/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 38 Based on historical birthing rec... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Based on historical birthing records, the proportion of males born worldwide is \(0.51 .\) In other words, the commonly held belief that boys are just as likely as girls is false. Systematic lupus erythematosus (SLE), or lupus for short, is a disease in which one's immune system attacks healthy cells and tissue by mistake. It is well known that lupus tends to exist more in females than in males Researchers wondered, however, if families with a child who had lupus had a lower ratio of males to females than the general population. If this were true, it would suggest that something happens during conception that causes males to be conceived at a lower rate when the SLE gene is present. To determine if this hypothesis is true, the researchers obtained records of families with a child who had SLE A total of 23 males and 79 females were found to have SLE. The 23 males with SL \(E\) had \(a\) total of 23 male siblings and 22 female siblings The 79 females with SLE had a total of 69 male siblings and 80 female siblings Source L.N. Moorthy, M.G.E. Peterson, K.B. Onel, and T.J.A. Lehman. "Do Children with Lupus Have Fewer Male Siblings" Laprus 2008 \(17: 128-131,2008\) (a) Explain why this is an observational study. (b) Is the study retrospective or prospective? Why? (c) There are a total of \(23+69=92\) male siblings in the study How many female siblings are in the study? (d) Draw a relative frequency bar graph of gender of the siblings. (e) Find a point estimate for the proportion of male siblings in families where one of the children has SLE (f) Does the sample evidence suggest that the proportion of male siblings in families where one of the children has SLE is less than 0.51 , the accepted proportion of males born in the general population? Use the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (g) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of male siblings in a family where one of the children has SLE.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The study is observational and retrospective. There are 102 female siblings. Point estimate for the proportion of male siblings is 0.474. Further hypothesis testing and confidence interval calculations needed to determine significance at 0.05 and 95% confidence level.

Step by step solution

01

Why this is an observational study

An observational study is where researchers observe the effect of a variable without trying to change who is or isn't exposed to it. In this case, researchers are observing families with children who have SLE and the gender distribution of their siblings without any intervention.
02

Identify if the study is retrospective or prospective

The study is retrospective because it looks at historical birthing records and existing data on children with SLE and their siblings. The researchers are not setting up a study to follow these children into the future but are, instead, analyzing past records.
03

Calculate the number of female siblings

Given the total number of male siblings is 92, we calculate the total number of female siblings as follows. From the data given: 22 female siblings (males with SLE) + 80 female siblings (females with SLE) sums up to 102 female siblings.
04

Draw a relative frequency bar graph of gender of the siblings

A relative frequency bar graph represents the proportion of each category relative to the total. Calculate the relative frequency: \[ \text{Relative Frequency for Males} = \frac{92}{194} \approx 0.474 \] \[ \text{Relative Frequency for Females} = \frac{102}{194} \approx 0.526 \] The bar graph would have two bars, one for males (0.474) and one for females (0.526), on the y-axis with labels 'Males' and 'Females' on the x-axis.
05

Find a point estimate for the proportion of male siblings

The point estimate for the proportion of male siblings is calculated by dividing the number of male siblings by the total number of siblings. \[ \hat{p} = \frac{92}{194} \approx 0.474 \]
06

Determine if the sample evidence suggests a proportion less than 0.51

To determine if the proportion of male siblings is less than 0.51, conduct a hypothesis test. Set up the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis: \( H_0: p = 0.51 \) \( H_a: p < 0.51 \). Calculate the test statistic using: \[ z = \frac{\hat{p} - 0.51}{\sqrt{\frac{0.51 (1-0.51)}{n}}} \] Where \( \hat{p} \) is the sample proportion = 0.474, \( p \) is the population proportion = 0.51, and \( n \) is the sample size = 194. Compute\( z \) and compare it with the critical value for a 0.05 significance level. If \( z \) is less than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis.
07

Construct a 95% confidence interval

To construct a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of male siblings, use: \[ \hat{p} \pm Z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}} \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})}{n}} \] Where \( \hat{p} = 0.474 \), \( Z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}} = 1.96 \) for 95% confidence, and \( n = 194 \). Compute the margin of error and then the confidence interval.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational study
An observational study is a type of research where the investigator observes subjects and measures variables of interest without assigning treatments to the subjects. The essential feature of an observational study is that it investigates the relationship between variables without manipulation. In this specific case, researchers observed the families with children who have lupus (SLE) to study the gender distribution of their siblings. The researchers did not interfere with the families or their circumstances; they simply gathered existing data. This is a powerful method for understanding natural phenomena but it cannot establish causation since other underlying factors might affect the outcomes.
Retrospective study
A retrospective study looks backward in time, usually using medical records and interviews with patients who already have a known condition. This study on families with children who have SLE is retrospective because it analyzes pre-existing records of births. The researchers looked at data that had already been collected, rather than setting up an experiment and following subjects into the future. Conducting a retrospective study is efficient and cost-effective, but it can be limited by the accuracy and completeness of historical data.
Hypothesis testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental method in statistics used to determine the likelihood that a hypothesis about a population parameter is true, based on sample data. Here's how it's done in this study on SLE:
  • First, researchers set up a null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) that the proportion of male siblings is equal to the general population proportion of 0.51.
  • The alternative hypothesis (\( H_a \)) proposes that the proportion of male siblings is less than 0.51.
  • They then use a test statistic, in this case a z-score, to measure how far the sample proportion deviates from the null hypothesis proportion.
  • The critical value approach is used to make a decision: if the computed z-value is less than the critical value at a specified significance level, they reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. This steps helps determine whether the sample evidence suggests a lower proportion of male siblings in families where one child has SLE.
Point estimate
A point estimate provides a single value as an estimate of a population parameter. In this study, the point estimate for the proportion of male siblings is calculated as the number of male siblings divided by the total number of siblings. The formula for the point estimate \( \text{pj =} = \frac{92}{194} \text{approx 0.474} \). This point estimate suggests that out of the total number of siblings (194), approximately 47.4% are male. While a point estimate gives a quick snapshot, it does not indicate the uncertainty or variability associated with the estimate.
Confidence interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values that is likely to contain the population parameter, giving more information than a point estimate about the uncertainty. In this study, we construct a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of male siblings using the formula:
  • First, calculate the standard error of the point estimate
  • Use the Z-score for a 95% confidence level (\( Z_{\frac{\text{alpha}}{2}} = 1.96 \))
  • < br >
  • Combine these to form the interval:
  • \( 0.474 \text{ pm} 1.96 \text{ sqrt} \frac{0.474 (1 - 0.474)}{194}\)
  • Compute the margin of error and determine the interval. The resulting confidence interval gives a range of values that, with 95% confidence, includes the true proportion of male siblings for families with a child with SLE, providing a more comprehensive understanding than a single point estimate.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To test \(H_{0}: p=0.30\) versus \(H_{1}: p<0.30,\) a simple random sample of \(n=300\) individuals is obtained and \(x=86\) successes are observed. (a) What does it mean to make a Type II error for this test? (b) If the researcher decides to test this hypothesis at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance, compute the probability of making a Type II error if the true population proportion is \(0.28 .\) What is the power of the test? (c) Redo part (b) if the true population proportion is 0.25 .

NCAA rules require the circumference of a softball to be \(12 \pm 0.125\) inches. Suppose that the NCAA also requires that the standard deviation of the softball circumferences not exceed 0.05 inch. A representative from the NCAA believes the manufacturer does not meet this requirement. She collects a random sample of 20 softballs from the production line and finds that \(s=0.09\) inch. Is there enough evidence to support the representative's belief at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance?

The headline reporting the results of a poll conducted by the Gallup organization stated "Majority of Americans at Personal Best in the Morning." The results indicated that a survey of 1100 Americans resulted in \(55 \%\) stating they were at their personal best in the morning. The poll's results were reported with a margin of error of \(3 \% .\) Explain why the Gallup organization's headline is accurate.

Reading at Bedtime It is well-documented that watching TV, working on a computer, or any other activity involving artificial light can be harmful to sleep patterns. Researchers wanted to determine if the artificial light from e-Readers also disrupted sleep. In the study, 12 young adults were given either an iPad or printed book for four hours before bedtime. Then, they switched reading devices. Whether the individual received the iPad or book first was determined randomly. Bedtime was \(10 \mathrm{P.M}\). and the time to fall asleep was measured each evening. It was found that participants took an average of 10 minutes longer to fall asleep after reading on an iPad. The \(P\) -value for the test was \(0.009 .\) (a) What is the research objective? (b) What is the response variable? It is quantitative or qualitative? (c) What is the treatment? (d) Is this a designed experiment or observational study? What type? (e) The null hypothesis for this test would be that there is no difference in time to fall asleep with an e-Reader and printed book. The alternative is that there is a difference. Interpret the \(P\) -value.

Ready for College? The ACT is a college entrance exam. ACT has determined that a score of 22 on the mathematics portion of the ACT suggests that a student is ready for college-level mathematics. To achieve this goal, ACT recommends that students take a core curriculum of math courses: Algebra I, Algebra II, and Geometry. Suppose a random sample of 200 students who completed this core set of courses results in a mean ACT math score of 22.6 with a standard deviation of \(3.9 .\) Do these results suggest that students who complete the core curriculum are ready for college-level mathematics? That is, are they scoring above 22 on the math portion of the ACT? (a) State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Verify that the requirements to perform the test using the \(t\) -distribution are satisfied. (c) Use the classical or \(P\) -value approach at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance to test the hypotheses in part (a). (d) Write a conclusion based on your results to part (c).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.