91Ó°ÊÓ

The confidence level is a crucial concept in statistics that reflects how confident we are in the accuracy of our sample estimate reflecting the true population parameter. For instance, a confidence level of 95% signifies that if we were to draw 100 different samples and compute sample proportions, approximately 95 of them would fall within the specified margin of error around the true population proportion.

In our original exercise, the commentator wants his estimate to be 95% confident. This level of confidence is associated with a z-score of approximately 1.96, which is used in the formula for determining sample size. Higher confidence levels would demand larger sample sizes, and vice versa. The confidence level ensures that our estimate is reliably close to the true value most of the time.

The margin of error (E) describes the range within which the true population proportion is expected to lie. It is a measure of the estimate’s precision. For example, in our exercise, the commentator aims for a margin of error of 3 percentage points (which we convert to a decimal as 0.03).

This means that if the true proportion of Americans who follow professional football is 53%, his estimate will likely fall somewhere between 50% and 56%. The margin of error depends on the sample size and the variability in the data. A smaller margin of error requires a larger sample size to ensure higher precision in the estimate, but it provides more confidence that our estimate is close to the true population value.

Proportion estimation is used to determine the percentage of a population that exhibits a particular trait, such as following professional football. It is often based on a sample of the population and an estimate proportion \[ \bar{p} \] derived from observed data.

In the problem, the commentator uses a prior estimate from a 2010 Harris poll, where 53% of Americans were found to follow professional football. This estimated proportion is denoted as \[ \bar{p} = 0.53 \]. When prior data is available, it can enhance the accuracy of the sample size estimation.

Without prior data, a proportion of 0.5 is used as it maximizes the necessary sample size, ensuring that our sample is large enough to capture the diversity of the population and produce a reliable proportion estimate.

Usage of a prior estimate can significantly influence the sample size needed for a survey. When a reliable prior estimate (\bar{p}) is available, it helps in refining the sample size. For instance, in our exercise, the prior estimate of 53% from a 2010 poll is used. This affects the required number of samples since the estimate is close to 0.5.

The formula for the sample size with a prior estimate is \[ n = \frac{{ z^2 \bar{p} (1 - \bar{p}) }}{{ E^2 }} \]. This calculation adjusts according to the variability in the prior estimate. In the absence of prior data, assuming \[ \bar{p} = 0.5 \] ensures that sample size covers the maximum variability, resulting in a computation similar to part (a) of the exercise.

The results of parts (a) and (b) are close because both prior estimate (0.53) and 0.5 yield similar sample sizes, displaying that slight deviations around 0.5 do not majorly affect the sample size.