/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q17E Jury trial outcomes. Sometimes, ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Jury trial outcomes. Sometimes, the outcome of a jury trial defies the 鈥渃ommon sense鈥 expectations of the general public (e.g., the 1995 O. J. Simpson verdict and the 2011 Casey Anthony verdict). Such a verdict is more acceptable if we understand that the jury trial of an accused murderer is analogous to the statistical hypothesis-testing process. The null hypothesis in a jury trial is that the accused is innocent. (The status-quo hypothesis in the U.S. system of justice is innocence, which is assumed to be true until proven beyond a reasonable doubt.) The alternative hypothesis is guilt, which is accepted only when sufficient evidence exists to establish its truth. If the vote of the jury is unanimous in favor of guilt, the null hypothesis of innocence is rejected, and the court concludes that the accused murderer is guilty. Any vote other than a unanimous one for guilt results in a 鈥渘ot guilty鈥 verdict. The court never accepts the null hypothesis; that is, the court never declares the accused 鈥渋nnocent.鈥 A 鈥渘ot guilty鈥 verdict (as in the Casey Anthony case) implies that the court could not find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt

a. Define Type I and Type II errors in a murder trial.

b. Which of the two errors is the more serious? Explain.

c. The court does not, in general, know the values of and ; but ideally, both should be small. One of these probabilities is assumed to be smaller than the other in a jury trial. Which one, and why?

d. The court system relies on the belief that the value of is made very small by requiring a unanimous vote before guilt is concluded. Explain why this is so.

e. For a jury prejudiced against a guilty verdict as the trial begins, will the value of increase or decrease? Explain.

f. For a jury prejudiced against a guilty verdict as the trial begins, will the value of increase or decrease? Explain

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Type 1 error occurs when a jury finds a defendant guilty of murder despite the fact that the defendant is innocent in murder trial. Type 2 error occurs if the accused is found guilty of murder but is mistakenly deemed not guilty of in the murder trial.

b. Type 1 error is more serious.

c. The type 1 error is assumed to be smaller than type 2 error in the jury trial.

d. The is minimized because a jury member may each have their own level of error.

e. The will decrease.

Step by step solution

01

Type 1 error and Type 2 error

a. *Type 1 error

It implies rejecting the null hypothesis, when actually it is true

Type 1 error occurs when a jury finds a defendant guilty of murder despite the fact that the defendant is innocent in the murder trial.

*Type 2 error

It implies accepting the null hypothesis, when actually it is false.

Type 2 error occurs if the accused is found guilty of murder but is mistakenly deemed not guilty in the murder trial.

02

Finding which of the two errors is the more serious

b. Type 1 error is more serious as the defendant is found guilty of murder when, in fact they are not.

03

Finding which of the probabilities is smaller than the other in the jury trial

c.Let be the type 1 error.

Let be the type 2 error.

We try to minimize the type 1 error as the jury is unanimous in favor of guilt.

Therefore, the type 1 error is assumed to be smaller than type 2 error in a jury trial.

04

Explaining part d. of the question

d. The value of is minimized because jury members each have their own level of error in their ability to differentiate between the guilt and innocence of the accused. Hence the minimum error occurs.

05

Explaining part e. of the question

e. Early in the trial, if the jury is prejudiced against the guilty verdict, It is likely that the accused be not guilty of murder. The probability of him being falsely convicted will decrease. Hence, the value of will decrease.

06

Explaining part f. of the question

f. Early in the trial, the jury was biased against the guilty verdict. It is likely that the defendant is actually guilty of murder. It increases the likelihood that he will be wrongfully convicted. Hence, the value of will increase.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Point spreads of NFL games. Refer to the Chance (Fall 1998) study of point-spread errors in NFL games, Exercise 7.41 (p. 411). Recall that the difference between the actual game outcome and the point spread established by odds makers鈥攖he point-spread error鈥攚as calculated for 240 NFL games. The results are summarized as follows: . Suppose the researcher wants to know whether the true standard deviation of the point spread errors exceeds 15. Conduct the analysis using = 0.10.

Refer to Exercise 6.44 (p. 356), in which 50 consumers taste-tested a new snack food. Their responses (where 0 = do not like; 1 = like; 2 = indifferent) are reproduced below

  1. Test \({H_0}:p = .5\) against \({H_0}:p > .5\), where p is the proportion of customers who do not like the snack food. Use \(\alpha = 0.10\).
    1 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1

Arresting shoplifters. Shoplifting in the United States costs retailers about $35 million a day. Despite the seriousness of the problem, the National Association of shoplifting Prevention (NASP) claims that only 50% of all shoplifters are turned over to police (www.shopliftingprevention.org). A random sample of 40 U.S. retailers were questioned concerning the disposition of the most recent shoplifter they apprehended. A total of 24 were turned over to police. Do these data provide sufficient evidence to contradict the NASP?

a. Conduct a hypothesis test to answer the question of interest. Use\(\alpha = 0.05\).

b. Is the sample size large enough to use the inferential procedure of part a?

c. Find the observed significance level of the hypothesis test in part a. Interpret the value.

d. For what values \(\alpha \) would the observed significance level be sufficient to reject the null hypothesis of the test you conducted in part b?

Consider the test \({H_0}:\mu = 70\) versus \({H_a}:\mu \ne 70\) using a large sample of size n = 400. Assume\(\sigma = 20\).

a. Describe the sampling distribution of\(\bar x\).

b. Find the value of the test statistic if\(\bar x = 72.5\).

c. Refer to part b. Find the p-value of the test.

d. Find the rejection region of the test for\(\alpha = 0.01\).

e. Refer to parts c and d. Use the p-value approach to

make the appropriate conclusion.

f. Repeat part e, but use the rejection region approach.

g. Do the conclusions, parts e and f, agree?

If a hypothesis test were conducted using = 0.05, for which of the following p-values would the null hypothesis be rejected?

a. .06

b. .10

c. .01

d. .001

e. .251

f. .042

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.