/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 743 Let the result of a random exper... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let the result of a random experiment be classified by two attributes. Let these two attributes be eye color and hair color. One attribute of the outcome, eye color, can be divided into certain mutually exclusive and exhaustive events. Let these events be: \(\mathrm{A}_{1}:\) Blue eyes \(\mathrm{A}_{2}:\) Brown eyes \(\mathrm{A}_{3}:\) Grey eyes \(\mathrm{A}_{4}:\) Black eyes \(\quad \mathrm{A}_{5}:\) Green eyes The other attribute of the outcome can also be divided into certain mutually exclusive and exhaustive events. Let these events be: \(\mathrm{B}_{1}:\) Blond hair \(\mathrm{B}_{2}:\) Brown hair \(\quad \mathrm{B}_{3}:\) Black hair \(\mathrm{B}_{4}:\) Red hair. The experiment is performed by observing \(\mathrm{n}=500\) people and each of them are categorized according to eye color and hair color. Let \(\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{i}} \cap \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{j}}\) be the event that a person with eye color \(\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{i}}\) and hair color \(\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{i}}\) is observed, \(\mathrm{i}=1,2,3,4,5\) and \(j=1,2,3,4\). Let \(X_{i j}\) be the observed frequency of event \(\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{i}} \cap \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{j}}\). Test the hypothesis that \(\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{i}}\) and \(\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{j}}\) are independent attributes.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To test the hypothesis that eye color and hair color are independent attributes, perform a chi-squared test of independence using a contingency table. Calculate row and column totals, expected frequencies, and the chi-squared test statistic. Determine the degrees of freedom and find the critical value from a chi-squared distribution table. Compare the test statistic to the critical value. If the test statistic is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Create a Contingency Table

First, we must create a contingency table to summarize the observed frequencies of the combined events \(A_i \cap B_j\). This table will have five rows (one for each eye color event) and four columns (one for each hair color event).
02

Calculate Row and Column Totals

Next, calculate the row and column totals for the contingency table. This will involve summing the observed frequencies for each eye color event in each row and for each hair color event in each column.
03

Calculate Expected Frequencies

Now, calculate the expected frequency for each cell in the contingency table. The expected frequency for a cell \((i, j)\) is given by the formula: \( E_{ij} = \frac{(row \thinspace total_{i}) \times (col \thinspace total_{j})}{n} \), where \(n\) is the total number of observations (500 in our case).
04

Compute the Chi-Squared Test Statistic

Next, compute the chi-squared test statistic, denoted by \( \chi^2 \), using the following formula: \( \chi^2 = \sum_{i=1}^5 \sum_{j=1}^4 \frac{(O_{ij} - E_{ij})^2}{E_{ij}} \), where \( O_{ij} \) are the observed frequencies and \( E_{ij} \) are the expected frequencies.
05

Determine the Degrees of Freedom

In order to compare our test statistic against a critical value, we need to determine the degrees of freedom. This is given by the formula: \( df = (number \thinspace of \thinspace rows - 1) \times (number \thinspace of \thinspace columns - 1) \), In our case, this gives us \(df = (5-1) \times (4-1) = 12\).
06

Find the Critical Value

Using a chi-squared distribution table, find the critical value for our calculated degrees of freedom (12) and a chosen significance level (e.g., 0.05).
07

Comparing the Test Statistic to the Critical Value

Compare the chi-squared test statistic to the critical value found in Step 6. If the test statistic is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis that the eye color and hair color are independent attributes. Otherwise, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. In conclusion, by following these steps and applying the chi-squared test of independence with the given data, we can determine whether eye color and hair color are independent attributes in the observed population.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Contingency Table
A contingency table is a simple and organized way to present data that shows the frequency distribution of variables. In this case, the table categorizes individuals based on two attributes: eye color and hair color.

The table is structured with rows and columns. Each row represents a distinct category of eye color, and each column represents a category of hair color. This organization helps to visualize how the different categories interact with each other.

For the given problem, the contingency table consists of five rows and four columns. That's because there are five types of eye colors and four types of hair colors. By summarizing the data in this way, it becomes easier to see patterns or relationships between the attributes.

Most importantly, the contingency table is crucial for the next steps in the chi-squared test, as it helps compute both observed and expected frequencies.
Expected Frequency
Expected frequency helps us understand what we would anticipate if there were no association between categories. To compute the expected frequency for each cell in the contingency table, we use the formula: \[ E_{ij} = \frac{(\text{row total}_i) \times (\text{column total}_j)}{n} \] where \(E_{ij}\) represents the expected frequency of the cell at row \(i\) and column \(j\), and \(n\) is the total number of observations (500 in this case).

Calculating this value involves:
  • Multiplying the total number of occurrences in a specific row by the total number of occurrences in a specific column.
  • Dividing that product by the overall number of cases (total sample size).
These expected frequencies assume that the two attributes are independent. By comparing them to the observed frequencies, the chi-squared test determines whether the discrepancies are due to chance or indicate a possible relationship between the variables.
Degrees of Freedom
The degrees of freedom in a statistical test, like the chi-squared test, help indicate how many independent values or quantities can vary in the analysis. For a contingency table, the degrees of freedom are calculated using the formula:\[ df = (\text{number of rows} - 1) \times (\text{number of columns} - 1) \]In our example, we have a 5x4 table, leading to a calculation of:\[ df = (5-1) \times (4-1) = 12 \]

These degrees of freedom allow us to find the critical value in the chi-squared distribution table. This critical value serves as a threshold to decide whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis. More degrees of freedom typically mean more complex models, as they represent more categories and potential variability in the dataset.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Monsieur Alphonse is director of Continental Mannequin Academy. He is desirous of a raise in salary, so is telling his Board of Management how his results are better than those of their competitor, Mrs. Batty's Establishment for Young Models. 'At the Institute's last examinations, 'he goes on, 'we got 10 honours, 45 passes, and 5 failures, whereas \(\mathrm{Mrs}\). Batty's Establishment only got 4 honours, 35 passes, and had 11 failures.' Do his figures prove his point, or might they be reasonably ascribed to chance? \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|c|} { Exam results } & Row \\ \cline { 2 - 4 } & Honours & Passes & Failures & Totals \\ \hline Alphonse & 10 & 45 & 5 & 60 \\ Batty & 4 & 35 & 11 & 50 \\ \hline Column Totals & 14 & 80 & 16 & \(110=\mathrm{N}\) \\ \hline \end{tabular}

One hundred observations were drawn from each of two Poisson populations with the following results: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 or more & Total \\ \hline Population 1 & 11 & 25 & 28 & 20 & 9 & 3 & 3 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 100 \\ \hline Population 2 & 13 & 27 & 28 & 17 & 11 & 1 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\ \hline Total & 24 & 52 & 56 & 37 & 20 & 11 & & & & & 200 \\ \hline \end{tabular} Is there strong evidence in the data to support the assertion that the two Poisson populations are the same?

Of 12 sampled workers who are 50 years of age or over, had an industrial accident last year and 10 did not. Of 18 sampled workers under 50 years of age, 8 had industrial accidents. Construct a contingency table to represent these findings.

Suppose that a sales region has been divided into five territories, each of which was judged to have an equal sales potential. The actual sales volume for several sampled days is indicated below. \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \multicolumn{5}{|c|} { T e r r i t o r y } \\ \hline & A & B & C & D & E \\ \hline Actual Sales & 110 & 130 & 70 & 90 & 100 \\ \hline \end{tabular} What are the expected sales for each area? How many degrees of freedom does the chi-square statistic have? Compute \(\mathrm{X}^{2}\) and use the table of \(\mathrm{X}^{2}\) values to test the significance of the difference between the observed and expected levels of sales.

Often frequency data are tabulated according to two criteria, with a view toward testing whether the criteria are associated. Consider the following analysis of the 157 machine breakdowns during a given quarter. \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \multicolumn{3}{|l|} { Number of Breakdowns } \\ \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|l|} { Machine } & \\ \hline & A & B & C & D & Total per Shift \\ \hline Shift 1 & 10 & 6 & 13 & 13 & 41 \\ \hline Shift 2 & 10 & 12 & 19 & 21 & 62 \\ \hline Shift 3 & 13 & 10 & 13 & 18 & 54 \\ \hline Total per machine & 33 & 28 & 44 & 52 & 157 \\ \hline \end{tabular} We are interested in whether the same percentage of breakdown occurs on each machine during each shift or whether there is some difference due perhaps to untrained operators or other factors peculiar to a given shift.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.