not reasonable to conclude that watching Oprah causes a decrease in cravings for fattening foods as the given information doesn't allow the establishment of causality. Secondly, without knowledge on the representativeness of the sample, the results cannot be generalized to all women in the United States or to all women who watch daytime talk shows.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Causal Relationship
In the world of statistical inference, understanding causal relationships is crucial. A causal relationship implies that one event (in this case, watching a TV show) directly influences another event (such as craving for fattening foods). To scientifically establish a causal relationship, an experiment must be designed where participants are randomly assigned to different groups, such as a treatment group and a control group. This ensures that all other variables are controlled for, and any observed changes in the outcome can be attributed to the treatment itself.

In our example, the claim is that watching Oprah decreases cravings for fattening foods. However, since the exercise does not discuss an experiment, only a survey, we cannot determine causality. A survey provides observational data. It may show that people who watch Oprah tend to crave less, but it doesn't prove Oprah is the cause. Other factors not controlled in the survey could be responsible for this observation. Therefore, without rigorous experimental design, claiming a causal relationship remains speculative.
Generalization
Generalization involves applying the findings from a study to a broader population. In statistical studies, it's crucial to consider whether the sample used is representative of the entire population we wish to make conclusions about.

For instance, with the Oprah-viewing survey, if the sample only included women frequenting the DietSmart.com website, it's unclear whether they represent all women in the United States or all women watching daytime talk shows. Generalization is valid only when the sample is randomly selected from the population and sufficiently large and diverse. This would ensure variations in demographics like age, socioeconomic status, and geographic location are captured.

Without this assurance of representativeness in the sample, generalizing the results to broader populations becomes problematic. In this case, we would not confidently extend the findings beyond the specific group surveyed.
Survey Analysis
Survey analysis is a fundamental method in social sciences to gather data and insights on various topics. When conducted correctly, surveys provide a snapshot of attitudes, behaviors, or characteristics from a group of people. The effectiveness of survey analysis relies substantially on its design and execution.

Key elements include the sample selection, survey questions, and methodology of data collection. It's crucial that surveys aim to minimize bias by ensuring questions are neutral and that the sample is representative of the target population.
  • Sample Selection: This should aim for randomness and diversity to ensure every subgroup of the population is proportionately represented.
  • Survey Questions: Must be carefully worded to avoid leading respondents toward particular answers.
  • Data Collection: Methods should ensure accuracy and honesty from participants.

In the example of the Oprah survey, it is important to closely examine how these elements were handled. Without clear information about them, the conclusions drawn from the survey remain questionable in terms of reliability and validity.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Based on a study of 2,121 children between the ages of 1 and 4 , researchers at the Medical College of Wisconsin concluded that there was an association between iron deficiency and the length of time that a child is bottle-fed (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, November 26,2005\() .\) Describe the sample and the population of interest for this study.

Whether or not to continue a Mardi Gras Parade through downtown San Luis Obispo, California, is a hotly debated topic. The parade is popular with students and many residents, but some celebrations have led to complaints and a call to eliminate the parade. The local newspaper conducted online and telephone surveys of its readers and was surprised by the results. The online survey received more than 400 responses, with more than \(60 \%\) favoring continuing the parade, while the telephone response line received more than 120 calls, with more than \(90 \%\) favoring banning the parade (San Luis Obispo Tribune, March 3,2004 ). What factors may have contributed to these very different results?

The following is from an article titled "After the Workout, Got Chocolate Milk?" that appeared in the Chicago Tribune (January 18,2005\():\) Researchers at Indiana University at Bloomington have found that chocolate milk effectively helps athletes recover from an intense workout. They had nine cyclists bike, rest four hours, then bike again, three separate times. After each workout, the cyclists downed chocolate milk or energy drinks Gatorade or Endurox (two to three glasses per hour); then, in the second workout of each set, they cycled to exhaustion. When they drank chocolate milk, the amount of time they could cycle until they were exhausted was similar to when they drank Gatorade and longer than when they drank Endurox. For the experiment to have been well designed, it must have incorporated random assignment. Briefly explain where the researcher would have needed to use random assignment for the conclusion of the experiment to be valid.

A consumer group conducts crash tests of new model cars. To determine the severity of damage to 2013 Toyota Camrys resulting from a 10 -mph crash into a concrete wall, the research group tests six cars of this type and assesses the amount of damage. Describe the population and sample for this problem.

A study of college students showed a temporary gain of up to nine IQ points after listening to a Mozart piano sonata. This result, dubbed the Mozart effect, has since been criticized by a number of researchers who have been unable to confirm the result in similar studies. Suppose that you want to determine if there is really is a Mozart effect. You decide to carry out an experiment with three experimental groups. One group will listen to a Mozart piano sonata that lasts 24 minutes. The second group will listen to popular music for the same length of time, and the third group will relax for 24 minutes with no music playing. You will measure IQ before and after the 24 minute period. Suppose that you have 45 volunteers who have agreed to participate in the experiment. Describe a method of randomly assigning each of the volunteers to one of the experimental groups.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.