/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q19E Accounting and Machiavellianism.... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Accounting and Machiavellianism. Refer to the Behavioral Research in Accounting (January 2008) study of Machiavellian traits in accountants, Exercise 1.33 (p. 52). Recall that Machiavellian describes negative character traits that include manipulation, cunning, duplicity, deception, and bad faith. A Machiavellian (鈥淢ach鈥) rating score was determined for each in a sample of accounting alumni of a large southwestern university. Scores range from a low of 40 to a high of 160, with the theoretical neutral Mach rating score of 100. The 122 purchasing managers in the sample had a mean Mach rating score of 99.6, with a standard deviation of 12.6.

a. From the sample, estimate the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers.

b. Form a 95% confidence interval for the estimate, part b.

c. Give a practical interpretation of the interval, part c.

d. A director of purchasing at a major firm claims that the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers is 85. Is there evidence to dispute this claim? From the given information we have 122 purchasing managers in the sample had a mean Mach rating score of 99.6, with a standard deviation of 12.6.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.The true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers is 99.6.

b. The 95% confidence interval for true mean is (97.364 ,101.839).

c. It can conclude that it is 95% confident that the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers will lie between 97.364 and 101.839.

d. Because Mach rating score belong to the 95% confidence interval for the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

It is given that 122 purchasing managers in the sample had a mean Mach rating score of 99.6, with a standard deviation of 12.6. i.e.n=122,x=99.6,=12.6

02

Estimating the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers

a.

Since, sample mean is unbiased estimator of population mean.

So, the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers is

=x=99.6

03

Calculating the 95% confidence interval

b.

The 95% confidence interval for population mean is given by

x-E<<x+E

The above figure shows that the area in each of the red-shaded tails is2=0.025

Now, find z2=1.96by noting that the cumulative area to its left must be 1-0.025 or 0.975.

Now, refer to the standard normal table values to find the area of 0.975 corresponds toz=1.96

For the 95% confidence level, the critical value is thereforez2=1.96

To find the critical z score for the 95% confidence level, look up 0.975 in the body of the table.

Now, the margin of error is calculated by using the following formula:

E=z2nwith z2=1.96

E=1.9612.6122=1.961.1408=2.236

Simply substitute and E in the general format for confidence interval is as follows:

x-E<<x+E99.6-2.2359<<99.6+2.235997.364<<101.839

04

Interpretation

c.

It can conclude that it is 95% confident that the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers will lie between 97.364 and 101.839.

05

Checking the evidence 

d.

Given that a director of purchasing at a major firm claims that the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers is 85.

The evidence that the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers is 85.

Because Mach rating score belong to the 95% confidence interval for the true mean Mach rating score of all purchasing managers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A random sample of 90 observations produced a mean x = 25.9 and a standard deviation s = 2.7.

a. Find an approximate 95% confidence interval for the population mean

b. Find an approximate 90% confidence interval for

c. Find an approximate 99% confidence interval for

Radon exposure in Egyptian tombs. Refer to the Radiation Protection Dosimetry (December 2010) study of radon exposure in tombs carved from limestone in the Egyptian Valley of Kings, Exercise 6.30 (p. 349). The radon levels in the inner chambers of a sample of 12 tombs were determined, yielding the following summary statistics: x=3643Bq/m3and s=4487Bq/m3. Use this information to estimate, with 95% confidence, the true standard deviation of radon levels in tombs in the Valley of Kings. Interpret the resulting interval.

Improving the productivity of chickens. Farmers have discovered that the more domestic chickens peck at objects placed in their environment, the healthier and more productive the chickens seem to be. White string has been found to be a particularly attractive pecking stimulus. In one experiment, 72 chickens were exposed to a string stimulus. Instead of white string, blue-colored string was used. The number of pecks each chicken took at the blue string over a specified time interval was recorded. Summary statistics for the 72 chickens were x = 1.13 pecks, s = 2.21 pecks (Applied Animal Behavior Science, October 2000).

a. Estimate population mean number of pecks made by chickens pecking at blue string using a 99% confidence interval. Interpret the result.

b. Previous research has shown that = 7.5 pecks if chickens are exposed to white string. Based on the results, part a, is there evidence that chickens are more apt to peck at white string than blue string? Explain.

Question: The mean and standard deviation of a random sample of n measurements are equal to 33.9 and 3.3, respectively.

a. Find a 95% confidence interval for if n = 100.

b. Find a 95% confidence interval for if n = 400.

c. Find the widths of the confidence intervals found in parts a and b. What is the effect on the width of a confidence interval of quadrupling the sample size while holding the confidence coefficient fixed?

FindZ/2for each of the following:

a.= .10

b.= .01

c.= .05

d.= .20

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.