/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 773 Compute and interpret \(\mathrm{... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Compute and interpret \(\mathrm{C}\) for the data compiled relating the drop-out rate among volunteers to participation in a workshop group. The contingency table was \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline & Remained in Program & Dropped Out & \\ \hline Workshop & 18 & 9 & 27 \\ \hline No workshop & 10 & 13 & 23 \\ \hline & 28 & 22 & \\ \hline \end{tabular}

Short Answer

Expert verified
The contingency coefficient (C) for the given data is approximately 0.23, which suggests a weak association between participation in a workshop group and the drop-out rate among volunteers. This means that attending the workshop has a minimal influence on whether a volunteer remains in the program or not.

Step by step solution

01

Compute Expected Frequencies

Compute the expected frequencies for each cell in the contingency table using the following formula: Expected Frequency = (Row Total * Column Total) / Grand Total For example, for the "Workshop" and "Remained in Program" cell: Expected Frequency = (27 * 28) / 50 Now, compute the expected frequencies for all cells: \(\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline & Remained in Program & Dropped Out & \\\ \hline Workshop & 15.12(18) & 11.88(9) & 27 \\\ \hline No workshop & 12.88(10) & 10.12(13) & 23 \\\ \hline & 28 & 22 & \\\ \hline \end{tabular}\)
02

Calculate Chi-Square Statistic (χ²)

Calculate the χ² value using the following formula: χ² = Σ [ (Observed Frequency - Expected Frequency)² / Expected Frequency ] For example, for the "Workshop" and "Remained in Program" cell: (Observed Frequency - Expected Frequency)² / Expected Frequency = (18 - 15.12)² / 15.12 Now, compute the χ² value for all cells and sum them up: χ² = (18 - 15.12)² / 15.12 + (9 - 11.88)² / 11.88 + (10 - 12.88)² / 12.88 + (13 - 10.12)² / 10.12 = 0.57 + 0.73 + 0.65 + 0.81 = 2.76
03

Compute the Contingency Coefficient (C)

Compute the contingency coefficient (C) using the following formula: C = √( χ² / (χ² + Grand Total) ) C = √( 2.76 / (2.76 + 50) ) C ≈ 0.23
04

Interpret the Contingency Coefficient

The contingency coefficient (C) ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates no association and 1 indicates a strong association. In this case, C ≈ 0.23, which suggests a weak association between participation in a workshop group and the drop-out rate among volunteers. This means that attending the workshop has a minimal influence on whether a volunteer remains in the program or not.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Contingency Table
A contingency table is a type of table in statistics that displays the frequency distribution of variables. It helps to analyze the relationship between two categorical variables. In the original exercise, the contingency table shows the number of volunteers who remained or dropped out of a program based on their participation in a workshop.
The structure of the table includes rows and columns where:
  • Rows represent different categories of one variable, such as 'Workshop' and 'No Workshop'.
  • Columns represent the outcomes, like 'Remained in Program' and 'Dropped Out'.
  • Each cell in the table indicates a frequency count.
The table summarizes the data in an easy-to-understand manner and serves as a foundation for conducting further statistical analysis, like the chi-square test.
Chi-Square Test
The chi-square test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant association between two categorical variables. It compares the observed frequencies in a contingency table against the expected frequencies if there is no association between the variables.
To perform a chi-square test, we calculate the chi-square statistic (χ²) using the formula:
  • χ² = Σ [(Observed Frequency - Expected Frequency)² / Expected Frequency]
Each term in the sum corresponds to a different cell in the contingency table. A larger χ² value indicates a greater discrepancy between observed and expected frequencies, suggesting a possible association.
The calculated χ² value is then compared to a critical value from the chi-square distribution to determine if the association is statistically significant.
Expected Frequency
Expected frequency is a key concept in contingency tables and chi-square tests. It refers to the frequency count you would expect in each cell of the table if there were no association between the variables.
To calculate the expected frequency for each cell, use the formula:
  • Expected Frequency = (Row Total * Column Total) / Grand Total
For example, in the exercise, the expected frequency for the cell representing volunteers who attended workshops and remained in the program is calculated. The formula combines the totals from relevant rows and columns to provide a baseline for comparison.
The process of finding expected frequencies is crucial for quantifying differences between what is observed and what would occur by chance.
Statistical Association
Statistical association refers to the relationship between two variables, indicating how the presence or absence of one variable relates to the other. In the context of the contingency table, statistical association assesses if there is a relationship between workshop participation and drop-out rates.
One measure of association is the contingency coefficient (C), which is computed after conducting a chi-square test. The value of C ranges from 0 to 1:
  • C = 0 implies no association.
  • C = 1 implies a perfect association.
  • Values between 0 and 1 denote varying levels of association.
In the exercise, the calculated C value of approximately 0.23 suggests a weak statistical association, meaning participation in the workshop has a minimal impact on whether volunteers remain in or drop out of the program.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose we wish to test whether a new drug aids the recovery of patients suffering from a mental illness when it is known that some patients recover spontaneously without any treatment at all. Starting with \(\mathrm{m}+\mathrm{n}\) patients, we create two groups. One group of \(\mathrm{m}\) patients gets no treatment and thus acts as a control group for the treatment group, which contains n patients. At the end of the experiment, the numbers of patients who recovered are \(j\) and \(k\). If in fact that drug has no effect, then it is as if there were \(j+k\) among the \(n+m\) who were bound to recover anyway. Find the probability that \(\mathrm{k}\) recover in the treatment group only by virtue of drawing a random sample of n from \(\mathrm{n}+\mathrm{m}\).

One hundred observations were drawn from each of two Poisson populations with the following results: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 or more & Total \\ \hline Population 1 & 11 & 25 & 28 & 20 & 9 & 3 & 3 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 100 \\ \hline Population 2 & 13 & 27 & 28 & 17 & 11 & 1 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\ \hline Total & 24 & 52 & 56 & 37 & 20 & 11 & & & & & 200 \\ \hline \end{tabular} Is there strong evidence in the data to support the assertion that the two Poisson populations are the same?

Experience in a certain apple-growing region indicates that about 20 per cent of the total apple crop is classified in the best grade, about 40 per cent in the next highest rating, about 30 per cent in the next highest rating, and the remaining 10 per cent in the fourth and lowest rating. A random sample of 50 trees in a certain orchard yielded 600 bushels of apples, classified as follows: 150 bushels of the highest quality apples 290 bushels of the next highest, 140 bushels of the next highest, and 20 bushels of the lowest quality apples Can we conclude that the applet in this orchard are typical?

To find out whether there is a significant association between the sensitivity of the skin to sunlight and the color of a person's eyes, we could take a random sample of, say, 100 people, and test them all with a standard dose of ultra violet rays, noting both their reaction to this test and their eye color. Both of these features are noted for each person in the trial, so the observations are matched. The results could then be tabulated in an association table like this \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \multicolumn{2}{|l|} {} & \multicolumn{3}{|c|} { Ultra-violet reaction } & \multirow{2}{*} {\(\mathrm{R}\)} \\ \cline { 3 - 5 } \multicolumn{2}{|l|} {} & \(++\) & \(+\) & \(-\) & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*} { Eye Color } & Blue & 19 & 27 & 4 & 50 \\ \cline { 2 - 6 } & Grey or green & 7 & 8 & 5 & 20 \\ \cline { 2 - 6 } & Brown & 1 & 13 & 16 & 30 \\ \hline C & & 27 & 48 & 25 & \(100=\mathrm{N}\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Is this relationship significant? What are some measures of association which describe the strength of association? How strongly associated are these variables?

What is the relationship between the \(\mathrm{X}^{2}\) statistic and sample size given that everything else remains constant?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.