/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 796 When Joe got back from Bolivia, ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

When Joe got back from Bolivia, the first thing he did was to test the 'magic powder' that the natives there had claimed would prevent materials from shrinking when they were being laundered. He got 9 different sorts of cloth, cut them into strips, measured them, laundered them with the 'magic powder', and then measured them again. He did this twice with each type of cloth, and then repeated the whole process (using fresh cloths, of course) without the "magic powder', to serve as his controls. Here are the results; is there a statistically significant difference between them?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In order to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between the results obtained with and without the "magic powder", a paired t-test was performed. The calculated t-value was compared to the critical t-value, and if the calculated t-value is greater than or equal to the critical t-value, the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the means can be rejected, indicating that the "magic powder" has a significant effect on preventing shrinkage. If the calculated t-value is less than the critical t-value, there is no evidence to support the claim that the "magic powder" prevents shrinkage.

Step by step solution

01

Organize the Data

Create a table with three columns: Type of Cloth, With Powder, and Without Powder. List the shrinkage measurements for each type of cloth in their respective columns. Calculate the differences between each pair (with powder - without powder) and list them in a fourth column called "Differences".
02

Calculate the mean and standard deviation of the differences

Calculate the mean (\(\bar{D}\)) and standard deviation (SD) of the differences. Use the formula for the mean: \[\bar{D} = \frac{\sum D}{n}\] where \(n\) is the sample size (9 in this case), and \(D\) is the difference between shrinkage with and without the powder for each cloth type. The formula for standard deviation is: \[SD = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (D-\bar{D})^2}{n-1}}\]
03

Perform a paired t-test

We will use a paired t-test to determine if there is a significant difference between shrinkage with and without the powder. The test statistic for the paired t-test is: \[t = \frac{\bar{D}}{SD / \sqrt{n}}\] Calculate the t-value using the mean and standard deviation obtained in the previous step.
04

Determine the critical t-value and degrees of freedom

Using the appropriate t-distribution table, determine the critical t-value associated with the given level of significance (typically 0.05) and the degrees of freedom (df), which is equal to the sample size minus 1 (9-1 = 8).
05

Compare the test statistic and critical t-value

Compare the calculated t-value (from Step 3) to the critical t-value (from Step 4). If the calculated t-value is greater than or equal to the critical t-value, you can reject the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the means. In this case, you could conclude that the "magic powder" has a significant effect on preventing shrinkage. If the calculated t-value is less than the critical t-value, you cannot reject the null hypothesis, and there is no evidence to support the claim that the "magic powder" prevents shrinkage.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental concept in statistics. It helps us determine whether a certain statement about a population parameter is likely to be true. In Joe's experiment with the "magic powder," hypothesis testing is used to decide if the powder genuinely prevents shrinkage in the cloths, or if any differences observed are simply due to chance.

To begin hypothesis testing, we establish two hypotheses:
  • Null Hypothesis (H鈧): Assumes that there is no effect or difference. In this context, it suggests that the magic powder does not prevent shrinkage.
  • Alternative Hypothesis (H鈧): Assumes that there is a significant effect or difference. Here, it claims that the magic powder does reduce the shrinkage of the cloths.

Once these hypotheses are set, the next step is to gather data, in this case, shrinkage measurements with and without the powder. A statistical test, like the paired t-test, is performed to determine the likelihood that the null hypothesis is true. If the results show the null hypothesis is unlikely, it may be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Mean Difference
The mean difference is a key concept in determining if there is an effect or change across samples. In Joe's study, each piece of cloth's shrinkage is measured with and without the magic powder. By calculating the mean difference, Joe can see the average effect of the powder.

To find the mean difference, we subtract the shrinkage without powder from the shrinkage with the powder for each cloth type. The arithmetic mean (\(ar{D}\)) of these differences provides a simplified view of the magic powder's effectiveness.

This calculation is important because it aggregates individual data points into a single number that captures the essence of the experiment's outcome. A non-zero mean difference indicates that on average, the powder might affect the shrinkage, while a mean difference close to zero suggests that the powder has no significant impact.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation measures the amount of variability or spread in a set of data values. In Joe's experiment, the standard deviation of the differences shows how much these differences deviate from the mean difference.

A high standard deviation implies that there is a lot of variation in the differences between shrinkage with and without the powder, possibly making it hard to assess the powder's true effect. Conversely, a low standard deviation indicates that the differences are consistently close to the mean difference, suggesting a more reliable result.

To calculate standard deviation for the differences (\(SD\)), you use the formula:\[SD = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (D-\bar{D})^2}{n-1}}\]where \(D\)is each difference and\(n\)is the sample size. Understanding standard deviation is crucial as it affects the reliability of the test results and helps interpret the experiment's outcome more accurately.
Critical t-value
In hypothesis testing, the critical t-value helps us determine the threshold at which we would reject the null hypothesis. It is derived from the t-distribution, which is applicable when dealing with small sample sizes or population standard deviations that are unknown.

The critical t-value is influenced by two factors:
  • The desired level of significance (commonly set at 0.05), which represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.
  • The degrees of freedom, calculated as the sample size minus one (in Joe's case, 8 because he used 9 pieces of cloth).
By comparing the calculated t-value to the critical t-value, you decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. If the calculated t-value exceeds the critical t-value, it means that the observed results are unlikely under the null hypothesis, suggesting that the "magic powder" might indeed have an effect. This step is the final adjudicator in hypothesis testing, offering insight into the statistical significance of the experiment's results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

It is very inconvenient, to say the least, when sailors get seasick, so Captain McIntosh thought he should try out the latest remedy, 'Sicko' pills. He bought 200 pills (1 for each member of his crew), and 200 others that looked exactly the same but which were made of pure lactose (milk sugar). He would use the latter as a control, for he knew that they had no specific effect on seasickness. He put all the pills in his medicine cupboard, and waited for a storm. During the first storm, Captain McIntosh did nothing except note the names of the 30 men (out of 200 , remember) who became seasick. At the first warning of the next storm, he got each and every man aboard to swallow a lactose pill (he didn't tell anyone what they were or what they were for), and again he noted the names of those who became sick. Finally, when the next storm approached, he gave each man a 'Sicko' pill, and again noted the results. All 3 storms being similar in severity and duration, he felt it was quite fair to compare the results of each storm with each other. So he sorted out the results and found - 15 men were sick only when they took no pill. 3 other men were sick only when they took a 'Sicko' pill. 1 other man was sick only when he took a lactose pill. 8 other men were sick both when they took no pill, and when they took a lactose pill. 4 other men were sick both when they took no pill, and when they took a 'Sicko' pill. 3 other men were sick both when they took a lactose pill, and when they took a 'Sicko' pill. 3 other men were sick on all 3 occasions. Can you tell - a) Was there a significant difference between the numbers of men seasick during the 3 storms? b) How could this investigation have been planned so that it would have remained valid if the storms had proved unequal in severity?

Random samples of 2 brands of almond candy bars were examined to see if one brand contained more almonds than the other. Altogether 18 bars of brand \(\mathrm{A}\) and 22 of brand \(\mathrm{B}\) were tested. The rank total of brand \(A, T_{x}\), turned out to be 274 . Does this indicate a \(5 \%\) statistically significant difference between the two brands.

To compare the effectiveness of three types of pain relievers, a homogeneous group of 22 secretaries was divided into three subgroups, and each subgroup took one of these pain relievers for a period of 2 weeks. The average duration of the headaches, in minutes, during these two weeks were as follows: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline Brand A & Brand B & Brand C \\ \hline \(5.3\) & \(6.3\) & \(2.4\) \\ \hline \(4.2\) & \(8.4\) & \(3.1\) \\ \hline \(3.7\) & \(9.3\) & \(3.7\) \\ \hline \(7.2\) & \(6.5\) & \(4.1\) \\ \hline \(6.0\) & \(7.7\) & \(2.5\) \\ \hline \(4.8\) & \(8.2\) & \(1.7\) \\ \hline & \(9.5\) & \(5.3\) \\ \hline & & \(4.5\) \\ \hline & & \(1.3\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Use the Kruskal-Wallis Test to test the null hypothesis that the effectiveness of the three brands is the same, against the alternative hypothesis that their effectiveness is not the same. Use a level of significance of \(0.01\).

Nine economy cars were priced at \(\$ 4,330 ; \$ 4,287 ; \$ 4,450\); \(\$ 4,295 ; \$ 4,340 ; \$ 4,407 ; \$ 4,295 ; \$ 4,388 ;\) and \(\$ 4,356 . \mathrm{We}\) wish to estimate with probability \(.99\), limits within which \(90 \%\) of the economy car prices are.

Let \(\mathrm{X}_{1}, \mathrm{X}_{2}, \ldots . \mathrm{X}_{10}\) be a random sample of size 10 from a distribution function \(\mathrm{F}(\mathrm{x}) .\) We wish to test the hypothesis, \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: \mathrm{F}(72)=(1 / 2)\) against the alternative hypothesis \(\mathrm{H}_{1}: \mathrm{F}(72)>(1 / 2) .\) Let \(\mathrm{Y}\) be the number of sample items which are less than or equal to \(72 .\) Let the observed value of \(\mathrm{Y}\) be \(\mathrm{y}\), and let the test be defined by the critical region \(\\{\mathrm{y}: \mathrm{y} \geq 8\\} .\) Find the power function of this test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.