/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q72SE Question: Piercing rating of fe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Question:Piercing rating of fencing safety jackets. A manufacturer produces safety jackets for competitive fencers. These jackets are rated by the minimum force, in newtons, that will allow a weapon to pierce the jacket. When this process is operating correctly, it produces jackets that have ratings with an average of 840 newtons and a standard deviation of 15 newtons. FIE, the international governing body for fencing, requires jackets to be rated at a minimum of 800 newtons. To check whether the process is operating correctly, a manager takes a sample of 50 jackets from the process, rates them, and calculatesx¯, the mean rating for jackets in the sample. She assumes that the standard deviation of the process is fixed but is worried that the mean rating of the process may have changed.

a. What is the sampling distribution of x¯if the process is still operating correctly?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The sampling distribution ofx¯ has mean 840 and sd 2.121.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Let x be the rating process.

The sample size is 50.

A manufacturer produces jackets with an average 840 newtons and standard deviation 15 newtons.

02

Sampling distribution

A sampling distribution is a statistical probability distribution derived from repeated sampling of a given population. It represents a population's range of probable outcomes for a statistic, like the average or mode of certain variable. The vast majority of the information evaluated by academics are samples rather than populations.

03

Sampling distributions of  x¯

The mean is given by

μx¯=840

The s.d is given by

σX¯=σn=1550=2.121

Therefore, the mean and sd are 840 and 2.121.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Tomato as a taste modifier. Miraculin is a protein naturally produced in a rare tropical fruit that can convert a sour taste into a sweet taste. Refer to the Plant Science (May 2010) investigation of the ability of a hybrid tomato plant to produce miraculin, Exercise 4.99 (p. 263). Recall that the amount x of miraculin produced in the plant had a mean of 105.3 micrograms per gram of fresh weight with a standard deviation of 8.0. Consider a random sample of n=64hybrid tomato plants and letx represent the sample mean amount of miraculin produced. Would you expect to observe a value of X less than 103 micrograms per gram of fresh weight? Explain.

Question:A random sample of n = 500 observations is selected from a binomial population with p = .35.

a. Give the mean and standard deviation of the (repeated) sampling distribution ofp^the sample proportion of successes for the 500 observations.

b. Describe the shape of the sampling distribution of p^. Does your answer depend on the sample size?

Suppose a random sample of n measurements is selected from a population with u=100mean and variance role="math" localid="1657967387987" σ2=100. For each of the following values of n, give the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean.

  1. role="math" localid="1657967260825" n=4
  2. n=25
  3. n=100
  4. n=50
  5. n=500
  6. n=1000

Fecal pollution at Huntington Beach. California mandates fecal indicator bacteria monitoring at all public beaches. When the concentration of fecal bacteria in the water exceeds a certain limit (400 colony-forming units of fecal coliform per 100 millilitres), local health officials must post a sign (called surf zone posting) warning beachgoers of potential health risks. For fecal bacteria, the state uses a single-sample standard; if the fecal limit is exceeded in a single sample of water, surf zone posting is mandatory. This single-sample standard policy has led to a recent rash of beach closures in California. A study of the surf water quality at Huntington Beach in California was published in Environmental Science & Technology (September 2004). The researchers found that beach closings were occurring despite low pollution levels in some instances, while in others, signs were not posted when the fecal limit was exceeded. They attributed these "surf zone posting errors" to the variable nature of water quality in the surf zone (for example, fecal bacteria concentration tends to be higher during ebb tide and at night) and the inherent time delay between when a water sample is collected and when a sign is posted or removed. To prevent posting errors, the researchers recommend using an averaging method rather than a single sample to determine unsafe water quality. (For example, one simple averaging method is to take a random sample of multiple water specimens and compare the average fecal bacteria level of the sample with the limit of 400 CFU/100 mL to determine whether the water is safe.) Discuss the pros and cons of using the single sample standard versus the averaging method. Part of your discussion should address the probability of posting a sign when the water is safe and the probability of posting a sign when the water is unsafe. (Assume that the fecal bacteria concentrations of water specimens at Huntington Beach follow an approximately normal distribution.

Video game players and divided attention tasks. Human Factors (May 2014) published the results of a study designed to determine whether video game players are better than non–video game players at crossing the street when presented with distractions. Participants (college students) entered a street-crossing simulator. The simulator was designed to have cars traveling at various high rates of speed in both directions. During the crossing, the students also performed a memory task as a distraction. The researchers found that students who are video game players took an average of 5.1 seconds to cross the street, with a standard deviation of .8 second. Assume that the time, x, to cross the street for the population of video game players has , Now consider a sample of 30 students and let x represent the sample mean time (in seconds) to cross the street in the simulator.

a. Find Px¯>5.5

b. The 30 students in the sample are all non–video game players. What inference can you make about and/or for the population of non–video game players? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.