/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 838 The marketing research firm of B... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The marketing research firm of Burrows. Heller and Larimer wants to estimate the proportions of men and women who are familiar with a shoe polish. In a sample (random) of 100 men and 200 women it is found that 20 men and 60 women had used this particular shoe polish. Compute a \(95 \%\) confidence Interval for the difference in proportions between men and women familiar with the product. Use this to test the hypothesis that the proportions are equal.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Our 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions between men and women familiar with the shoe polish is approximately (-0.1009, 0.0009). Since this interval contains 0, we cannot reject the null hypothesis and therefore, there is no significant evidence to suggest that the proportions of men and women familiar with the shoe polish are different.

Step by step solution

01

Compute the sample proportions

First, let's calculate the sample proportions for men and women. We use the formula: \( p_{men} = \frac{number\ of\ men\ who\ used\ the\ shoe\ polish}{total\ number\ of\ men\ in\ the\ sample} \) \( p_{women} = \frac{number\ of\ women\ who\ used\ the\ shoe\ polish}{total\ number\ of\ women\ in\ the\ sample} \) Using the given data: \( p_{men} = \frac{20}{100} = 0.2 \) \( p_{women} = \frac{60}{200} = 0.3 \)
02

Compute the standard error

Now, let's calculate the standard error of the difference in proportions using the formula: \( SE = \sqrt{ \frac{p_{men}(1- p_{men})}{n_{men}} + \frac{p_{women}(1- p_{women})}{n_{women}}} \) Substituting the values: \( SE = \sqrt{ \frac{0.2(1- 0.2)}{100} + \frac{0.3(1- 0.3)}{200}} = \sqrt{0.0016 + 0.00105} = \sqrt{0.00265} \approx 0.0515 \)
03

Calculate the confidence interval

We want to compute a 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions. This means that our critical z-score (z-value) is 1.96. The confidence interval is given by: \( CI = (p_{men} - p_{women}) \pm z \cdot SE \) Let's calculate the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval: Lower bound: \( (0.2 - 0.3) - 1.96 \cdot 0.0515 \approx -0.1009 \) Upper bound: \( (0.2 - 0.3) + 1.96 \cdot 0.0515 \approx 0.0009 \) So, the 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions between men and women is approximately (-0.1009, 0.0009).
04

Test the hypothesis

Lastly, we need to test the hypothesis that the proportions of men and women familiar with the shoe polish are equal. That is: H0: \( p_{men} - p_{women} = 0 \) Ha: \( p_{men} - p_{women} \neq 0 \) Since the confidence interval (-0.1009, 0.0009) contains 0, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. Thus, we conclude that there's no significant evidence to suggest that the proportions of men and women familiar with the shoe polish are different.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Difference in Proportions
When comparing two groups, such as men and women in this exercise, we often look at the difference in proportions to see if the use varies significantly between them. Here, we're evaluating how many from each group are familiar with a shoe polish. This is calculated as the difference between the sample proportions of men and women.

The formula for the difference in proportions is:
  • For men: \( p_{men} = \frac{20}{100} = 0.2 \)
  • For women: \( p_{women} = \frac{60}{200} = 0.3 \)
Thus, the difference \((p_{men} - p_{women})\) is \(0.2 - 0.3 = -0.1\). This means that a smaller proportion of men are familiar with the shoe polish compared to women.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing helps determine whether there is enough statistical evidence in a sample to infer that a certain condition holds for the entire population. In our example, we want to test if the difference in proportions is significantly different from zero.

Here's how we set it up:
  • Null Hypothesis \( (H_0) \): The proportions are equal, \( p_{men} - p_{women} = 0 \).
  • Alternative Hypothesis \( (H_a) \): The proportions are not equal, \( p_{men} - p_{women} eq 0 \).
We use the confidence interval to decide whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis. If the interval includes 0, as in our case (-0.1009, 0.0009), we don't have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This suggests that there is no significant difference in the familiarity with the product between the two groups.
Standard Error
Standard Error (SE) measures the variation of a sample statistic. It tells us how much the proportion we compute from the sample is likely to vary from the true proportion in the population.

To compute SE for the difference in proportions, we use the following formula:
  • \( SE = \sqrt{ \frac{p_{men}(1- p_{men})}{n_{men}} + \frac{p_{women}(1- p_{women})}{n_{women}}} \)
Plugging in our values, we calculate it as approximately 0.0515.

This SE helps us build a confidence interval around the sample proportion difference. If this interval is wide, it indicates more variability and less certainty in our estimate.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose \(\mathrm{Q}\) is a measure of output, \(\mathrm{K}\) is a measure of capital stock in use, and \(L\) is a measure of the size of the employed labor force. Then $$ \mathrm{Q}=\mathrm{AK}^{\beta} \mathrm{L}^{\gamma} $$ is a much used form of production function. When \(\beta+\gamma=1\), it is known as a Cobb-Douglas production function. This function has many convenient properties: Marginal products of both labor and capital are positive if \(\beta\) and \(\gamma\) are. If \(\beta+\gamma=1\), the function has constant returns to scale. That is, if both inputs are increased in like proportion, output will increase in that same proportion. A doubling of both inputs, for example, will result in doubled output. Discuss how the concept of linear regression might be applied to estimate \(\beta\) and \(\gamma\).

A contractor has found through experience that the low bid for a job (excluding his own bid) is a random variable that is uniformly distributed over the interval \((3 \mathrm{c} / 4,2 \mathrm{c})\) where \(\mathrm{c}\) is the contractor's cost estimate (no profit or loss) of the job. If profit is defined as zero if the contractor does not get the job (his bid is greater than the low bid) and as the difference between his bid and the cost estimate \(\mathrm{c}\) if he gets the job, what should he bid, in terms of \(\mathrm{c}\), in order to maximize his expected profit?

You are the president of a company that makes wrist watches. The prestige line of watches, Chronomatrix 1536 is waterproof, shockproof, dustproof and features anti-magnetic movement. This watch is sold to distributors for \(\$ 25\) apiece. Your vice-president suggests that a guarantee to replace watches that fail within two years of purchase would allow a price increase of \(\$ 2.00\) per watch without a decrease in demand. The engineering department assures you that the lifetimes of the Chronomatrix 1536 follow some unknown probability distribution with mean \(\mu=3.5\) years and \(\sigma=0.5\) years. If sales remain constant at 100,000 watches per year and a replacement watch would cost \(\$ 15.00\), is this a profitable policy for your company?

Plot the following two time series on the same graph and compare. $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|} \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Coal production } \\ \text { Tons (millions) } \end{array} & \text { Year } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Wage earners in industry Number } \\ \text { (thousands) } \end{array} \\ \hline 210.8 & 1952 & 706.2 \\ \hline 211.5 & 1954 & 701.8 \\ \hline 207.4 & 1956 & 697.4 \\ \hline 198.8 & 1958 & 692.7 \\ \hline 183.9 & 1960 & 602.1 \\ \hline 176.8 & 1962 & 531.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The Kannan Manufacturing Company is going to build a new plant. Kannan can either build a large plant or a small one with the option of expanding the small one if feasible. Kannan is uncertain of the demand for his product, but he does know that it will be high with a probability of \(0.6\) and low with a probability of \(0.4 .\) For a large plant and high demand net profit is \(\$ 6\) million; and if the demand is low, the payoff is \(\$ 1\) million. Similarly, if a small plant is built initially and no expansion is made the net profits are \(\$ 4\) million (high demand) and \(\$ 3\) million (low demand). There is a net profit of \(\$ 5\) million with expansion of a small plant in the face of high demand. This is determined as follows: Profit from high demand (with production ability to meet demand). \(\$ 10\) million Less: Cost of building small plant \(\$ 2\) million Cost of expanding 3 million Total cost 5 million Payoff \(\$ 5\) million Similarly, expanding in the face of low demand costs the \(\$ 5\) million as above and only has a profit of \(\$ 5\) million. The net profit is zero. Should Kannan build a large or a small plant?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.