/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 55E Splinting in mountain climbing a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Splinting in mountain climbing accidents. The most common injury that occurs among mountain climbers is trauma to the lower extremity (leg). Consequently, rescuers must be proficient in immobilizing and splinting fractures. In High Altitude Medicine & Biology (Vol. 10, 2009), researchers examined the likelihood of mountain climbers needing certain types of splints. A Scottish Mountain Rescue study reported that there was 1 femoral shaft splint needed among 333 live casualties. The researchers will use this study to estimate the proportion of all mountain casualties that require a femoral shaft splint.

a. Is the sample large enough to apply the large-sample estimation method of this section? Show why or why not.

b. Use Wilson鈥檚 adjustment to find a 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of all mountain casualties that require a femoral shaft splint. Interpret the result

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. No,The sample is not large enough to estimate the population proportion.

b.The 95% confidence interval for the true proportion is 0,0.0190,0.019.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The most common injury that occurs among mountain climbers is trauma to the lower extremity, there was 1 femoral shaft splint needed among 333 live casualties

02

Checking whether this sample is large enough to apply the large sample method

a.

Let p be the proportion of all-mountain casualties femoral shaft splint needed.

p^=xn=1333=0.003p^=0.003

Since p is near 0, an extremely larger sample is required to estimate it by the usual large-sample method.

Here, the number of successes 1, is less than 15.

So, the sample is not large enough to estimate the population proportion.

03

95% confidence interval for the true proportion

b.

Using Wilson鈥檚 adjustment,

The adjusted sample proportion is,

p%=x+2n+4=1+2333+4=3337=0.0089

Using Wilson鈥檚 adjustment, the 95% confidence interval for true proportion is,

p%z2p%1-p%n+4=0.0089z0.0250.00891-0.0089333+4=0.00891.9600.0088337UsingStandardNormalTable=0.00891.9600.0051=0.00890.0099=-0.001,0.0188

Here, p cannot be negative.

So, the 95% confidence interval for the true proportion is 0,0.019.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fish contaminated by a plant鈥檚 discharge. Refer (Example 1.5, p. 38) to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers data on a sample of 144 contaminated fish collected from the river adjacent to a chemical plant. Estimate the proportion of contaminated fish that are of the channel catfish species. Use a 90% confidence interval and interpret the result.

Scallops, sampling, and the law. Interfaces (March鈥揂pril 1995) presented the case of a ship that fishes for scallops off the coast of New England. In order to protect baby scallops from being harvested, the U.S. Fisheries and Wildlife Service requires that 鈥渢he average meat per scallop weigh at least 136 of a pound.鈥 The ship was accused of violating this weight standard. Author Arnold Barnett lays out the scenario:

The vessel arrived at a Massachusetts port with 11,000 bags of scallops, from which the harbormaster randomly selected 18 bags for weighing. From each such bag, his agents took a large scoopful of scallops; then, to estimate the bag鈥檚 average meat per scallop, they divided the total weight of meat in the scoopful by the number of scallops it contained. Based on the 18 [numbers] thus generated, the harbormaster estimated that each of the ship鈥檚 scallops possessed an average of 139 of a pound of meat (that is, they were about seven percent lighter than the minimum requirement). Viewing this outcome as conclusive evidence that the weight standard had been violated, federal authorities at once confiscated 95 percent of the catch (which they then sold at auction). The fishing voyage was thus transformed into a financial catastrophe for its participants. The actual scallop weight measurements for each of the 18 sampled bags are listed in the table below. For ease of exposition, Barnett expressed each number as a multiple of of a pound, the minimum permissible average weight per scallop. Consequently, numbers below 1 indicate individual bags that do not meet the standard. The ship鈥檚 owner filed a lawsuit against the federal government, declaring that his vessel had fully complied with the weight standard. A Boston law firm was hired to represent the owner in legal proceedings, and Barnett was retained by the firm to provide statistical litigation support and, if necessary, expert witness testimony.

0.93

0.88

0.85

0.91

0.91

0.84

0.90

0.98

0.88

0.89

0.98

0.87

0.91

0.92

0.99

1.14

1.06

0.93

  1. Recall that the harbormaster sampled only 18 of the ship鈥檚 11,000 bags of scallops. One of the questions the lawyers asked Barnett was, 鈥淐an a reliable estimate of the mean weight of all the scallops be obtained from a sample of size 18?鈥 Give your opinion on this issue.
  2. As stated in the article, the government鈥檚 decision rule is to confiscate a catch if the sample mean weight of the scallops is less than 136 of a pound. Do you see any flaws in this rule?
  3. Develop your own procedure for determining whether a ship is in violation of the minimum-weight restriction. Apply your rule to the data. Draw a conclusion about the ship in question.

Do social robots walk or roll? Refer to the International Conference on Social Robotics (Vol. 6414, 2010) study of the trend in the design of social robots, Exercise 5.44 (p. 320). The researchers obtained a random sample of 106 social robots through a Web search and determined that 63 were designed with legs, but no wheels.

a. Find a 99% confidence interval for the proportion of all social robots designed with legs but no wheels. Interpret the result.

b. In Exercise 5.42, you assumed that 40% of all social robots are designed with legs but no wheels. Comment on the validity of this assumption.

Radon exposure in Egyptian tombs. Refer to the Radiation Protection Dosimetry (December 2010) study of radon exposure in tombs carved from limestone in the Egyptian Valley of Kings, Exercise 6.30 (p. 349). The radon levels in the inner chambers of a sample of 12 tombs were determined, yielding the following summary statistics: x=3643Bq/m3and s=4487Bq/m3. Use this information to estimate, with 95% confidence, the true standard deviation of radon levels in tombs in the Valley of Kings. Interpret the resulting interval.

The following is a 90% confidence interval for p:(0.26, 0.54). How large was the sample used to construct thisinterval?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.