/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 30 John has an online company that ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

John has an online company that sells custom rims for cars and designed two different web pages that he wants to use to sell his rims online. However, he cannot decide which page to go with, so he decides to collect data to see which site results in a higher proportion of sales. He hires a firm that has the ability to randomly assign one of his two web page designs to potential customers. With web page design I, John secures a sale from 54 out of 523 hits to the page. With web page design II, John secures a sale from 62 out of 512 hits to the page. (a) What is the response variable in this study? What is the explanatory variable? (b) Based on these results, which web page, if any, should John go with? Why? Note: This problem is based on the type of research done by Adobe Test \& Target.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Response: number of sales; Explanatory: web page design. (b) John should choose design II as it has a higher proportion of sales.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Variables

The response variable is the outcome affected by the variables being studied. In this case, the response variable is the number of sales made. The explanatory variable is the condition that is manipulated to observe its effect on the response variable. Here, the explanatory variable is the web page design (design I or design II).
02

Calculate the Proportion of Sales for Each Web Page

For web page design I, the proportion of sales is calculated as follows: \ \[ p_1 = \frac{54}{523} \approx 0.1032 \] \ For web page design II, the proportion of sales is: \ \[ p_2 = \frac{62}{512} \approx 0.1211 \]
03

Compare the Proportions

Compare the proportions calculated in the previous step to determine which web page design resulted in a higher proportion of sales. \ \( p_1 \approx 0.1032 \) for design I and \( p_2 \approx 0.1211 \) for design II.
04

Conclusion

Design II has a higher proportion of sales (\( p_2 \approx 0.1211 \)) compared to design I (\( p_1 \approx 0.1032 \)). Therefore, John should go with web page design II as it results in a higher proportion of sales.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Response Variable
In any experiment or study, the response variable is the main factor being measured or observed. It is the outcome that researchers are interested in. In John's case, the response variable is the number of sales made on each web page. This variable shows how successful each web page design is in converting visitors into customers. By measuring the number of sales, John can determine which web page is more effective in driving sales for his custom rims.
Explanatory Variable
The explanatory variable is the one that is manipulated to observe its effect on the response variable. It helps explain changes in the response variable. In John's study, the explanatory variable is the web page design. John has two different designs (Design I and Design II) and wants to see which one performs better. By comparing the sales from both web page designs, John can understand the effect of the web page design on his sales.
Proportion Comparison
Making comparisons using proportions is a common method in statistical analysis. Proportions help us understand parts of a whole in a simplified form.
John calculates the proportion of sales for each web page design as follows:
  • For Design I: The proportion of sales is \( p_1 = \frac{54}{523} \approx 0.1032 \)
  • For Design II: The proportion of sales is \( p_2 = \frac{62}{512} \approx 0.1211 \)
Comparing these proportions allows John to see that Design II has a higher proportion of sales (\( p_2 \approx 0.1211 \)), indicating that it performs better in converting visitors into customers.
Web Page Design
Web page design plays a crucial role in user experience and conversion rates. A well-designed web page can attract visitors, encourage them to browse, and ultimately lead to a purchase. In John's experiment:
  • Design I and Design II offer different layouts, styles, and user interfaces.
  • These variations can influence how users interact with the site and make a purchase decision.
John's data collection aims to understand which design is more effective in driving sales. By analyzing sales data, he can make an informed decision on which design to use.
Sales Analysis
Analyzing sales performance is critical for any business looking to optimize its operations and improve profitability. In this study, sales analysis involves comparing the number of sales generated by each web page design.
John can perform this analysis through the following steps:
  • Collecting sales data from both web page designs.
  • Calculating the sales proportions for each design.
  • Comparing these proportions to determine which design performs better.
Based on the results, Design II shows a higher proportion of sales, suggesting it is more effective. This targeted analysis helps John make better decisions for his business.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In June \(2014,\) the Gallup organization surveyed 1134 American adults and found that 298 had confidence in public schools. In June \(2013,\) the Gallup organization had surveyed 1134 American adults and found that 360 had confidence in public schools. Suppose that a newspaper article has a headline that reads, "Confidence in Public Schools Deteriorates." Is this an accurate headline? Why?

In an experiment conducted online at the University of Mississippi, study participants are asked to react to a stimulus. In one experiment, the participant must press a key on seeing a blue screen and reaction time (in seconds) to press the key is measured. The same person is then asked to press a key on seeing a red screen, again with reaction time measured. The results for six randomly sampled study participants are as follows: $$ \begin{array}{lcccccc} \text { Participant } & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{4} & \mathbf{5} & \mathbf{6} \\ \hline \text { Blue } & 0.582 & 0.481 & 0.841 & 0.267 & 0.685 & 0.450 \\ \hline \text { Red } & 0.408 & 0.407 & 0.542 & 0.402 & 0.456 & 0.533 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Why are these matched-pairs data? (b) In this study, the color that the participant was first asked to react to was randomly selected. Why is this a good idea in this experiment? (c) Is the reaction time to the blue stimulus different from the reaction time to the red stimulus at the \(\alpha=0.01\) level of significance? Note: A normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no outliers. (d) Construct a \(99 \%\) confidence interval about the population mean difference. Interpret your results. (e) Draw a boxplot of the differenced data. Does this visual evidence support the results obtained in part (c)?

Construct a confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) at the given level of confidence. \(x_{1}=804, n_{1}=874, x_{2}=892, n_{2}=954,95 \%\) confidence

Putting It Together: Online Homework Professor Stephen Zuro of Joliet Junior College wanted to determine whether an online homework system (meaning students did homework online and received instant feedback with helpful guidance about their answers) improved scores on a final exam. In the fall semester, he taught a precalculus class using an online homework system. In the spring semester, he taught a precalculus class without the homework system (which meant students were responsible for doing their homework the old- fashioned way - paper and pencil). Professor Zuro made sure to teach the two courses identically (same text, syllabus, tests, meeting time, meeting location, and so on ). The table summarizes the results of the two classes on their final exam $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Fall Semester } & \text { Spring Semester } \\ \hline \text { Number of students } & 27 & 25 \\ \hline \text { Mean final exam score } & 73.6 & 67.9 \\ \hline \text { Standard deviation } & 10.3 & 12.4 \\ \text { final exam score } & & \end{array} $$ (a) What type of experimental design is this? (b) What is the response variable? What are the treatments in the study? (c) What factors are controlled in the experiment? (d) In many experiments, the researcher will recruit volunteers and randomly assign the individuals to a treatment group. In what regard was this done for this experiment? (e) Did the students perform better on the final exam in the fall semester? Use an \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (f) Can you think of any factors that may confound the results? Could Professor Zuro have done anything about these confounding factors?

TIMS is an acronym for the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Kumon promotes a method of studying mathematics that it claims develops mathematical ability. Do data support this claim? In one particular question on the TIMS exam, a random sample of 400 non-Kumon students resulted in 73 getting the correct answer. For the same question, a random sample of 400 Kumon students resulted in 130 getting the correct answer. Perform the appropriate test to substantiate Kumon's claims. Are there any confounding factors regarding the claim?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.