/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q76E For safety reasons, calf dehorni... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For safety reasons, calf dehorning has become a routine practice at dairy farms. A report by Europe’s Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health (SANKO) stated that 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning. A later study, published in the Journal of Dairy Science (Vol. 94,2011), found that in a sample of 639 Italian dairy farms, 515 dehorned calves. Does the Journal of Dairy Science study support or refute the figure reported by SANKO? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

We have sufficient evidence to support the figure reported by SANKO that 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

As per the report published by SANKO, 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning.

As per the Journal of Dairy Science (Vol. 94, 2011), out of 639 Italian dairy farms, 515 dehorned calves.

That is

The size of the sample isn=639

The sample proportion is

p^=515639=0.806

Wherep^ is the sample proportion of Italian dairy farms out calf dehorning.

02

Setting up the hypotheses

We have to test the claim reported by SANKO that 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning by using the survey published in the Journal of Dairy Science.

The null and alternative hypotheses are given as

H0:p=0.80

That is, the true proportion of Italian dairy farms that carry out calf dehorning is 80%.

And

Ha:p≠0.80

That is, the proportion of Italian dairy farms carrying out calf dehorning is different from

03

Calculating the test statistic

The test statistic for testing these hypotheses is

Z=p^-pp1-pn=0.806-0.800.801-0.80639=0.0060.0002504=0.38

04

Calculating the critical value

Assume

α:The level of significance (chance of making a type I error)

α=.05

Using the standard normal table, the critical value at the 5% significance level is 1.96.

We can see that

Z=0.38<1.96

Hence, we failed to reject the null hypothesis.

05

Conclusion

At a 5% significance level, we have sufficient evidence to support the figure reported by SANKO that 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Minimizing tractor skidding distance. Refer to the Journal of Forest Engineering (July 1999) study of minimizing tractor skidding distances along a new road in a European forest, Exercise 6.37 (p. 350). The skidding distances (in meters) were measured at 20 randomly selected road sites. The data are repeated below. Recall that a logger working on the road claims the mean skidding distance is at least 425 meters. Is there sufficient evidence to refute this claim? Use \(\alpha = .10\)

Consumer Reports evaluated and rated 46 brands of toothpaste. One attribute examined in the study was whether or not a toothpastebrand carries an American Dental Association (ADA) seal verifying effective decay prevention. The data for the 46 brands (coded 1 = ADA seal, 0 = no ADA seal) are listed here.

a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing whether the true proportion of toothpaste brands with the ADA seal verifying effective decay prevention is less than .5.

b. Locate the p-value on the Minitab printout below

c. Make the appropriate conclusion usingα=.10

A simple random sample of 25 observations was selected from a normal population. The mean and standard deviation of this sample are 20 and 5, respectively.

a. Test H0:μ=22against Ha:μ≠22at the 10% significance level.

b. Test H0:μ≥22against H0:μ≤22at the 1% significance level.

For each of the following rejection regions, sketch the sampling distribution for z and indicate the location of the rejection region.

a. \({H_0}:\mu \le {\mu _0}\) and \({H_a}:\mu > {\mu _0};\alpha = 0.1\)

b. \({H_0}:\mu \le {\mu _0}\) and \({H_a}:\mu > {\mu _0};\alpha = 0.05\)

c. \({H_0}:\mu \ge {\mu _0}\) and \({H_a}:\mu < {\mu _0};\alpha = 0.01\)

d. \({H_0}:\mu = {\mu _0}\) and \({H_a}:\mu \ne {\mu _0};\alpha = 0.05\)

e. \({H_0}:\mu = {\mu _0}\) and \({H_a}:\mu \ne {\mu _0};\alpha = 0.1\)

f. \({H_0}:\mu = {\mu _0}\) and \({H_a}:\mu \ne {\mu _0};\alpha = 0.01\)

g. For each rejection region specified in parts a–f, state the probability notation in z and its respective Type I error value.

Question: Water distillation with solar energy. In countries with a water shortage, converting salt water to potable water is big business. The standard method of water distillation is with a single-slope solar still. Several enhanced solar energy water distillation systems were investigated in Applied Solar Energy (Vol. 46, 2010). One new system employs a sun-tracking meter and a step-wise basin. The new system was tested over 3 randomly selected days at a location in Amman, Jordan. The daily amounts of distilled water collected by the new system over the 3 days were 5.07, 5.45, and 5.21 litres per square meter ( l / m2 ). Suppose it is known that the mean daily amount of distilled water collected by the standard method at the same location in Jordan is µ = 1.4 / I m2.

a. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses for determining whether the mean daily amount of distilled water collected by the new system is greater than 1.4.

b. For this test, give a practical interpretation of the value α = 0.10.

c. Find the mean and standard deviation of the distilled water amounts for the sample of 3 days.

d. Use the information from part c to calculate the test statistic.

e. Find the observed significance level (p-value) of the test.

f. State, practically, the appropriate conclusion.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.