/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 A researcher wants to know if st... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A researcher wants to know if students who do not plan to apply for financial aid had more variability on the SAT I math test than those who plan to do so. She obtains a random sample of 35 students who do not plan to apply for financial aid and a random sample of 38 students who do plan to apply for financial aid and obtains the following results: $$ \begin{array}{cc} \begin{array}{l} \text { Do Not Plan to Apply } \\ \text { for Financial Aid } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Plan to Apply } \\ \text { for Financial Aid } \end{array} \\ \hline n_{1}=35 & n_{2}=38 \\ \hline s_{1}=123.1 & s_{2}=119.4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Do students who do not plan to apply for financial aid have a higher standard deviation on the SAT I math exam than students who plan to apply for financial aid at the \(\alpha=0.01\) level of significance? SAT I math exam scores are known to be normally distributed.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Fail to reject the null hypothesis. No significant evidence that variances differ.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

First, state the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H鈧) assumes that the variances are equal, and the alternative hypothesis (H鈧) assumes that the variance of the scores for those who do not plan to apply for financial aid is greater than for those who do plan to apply.\[ H鈧: \ \ \sigma^2_1 = \sigma^2_2 \ \ H鈧: \ \ \sigma^2_1 > \sigma^2_2 \]
02

Identify the Test Statistic

Use the F-test for comparing two variances. The test statistic is defined as: \[ F = \frac{ s^2_1 }{ s^2_2 } \]Where \( s^2_1 \) and \( s^2_2 \) are the sample variances for the two groups.
03

Calculate the Test Statistic

Perform the calculation using the sample standard deviations provided: \[ s_1 = 123.1 \quad \ n_1 = 35 \ s_2 = 119.4 \quad \ n_2 = 38 \] \[ F = \frac{ (123.1)^2 }{ (119.4)^2 } = \frac{ 15148.41 }{ 14256.36 } \approx 1.063 \]
04

Determine the Critical Value

Look up the critical value for an F-distribution with \(df_1 = n_1 - 1 = 34\) and \(df_2 = n_2 - 1 = 37\) at the \( \alpha = 0.01 \) level of significance (one-tailed test).
05

Compare the Test Statistic to the Critical Value

Compare the calculated F-value with the critical F-value from statistical tables or software. If the calculated F-value is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis.
06

Conclusion

Because the calculated F-value (1.063) is less than the critical F-value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is no significant evidence to conclude that students who do not plan to apply for financial aid have a higher standard deviation in SAT I math scores than those who plan to apply for financial aid at the 0.01 significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F-test
The F-test is a statistical test that is used to compare the variances of two populations. Variance measures the spread or variability within a set of data points. In simpler terms, it helps determine if two sets of data have different levels of dispersion. To perform an F-test, you start by calculating the ratio of the two sample variances. This ratio forms the F-test statistic. The formula for the F-test statistic is:

\[ F = \frac{s^2_1}{s^2_2} \]

Here, \( s^2_1 \) and \( s^2_2 \) are the sample variances. The calculated F-value is then compared to a critical value from the F-distribution table. If the F-value is larger than the critical value, we conclude that there is a significant difference between the variances of the two samples. The F-test is powerful because it helps to validate the variability differences between two groups and is commonly used in hypothesis testing scenarios.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method for making decisions using data. It involves an initial assumption, called the null hypothesis (H鈧), and an alternative hypothesis (H鈧) which is what you want to prove. In our example, we're testing whether the variance for students who don't plan to apply for financial aid is greater than for those who do.

The null hypothesis assumes no difference between the variances, while the alternative suggests otherwise:

\[ H鈧 : \sigma^2_1 = \sigma^2_2 \]
\[ H鈧 : \sigma^2_1 > \sigma^2_2 \]
Once you have set up your hypotheses, you use statistical tests (like the F-test) to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. If the test shows significant evidence against H鈧, you reject it in favor of H鈧. Otherwise, you fail to reject H鈧, indicating insufficient evidence to support H鈧.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted as \( \alpha \), is the probability threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis. It defines how confident you need to be in your results before considering them statistically significant. A common choice for \( \alpha \) is 0.05, but in our example, it is 0.01. A lower \( \alpha \) makes the test more stringent.

If the probability of obtaining the observed results under the null hypothesis is less than \( \alpha \), you reject the null hypothesis. This implies that the observed data is highly unlikely under H鈧. Conversely, if the p-value (probability of obtaining the observed data) is greater than \( \alpha \), you fail to reject the null hypothesis. In simpler terms, \( \alpha \) helps control the likelihood of making a Type I error, which is incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is a key measure of variability in a dataset. It tells you how much individual data points deviate from the mean (average). A higher standard deviation indicates that data points are spread out more, whereas a lower standard deviation means they are closer to the mean.

The formula for standard deviation is:

\[ s = \sqrt{ \frac{1}{N-1} \sum_{i=1}^N (x_i - \bar{x})^2 } \]

Here, \((x_i - \bar{x})\) represents the deviation of each data point from the mean, \( \bar{x}\). When comparing two groups, differences in their standard deviations can provide insights into their variability. For instance, if one group has a higher standard deviation than another, it suggests more dispersion in its data points.
Sample Variance
Sample variance measures the spread of data points in a sample and is the square of the standard deviation. It provides insights into how much the data varies around the mean. The formula for sample variance is:

\[ s^2 = \frac{1}{N-1} \sum_{i=1}^N (x_i - \bar{x})^2 \]

Here, \((x_i - \bar{x})\) represents the deviation of each data point from the mean, \( \bar{x}\). Sample variance is crucial when comparing two sets of data because it directly influences the F-test statistic. In the context of hypothesis testing, it helps determine whether differences in variability between two groups are significant or just due to random chance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

College Skills The Collegiate Learning Assessment Plus (CLA+) is an exam that is meant to assess the intellectual gains made between one's freshman and senior year of college. The exam, graded on a scale of 400 to 1600 , assesses critical thinking, analytical reasoning, document literacy, writing, and communication. The exam was administered to 135 freshman in Fall 2012 at California State University Long Beach (CSULB). The mean score on the exam was 1191 with a standard deviation of 187 . The exam was also administered to graduating seniors of CSULB in Spring 2013. The mean score was 1252 with a standard deviation of \(182 .\) Explain the type of analysis that could be applied to these data to assess whether CLA+ scores increase while at CSULB. Explain the shortcomings in the data available and provide a better data collection technique.

Determine whether the sampling is dependent or independent. Indicate whether the response variable is qualitative or quantitative. A political scientist wants to know how a random sample of 18- to 25-year-olds feel about Democrats and Republicans in Congress. She obtains a random sample of 1030 registered voters 18 to 25 years of age and asks, 鈥淒o you have favorable/unfavorable [rotated] opinion of the Democratic/Republican [rotated] party?鈥 Each individual was asked to disclose his or her opinion about each party.

Putting It Together: Online Homework Professor Stephen Zuro of Joliet Junior College wanted to determine whether an online homework system (meaning students did homework online and received instant feedback with helpful guidance about their answers) improved scores on a final exam. In the fall semester, he taught a precalculus class using an online homework system. In the spring semester, he taught a precalculus class without the homework system (which meant students were responsible for doing their homework the old- fashioned way - paper and pencil). Professor Zuro made sure to teach the two courses identically (same text, syllabus, tests, meeting time, meeting location, and so on ). The table summarizes the results of the two classes on their final exam $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Fall Semester } & \text { Spring Semester } \\ \hline \text { Number of students } & 27 & 25 \\ \hline \text { Mean final exam score } & 73.6 & 67.9 \\ \hline \text { Standard deviation } & 10.3 & 12.4 \\ \text { final exam score } & & \end{array} $$ (a) What type of experimental design is this? (b) What is the response variable? What are the treatments in the study? (c) What factors are controlled in the experiment? (d) In many experiments, the researcher will recruit volunteers and randomly assign the individuals to a treatment group. In what regard was this done for this experiment? (e) Did the students perform better on the final exam in the fall semester? Use an \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (f) Can you think of any factors that may confound the results? Could Professor Zuro have done anything about these confounding factors?

A Secchi disk is an 8 -inch-diameter weighted disk that is painted black and white and attached to a rope. The disk is lowered into water and the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible is recorded. The measurement is an indication of water clarity. An environmental biologist interested in determining whether the water clarity of the lake at Joliet Junior College is improving takes measurements at the same location on eight dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates five years later. She obtains the following results: $$ \begin{array}{lcccccccc} \text { Observation } & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{4} & \mathbf{5} & \mathbf{6} & \mathbf{7} & \mathbf{8} \\ \text { Date } & \mathbf{5 / 1 1} & \mathbf{6 / 7} & \mathbf{6 / 2 4} & \mathbf{7 / 8} & \mathbf{7 / 2 7} & \mathbf{8 / 3 1} & 9 / 30 & \mathbf{1 0 / 1 2} \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Initial } \\ \text { depth, } X_{i} \end{array} & 38 & 58 & 65 & 74 & 56 & 36 & 56 & 52 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Depth five } \\ \text { years later, } Y_{i} \end{array} & 52 & 60 & 72 & 72 & 54 & 48 & 58 & 60 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Why is it important to take the measurements on the same date? (b) Does the evidence suggest that the clarity of the lake is improving at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance? Note: A normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no outliers. (c) Draw a boxplot of the differenced data. Does this visual evidence support the results obtained in part (b)?

The drug Prevnar is a vaccine meant to prevent certain types of bacterial meningitis, typically administered to infants around 2 months. In randomized, double-blind clinical trials of Prevnar, infants were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received Prevnar, while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the first dose, 107 of 710 subjects in the experimental group (group 1) experienced fever as a side effect. After the first dose, 67 of 611 of the subjects in the control group (group 2) experienced fever as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that a higher proportion of subjects in group 1 experienced fever as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at the a = 0.05 level of significance?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.