/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 The Pew Research Group conducted... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The Pew Research Group conducted a poll in which they asked, 鈥淎re you in favor of, or opposed to, executing persons as a general policy when the crime was committed while under the age of 18?鈥 Of the 580 Catholics surveyed, 180 indicated they favored capital punishment; of the 600 seculars (those who do not associate with a religion) surveyed, 238 favored capital punishment. Is there a significant difference in the proportion of individuals in these groups in favor of capital punishment for persons under the age of 18? Use the a = 0.01 level of significance.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject the null hypothesis; there is a significant difference in the proportions.

Step by step solution

01

Set up the null and alternative hypotheses

The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) states that there is no difference in the proportions of individuals in favor of capital punishment between Catholics and seculars. The alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) states that there is a significant difference.\[ H_0: p_1 = p_2 \]\[ H_a: p_1 eq p_2 \]
02

Calculate sample proportions

Calculate the sample proportions for both Catholics \( p_1 \) and seculars \( p_2 \).\[ p_1 = \frac{180}{580} \approx 0.3103 \]\[ p_2 = \frac{238}{600} \approx 0.3967 \]
03

Find the pooled proportion

The pooled proportion \( p \) is calculated using the total number of individuals and those in favor from both groups.\[ p = \frac{180 + 238}{580 + 600} = \frac{418}{1180} \approx 0.3542 \]
04

Calculate the standard error

The standard error (SE) of the difference in proportions is calculated using the pooled proportion.\[ SE = \sqrt{p(1-p)\left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)} \]\[ SE = \sqrt{0.3542(1-0.3542)\left(\frac{1}{580} + \frac{1}{600}\right)} \approx 0.0291 \]
05

Calculate the test statistic

The test statistic is calculated using the sample proportions and the standard error.\[ Z = \frac{(p_1 - p_2)}{SE} = \frac{0.3103 - 0.3967}{0.0291} \approx -2.97 \]
06

Determine the critical value

For \( \alpha = 0.01 \) in a two-tailed test, the critical value is \( Z_{\alpha/2} = \pm 2.576 \).
07

Make the decision

Compare the test statistic to the critical value. If the Z value is beyond \( \pm 2.576 \), reject the null hypothesis. In this case, \( -2.97 \) is less than \( -2.576 \), so reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is a significant difference in the proportions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

null hypothesis
When we start any hypothesis test, we begin with a null hypothesis, often abbreviated as \(H_0\). This represents a statement of no effect or no difference. In our problem, the null hypothesis suggests that there is no difference in the proportions of Catholics and seculars who favor capital punishment for persons under the age of 18.

In more formal terms, we write this as \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \), where \(p_1\) is the proportion of Catholics who favor capital punishment, and \(p_2\) is the proportion for seculars. This hypothesis is essentially saying that both groups have the same opinion regarding this issue.

We use the null hypothesis to set up our test; if the evidence strongly contradicts it, we will reject it in favor of an alternative hypothesis.
alternative hypothesis
After setting up the null hypothesis, we establish the alternative hypothesis, noted as \(H_a\). This describes what we would believe if the null hypothesis were proven false. In our case, it suggests that there is a significant difference between the two proportions.

Formally, we write it as \( H_a: p_1 eq p_2 \). This indicates that the proportions of Catholics and seculars who favor capital punishment are significantly different.

The decision to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative one depends on the results of the test statistic we calculate during the hypothesis testing process.
proportion comparison
In our exercise, we are comparing the proportions of two distinct groups: Catholics and seculars. Proportions are a way of expressing parts of a whole and are calculated by dividing the number of individuals with a particular characteristic by the total number of individuals in the group.

Let's compute the proportions for each group:
  • For Catholics: \( p_1 = \frac{180}{580} \approx 0.3103 \)
  • For seculars: \( p_2 = \frac{238}{600} \approx 0.3967 \)
These sample proportions form the basis of our hypothesis test.

The next step involves combining these proportions to compute a pooled proportion, which we use to find the standard error of our comparison.
standard error
The standard error (SE) is a measure of the variability or spread of the sampling distribution of a statistic, in this case, the difference between two proportions. It helps us understand how much the sample proportions might vary from the true population proportions.

Using the pooled proportion \( p = 0.3542 \), we compute the standard error as follows:

\[ SE = \sqrt{p (1-p) \left( \frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)} \]

With our pooled proportion \( p \approx 0.3542 \), and sample sizes for Catholics \( n_1 = 580 \) and seculars \( n_2 = 600 \), we find:

\[ SE \approx 0.0291 \]

This standard error quantifies the uncertainty in our estimate of the difference in proportions.
test statistic
A test statistic is a standardized value that reflects the difference between the sample proportions we observe and what the null hypothesis expects. We use the standard error to compute this value. For our exercise, the test statistic \(Z\) is calculated as follows:

\[ Z = \frac{(p_1 - p_2)}{SE} \]

Substituting our values:

\[ Z = \frac{0.3103 - 0.3967}{0.0291} \approx -2.97 \]

This \(Z\) value tells us how many standard errors our observed difference is away from the hypothesized difference of zero.

We then compare this value to the critical values from the \(Z\) distribution corresponding to our chosen significance level \(\alpha\). If our test statistic falls beyond these critical values, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the proportions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In June \(2014,\) the Gallup organization surveyed 1134 American adults and found that 298 had confidence in public schools. In June \(2013,\) the Gallup organization had surveyed 1134 American adults and found that 360 had confidence in public schools. Suppose that a newspaper article has a headline that reads, "Confidence in Public Schools Deteriorates." Is this an accurate headline? Why?

It is a commonly held belief that SUVs are safer than cars. If an SUV and car are in a collision, does the SUV sustain less damage (as suggested by the cost of repair)? The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crashed SUVs into cars, with the SUV moving 10 miles per hour and the front of the SUV crashing into the rear of the car. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { SUV into Car } & \text { SUV Damage } & \text { Car Damage } \\ \hline \text { Honda CR-V into Honda Civic } & 1721 & 1274 \\ \hline \text { Toyota RAV4 into Toyota Corolla } & 1434 & 2327 \\ \hline \text { Hyundai Tucson into Kia Forte } & 850 & 3223 \\ \hline \text { Volkswagen Tiguan into VW Golf } & 2329 & 2058 \\ \hline \text { Jeep Patriot into Dodge Caliber } & 1415 & 3095 \\ \hline \text { Ford Escape into Ford Focus } & 1470 & 3386 \\ \hline \text { Nissan Rogue into Nissan Sentra } & 2884 & 4560 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Why are these matched-pairs data? (b) Draw a boxplot of the differenced data. Does the visual evidence support the belief that SUVs have a lower repair cost? (c) Do the data suggest the repair cost for the car is higher? Use an \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. Note: A normal probability plot indicates the differenced data are approximately normal with no outliers.

Conduct each test at the a = 0.05 level of significance by determining (a) the null and alternative hypotheses, (b) the test statistic, (c) the critical value, and (d) the P-value. Assume that the samples were obtained independently using simple random sampling. Test whether \(p_{1} \neq p_{2}\). Sample data: \(x_{1}=804, n_{1}=874\) \(x_{2}=902, n_{2}=954\)

Perform the appropriate hypothesis test. If \(n_{1}=61, s_{1}=18.3, n_{2}=57,\) and \(s_{2}=13.5,\) test whether the population standard deviations differ at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance.

Determine whether the sampling is dependent or independent. Indicate whether the response variable is qualitative or quantitative. A psychologist wants to know whether subjects respond faster to a go/no go stimulus or a choice stimulus. With the go/no go stimulus, subjects must respond to a particular stimulus by pressing a button and disregard other stimuli. In the choice stimulus, the subjects respond differently depending on the stimulus. The psychologist randomly selects 20 subjects, and each subject is presented a series of go/no go stimuli and choice stimuli. The mean reaction time to each stimulus is compared.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.