/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.61E Question: Revenues of popular mo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Question: Revenues of popular movies. The Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com) monitors the gross revenues for all major motion pictures. The table on the next page gives both the domestic (United States and Canada) and international gross revenues for a sample of 25 popular movies.

  1. Write a first-order model for foreign gross revenues (y) as a function of domestic gross revenues (x).
  2. Write a second-order model for international gross revenues y as a function of domestic gross revenues x.
  3. Construct a scatterplot for these data. Which of the models from parts a and b appears to be the better choice for explaining the variation in foreign gross revenues?
  4. Fit the model of part b to the data and investigate its usefulness. Is there evidence of a curvilinear relationship between international and domestic gross revenues? Try usingα=0.05.
  5. Based on your analysis in part d, which of the models from parts a and b better explains the variation in international gross revenues? Compare your answer with your preliminary conclusion from part c.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer:

  1. The first-order model equation for foreign gross revenues (y) as a function of domestic gross revenues (x) can be written asy=β0+β1x+ε.
  2. The second-order model equation for international gross revenues as a function of domestic gross revenue (x) can be written asy=β0+β1x+β1x2+ε.
  3. Looking at the graph, it is visible that there is a curvilinear relation between foreign gross revenues (y) and domestic gross revenues (x). Hence, it would be appropriate to fit a second-order model equation to the data.
  4. The model equation here becomesy=-322.95+2.8874x-0.000988x2and at 95% confidence level,β2=0this means that the parabola doesn’t have a curvature and it essentially is a straight line.
  5. From part d, it is concluded that the curvilinear relation between x and y does not exist. Hence, the model the part a where a first-order model equation is fitted to the data is better to explain the variation in the international gross revenue. In part c, it was concluded from the graph that I curvilinear relationship between x and y might exist however, a linear relationship is a better option.

Step by step solution

01

First-order model equation

The first-order model equation for foreign gross revenues (y) as a function of domestic gross revenues (x) can be written asy=β0+β1x+ε .

02

Second-order model equation

The second-order model equation for international gross revenues as a function of domestic gross revenue (x) can be written as y=β0+β1x+β1x2+ε.

03

Scatterplot and model fit for the data

Movie Title (year)

International Gross

Domestic Gross

x2

Star Wars VII (2015)

1122

936.4

876845

Avatar (2009)

2023.4

760.5

578360.3

Jurassic World (2015)

1018.1

652.2

425364.8

Titanic (1997)

1548.9

658.7

433885.7

The Dark Knight (2008)

469.5

533.3

284408.9

Pirates of the Caribbean (2006)

642.9

423.3

179182.9

E.T.(1982)

357.9

434.9

189138

Spider-Man (2002)

418

403.7

162973.7

Frozen (2013)

873.5

400.7

160560.5

Jurassic Park (1993)

643.1

395.7

156578.5

Furious 7 (2015)

1163

351

123201

Lion King (1994)

564.7

422.8

178759.8

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001)

657.2

317.6

100869.8

Inception (2010)

540

292.6

85614.76

Sixth Sense (1999)

379.3

293.5

86142.25

The jungle book (2016)

491.2

292.6

85614.76

The Hangover (2009)

201.6

277.3

76895.29

Jaws (1975)

210.6

260

67600

Ghost (1990)

300

217.6

47349.76

Saving Private Ryan (1998)

263.2

216.1

46699.21

Gladiator (2000)

268.6

187.7

35231.29

Dances with wolves (1990)

240

184.2

33929.64

The Exorcist (1973)

153

204.6

41861.16

My Big Fat Greek Wedding (2002)

115.1

241.4

58273.96

Rocky IV (1985)

172.6

127.9

16358.41

Looking at the graph, it is visible that there is a curvilinear relation between foreign gross revenues (y) and domestic gross revenues (x). Hence, it would be appropriate to fit a second-order model equation to the data.

04

Model equation and significance of β2

The excel output is attached here

SUMMARY OUTPUT

















Regression Statistics








Multiple R

0.802142835








R Square

0.643433127








Adjusted R Square

0.611017957








Standard Error

293.541447








Observations

25

















ANOVA









df

SS

MS

F

Significance F




Regression

2

3420771

1710385

19.84975

1.18E-05




Residual

22

1895665

86166.58






Total

24

5316436













Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Lower 95%

Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

Intercept

-322.9500969

285.3873

-1.13162

0.269979

-914.807

268.907

-914.807

268.907

Domestic Gross

2.887488271

1.321995

2.184189

0.039893

0.145838

5.629139

0.145838

5.629139


-0.000988686

0.00129

-0.76639

0.451591

-0.00366

0.001687

-0.00366

0.001687

The model equation here becomesy=-322.95+2.8874x-0.000988x2

To check for the curvilinear relationship between variable x and y

H0:β2=0Ha:β2≠0

Here, t-test statistic=β2^sβ2=-0.0009880.00129=-0.7658

Value oft0.05,385is 2.069

is rejected if t statistic > . Forα=0.05, since t <t0.05,385

Not sufficient evidence to reject at 95% confidence interval.

Therefore, β2=0

This means that the parabola doesn’t have a curvature and it essentially is a straight line.

05

Interpretation of variations in international gross revenue

From part d, it is concluded that the curvilinear relation between x and y does not exist. Hence, the model the part a where a first-order model equation is fitted to the data is better to explain the variation in the international gross revenue. In part c, it was concluded from the graph that I curvilinear relationship between x and y might exist however, a linear relationship is a better option.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Identify the problem(s) in each of the residual plots shown below.

Question: There are six independent variables, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, and x6, that might be useful in predicting a response y. A total of n = 50 observations is available, and it is decided to employ stepwise regression to help in selecting the independent variables that appear to be useful. The software fits all possible one-variable models of the form

where xi is the ith independent variable, i = 1, 2, …, 6. The information in the table is provided from the computer printout.

E(Y)=β0+β1xi

a. Which independent variable is declared the best one variable predictor of y? Explain.

b. Would this variable be included in the model at this stage? Explain.

c. Describe the next phase that a stepwise procedure would execute.

Question: Consider the model:

y=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+ε

where x1 is a quantitative variable and x2 and x3 are dummy variables describing a qualitative variable at three levels using the coding scheme

role="math" localid="1649846492724" x2=1   iflevel 20  otherwise       x3=1   if level 30   otherwise

The resulting least squares prediction equation is y^=44.8+2.2x1+9.4x2+15.6x3

a. What is the response line (equation) for E(y) when x2 = x3 = 0? When x2 = 1 and x3 = 0? When x2 = 0 and x3 = 1?

b. What is the least squares prediction equation associated with level 1? Level 2? Level 3? Plot these on the same graph.

Question: Accuracy of software effort estimates. Periodically, software engineers must provide estimates of their effort in developing new software. In the Journal of Empirical Software Engineering (Vol. 9, 2004), multiple regression was used to predict the accuracy of these effort estimates. The dependent variable, defined as the relative error in estimating effort, y = (Actual effort - Estimated effort)/ (Actual effort) was determined for each in a sample of n = 49 software development tasks. Eight independent variables were evaluated as potential predictors of relative error using stepwise regression. Each of these was formulated as a dummy variable, as shown in the table.

Company role of estimator: x1 = 1 if developer, 0 if project leader

Task complexity: x2 = 1 if low, 0 if medium/high

Contract type: x3 = 1 if fixed price, 0 if hourly rate

Customer importance: x4 = 1 if high, 0 if low/medium

Customer priority: x5 = 1 if time of delivery, 0 if cost or quality

Level of knowledge: x6 = 1 if high, 0 if low/medium

Participation: x7 = 1 if estimator participates in work, 0 if not

Previous accuracy: x8 = 1 if more than 20% accurate, 0 if less than 20% accurate

a. In step 1 of the stepwise regression, how many different one-variable models are fit to the data?

b. In step 1, the variable x1 is selected as the best one- variable predictor. How is this determined?

c. In step 2 of the stepwise regression, how many different two-variable models (where x1 is one of the variables) are fit to the data?

d. The only two variables selected for entry into the stepwise regression model were x1 and x8. The stepwise regression yielded the following prediction equation:

Give a practical interpretation of the β estimates multiplied by x1 and x8.

e) Why should a researcher be wary of using the model, part d, as the final model for predicting effort (y)?

Assertiveness and leadership. Management professors at Columbia University examined the relationship between assertiveness and leadership (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, February 2007). The sample represented 388 people enrolled in a full-time MBA program. Based on answers to a questionnaire, the researchers measured two variables for each subject: assertiveness score (x) and leadership ability score (y). A quadratic regression model was fit to the data, with the following results:

a. Conduct a test of overall model utility. Useα=0.05 .

b. The researchers hypothesized that leadership ability increases at a decreasing rate with assertiveness. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses to test this theory.

  1. Use the reported results to conduct the test, part b. Give your conclusion(atα=0.05 )in the words of the problem.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.