/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q54E Business sign conservation. The ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Business sign conservation. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) lately issued new guidelines for maintaining and replacing business signs. Civil masterminds at North Carolina State University studied the effectiveness of colorful sign conservation practices developed to cleave to the new guidelines and published the results in the Journal of Transportation Engineering (June 2013). One portion of the study concentrated on the proportion of business signs that fail the minimal FHWA retro-reflectivity conditions. Of signs maintained by the. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), .512 were supposed failures. Of signs maintained by. County- possessed roads in North Carolina, 328 were supposed. Failures. Conduct a test of the thesis to determine whether the true proportions of business signs that fail the minimal FHWA retro-reflectivity conditions differ depending on whether the signs are maintained by the NCDOT or by the county. Test using 伪 = .05

Short Answer

Expert verified

The null hypothesis is rejected at 伪 = 0.05.

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step Solution Step 1: Check the true proportions of traffic signs

Check whether the true proportions of traffic signs that fail the minimum FHWA retro-reflectivity requirements differ depending on whether the signs are maintained by the NCDOT or by the county.

The test hypotheses are given below:

Null hypothesis:

H鈧: P鈧-P鈧= 0

The true proportions of traffic signs that fall under the minimum FHWA retro-reflectivity requirements do not differ depending on whether the signs are maintained by the NCDOT or the county.

Alternative hypothesis:

Ha:P1P20

The true proportions of traffic signs that fall under the minimum FHWA retro-reflectivity requirements differ depending on whether the signs are maintained by the NCDOT or the county.

02

Use MINITAB

Use MINITAB to obtain the test statistic and p-value for the difference.

MINITAB procedure:

Step 1: Select stat > Basic Statistics > 2 proportions.

Step 2: Select Epitomized data

Step 3: In the First sample, enter Trials and Events as 512.

Step 4: In the Second sample, enter Trials and Events as 328.

Step 5: Check Perform thesis test in Hypothecated proportion, enter 0.

Step 6: Check Options and enter the Confidence position as 95.0.

Step 7: Select not equal in indispensable

Step 8: Click OK in all dialogue boxes.

03

Minitab Output

MINITAB output

Test and CI for Two Proportions

Difference = p (1) 鈥 p (2)

Estimate for difference: 0.184

95% CI for difference: (0.141497, 0.226503)

Test for difference = 0 (vs 鈮 0): z = 8.34 p-value = 0.00

Fisher`s exact test: p 鈥 value = 0.0000

From the MINITAB output, the value test statistic is 8.34, and the p-value is 0.0000

04

Rejection rule

If the p-value <a, then reject the null hypothesis.

Conclusion:

Here, the p-value is less than the level of significance.

That is, p-value (=0.000) <a=0.05)

Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected at 2 = 0.05

Thus, it can be concluded that the true proportions of traffic signs that fall under the minimum FHWA retro-reflectivity requirements differ depending on whether the signs are maintained by the NCDOT or by the county.

05

Final answer

The null hypothesis is rejected at 伪 = 0.05.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Given that x is a random variable for which a Poisson probability distribution provides a good approximation, use statistical software to find the following:

a.P(x2) when =1

b.P(x2) when =2

c.P(x2) when =3

d. What happens to the probability of the event {x2} as it increases from 1 to 3? Is this intuitively reasonable?

Gouges on a spindle. A tool-and-die machine shop produces extremely high-tolerance spindles. The spindles are 18-inch slender rods used in a variety of military equipment. A piece of equipment used in the manufacture of the spindles malfunctions on occasion and places a single gouge somewhere on the spindle. However, if the spindle can be cut so that it has 14 consecutive inches without a gouge, then the spindle can be salvaged for other purposes. Assuming that the location of the gouge along the spindle is random, what is the probability that a defective spindle can be salvaged?

The gender diversity of a large corporation鈥檚 board of directors was studied in Accounting & Finance (December 2015). In particular, the researchers wanted to know whether firms with a nominating committee would appoint more female directors than firms without a nominating committee. One of the key variables measured at each corporation was the percentage of female board directors. In a sample of 491firms with a nominating committee, the mean percentage was 7.5%; in an independent sample of 501firms without a nominating committee, the mean percentage was role="math" localid="1652702402701" 4.3% .

a. To answer the research question, the researchers compared the mean percentage of female board directors at firms with a nominating committee with the corresponding percentage at firms without a nominating committee using an independent samples test. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses for this test.

b. The test statistic was reported as z=5.1 with a corresponding p-value of 0.0001. Interpret this result if 伪=0.05.

c. Do the population percentages for each type of firm need to be normally distributed for the inference, part b, to be valid? Why or why not?

d. To assess the practical significance of the test, part b, construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the true mean percentages at firms with and without a nominating committee. Interpret the result.

Question: Two independent random samples have been selected鈥100 observations from population 1 and 100 from population 2. Sample means x1=26.6,x2= 15.5 were obtained. From previous experience with these populations, it is known that the variances are12=9and22=16 .

a. Find (x1-x2).

b. Sketch the approximate sampling distribution for (x1-x2), assuming (1-2)=10.

c. Locate the observed value of (x1-x2)the graph you drew in part

b. Does it appear that this value contradicts the null hypothesis H0:(1-2)=10?

d. Use the z-table to determine the rejection region for the test againstH0:(1-2)10. Use=0.5.

e. Conduct the hypothesis test of part d and interpret your result.

f. Construct a confidence interval for 1-2. Interpret the interval.

g. Which inference provides more information about the value of 1-2鈥 the test of hypothesis in part e or the confidence interval in part f?

Assume that 12=蟽22=蟽2. Calculate the pooled estimator 2 for each of the following cases:

a.s12=120,s22=100,n1=n2=25

b.s12=12,s22=20,n1=20,n2=10

c.s12=.15,s22=.20,n1=6,n2=10

d.s12=3000,s22=2500,n1=16,n2=17

Note that the pooled estimate is a weighted average of the sample variances. To which of the variances does the pooled estimate fall nearer in each of the above cases?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.