/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Let \(R_{1}, \ldots, R_{n}\) be ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(R_{1}, \ldots, R_{n}\) be a binomial random sample with parameters \(m\) and \(0<\pi<1\), where \(m\) is known. Find a complete minimal sufficient statistic for \(\pi\) and hence find the minimum variance unbiased estimator of \(\pi(1-\pi)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The complete minimal sufficient statistic is \( T = \sum_{i=1}^{n} R_i \), and the MVUE for \( \pi(1-\pi) \) is \( \hat{\pi}(1-\hat{\pi}) = \frac{T}{nm} \left( 1 - \frac{T}{nm} \right) \).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Binomial Random Sample

A binomial random sample consists of observations that are independently and identically distributed, each following a binomial distribution with parameters (m, \( \pi \)). This means each \( R_{i} \) represents the number of successes in \( m \) Bernoulli trials with the probability of success being \( \pi \).
02

Determine the Joint Probability Mass Function

The joint probability mass function (PMF) for the random sample \( R_1, R_2, \ldots, R_n \) can be expressed as the product of individual PMFs: \[ P(R_{1}, \, R_{2}, \, \ldots, \, R_{n} \, | \, \pi) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} \binom{m}{R_i} \pi^{R_i} (1-\pi)^{m-R_i} \].
03

Sufficiency of the Statistic

According to the factorization theorem, a statistic is sufficient for a parameter if the joint PMF can be factored into a product of two functions, one of which depends solely on the sample and the parameter. The joint PMF can be rewritten, factoring out the \( \pi \)-dependent part: \[ \prod_{i=1}^{n} \binom{m}{R_i} \cdot \pi^{\sum_{i=1}^{n} R_i} (1-\pi)^{nm-\sum_{i=1}^{n} R_i} \]. Thus, the statistic \( T = \sum_{i=1}^{n} R_i \) is sufficient for \( \pi \).
04

Completeness of the Sufficient Statistic

A statistic is complete if no non-zero function of it has an expectation of zero for all \( \pi \). Since \( T = \sum_{i=1}^{n} R_i \) follows a Binomial distribution with parameters \( mn \) and \( \pi \), it is both a complete and a sufficient statistic for \( \pi \) because the binomial distribution satisfies the completeness property due to its exponential family form.
05

Finding the Unbiased Estimator for \(\pi(1-\pi)\)

To find the minimum variance unbiased estimator (MVUE) for \( \pi (1-\pi) \), find an unbiased estimator based on the complete sufficient statistic. Since the expectation \( E(T) = nm\pi \), it follows \( \hat{\pi} = \frac{T}{nm} \) is an unbiased estimator for \( \pi \). Then, \( \hat{\pi}(1-\hat{\pi}) = \frac{T}{nm} \left( 1 - \frac{T}{nm} \right) \) is the MVUE for \( \pi(1-\pi) \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Binomial Distribution
The binomial distribution is a foundational concept in statistics that models the number of successes in a fixed number of independent binary experiments or trials — each with the same probability of success. In the context of our exercise, you have a series of binomial samples, each characterized by parameters: the number of trials \( m \) and the probability of success \( \pi \).
This distribution is widely used to answer questions pertaining to binary outcomes, such as flipping a coin or checking whether a light bulb is defective.
  • Each trial is independent, meaning the outcome of one trial does not affect another.
  • The probability \( \pi \) remains constant throughout all trials.
Understanding the binomial distribution is crucial, as it provides the basis for identifying complete and sufficient statistics for parameter estimation. Here, the sum \( T = \sum R_i \) of binomial random variables is key to drawing inferences about the underlying probability \( \pi \).
Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimator
The concept of a Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimator (MVUE) revolves around finding an estimator that not only provides unbiased predictions of the true parameter value but also exhibits the smallest possible variance among all unbiased estimators.
It's an essential principle in statistical estimation, ensuring that our estimates are as close to the actual parameter as possible while maintaining reliability.
For our problem, the task was to find an MVUE for \( \pi(1-\pi) \). Starting with the unbiased estimator for \( \pi \), \( \hat{\pi} = \frac{T}{nm} \), the MVUE of \( \pi(1-\pi) \) is then \( \hat{\pi}(1-\hat{\pi}) = \frac{T}{nm} \left( 1 - \frac{T}{nm} \right) \).This form ensures that we're balancing precision with variability in our estimation approach, all derived from the complete sufficient statistic found earlier.
Factorization Theorem
The Factorization Theorem provides a powerful method to determine whether a statistic is sufficient.
It states that if you can factor the joint probability mass function (PMF) or probability density function (PDF) of a sample into two parts — one dependent only on the sample and another on the parameter of interest — then you have found a sufficient statistic.
In the exercise, the joint PMF was expressed as \[ P(R_{1}, \, R_{2}, \, \ldots, \, R_{n} \, | \, \pi) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} \binom{m}{R_i} \pi^{R_i} (1-\pi)^{m-R_i} \]and was factored as:\[ \prod_{i=1}^{n} \binom{m}{R_i} \cdot \pi^{\sum R_i} (1-\pi)^{nm-\sum R_i} \]showing that \( T = \sum R_i \) is indeed sufficient for \( \pi \).
By reformulating the PMF, we clearly delineate the parameter-specific section, making the underlying parameter's information captured in \( T \) sufficient for analysis.
Exponential Family
The exponential family of distributions is a broad class of probability distributions, often characterized by their simple, canonical form, which provides mathematical tractability.
Distributions that belong to this family include the normal, binomial, Poisson, and others. These distributions are particularly useful because they have nice statistical properties, such as sufficiency and completeness, which aid in statistical inference.
  • The binomial distribution, seen in our exercise, belongs to the exponential family.
  • Its parameters can be estimated using the methods derived from the properties of exponential family distributions.
Completeness, as used in the exercise, is a consequence of the binomial distribution being part of this family.
This means any unbiased estimator based on the statistic \( T = \sum R_i \) will exhibit minimal variance. Recognizing the binomial distribution as part of this broader family allows us to apply advanced theorems for efficient parameter estimation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The incidence of a rare disease seems to be increasing. In successive years the numbers of new cases have been \(y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}\). These may be assumed to be independent observations from Poisson distributions with means \(\lambda \theta, \ldots, \lambda \theta^{n}\). Show that there is a family of tests each of which, for any given value of \(\lambda\), is a uniformly most powerful test of its size for testing \(\theta=1\) against \(\theta>1\).

Let \(\bar{Y}\) be the average of a random sample from the uniform density on \((0, \theta)\). Show that \(2 \bar{Y}\) is unbiased for \(\theta\). Find a sufficient statistic for \(\theta\), and obtain an estimator based on it which has smaller variance. Compare their mean squared errors.

A source at location \(x=0\) pollutes the environment. Are cases of a rare disease \(\mathcal{D}\) later observed at positions \(x_{1}, \ldots, x_{n}\) linked to the source? Cases of another rare disease \(\mathcal{D}^{\prime}\) known to be unrelated to the pollutant but with the same susceptible population as \(\mathcal{D}\) are observed at \(x_{1}^{\prime}, \ldots, x_{m}^{\prime} .\) If the probabilities of contracting \(\mathcal{D}\) and \(\mathcal{D}^{\prime}\) are respectively \(\psi(x)\) and \(\psi^{\prime}\), and the population of susceptible individuals has density \(\lambda(x)\), show that the probability of \(\mathcal{D}\) at \(x\), given that \(\mathcal{D}\) or \(\mathcal{D}^{\prime}\) occurs there, is $$ \pi(x)=\frac{\psi(x) \lambda(x)}{\psi(x) \lambda(x)+\psi^{\prime} \lambda(x)} $$ Deduce that the probability of the observed configuration of diseased persons, conditional on their positions, is $$ \prod_{j=1}^{n} \pi\left(x_{j}\right) \prod_{i=1}^{m}\left\\{1-\pi\left(x_{i}^{\prime}\right)\right\\} $$ The null hypothesis that \(\mathcal{D}\) is unrelated to the pollutant asserts that \(\psi(x)\) is independent of \(x\). Show that in this case the unknown parameters may be eliminated by conditioning on having observed \(n\) cases of \(\mathcal{D}\) out of a total \(n+m\) cases. Deduce that the null probability of the observed pattern is \(\left({ }_{n}^{n+m}\right)^{-1}\). If \(T\) is a statistic designed to detect decline of \(\psi(x)\) with \(x\), explain how permutation of case labels \(\mathcal{D}, \mathcal{D}^{\prime}\) may be used to obtain a significance level \(p_{\text {obs }}\). Such a test is typically only conducted after a suspicious pattern of cases of \(\mathcal{D}\) has been observed. How will this influence \(p_{\text {obs }}\) ?

Let \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) be a random sample from an unknown density \(f\). Let \(I_{j}\) indicate whether or not \(Y_{j}\) lies in the interval ( \(\left.a-\frac{1}{2} h, a+\frac{1}{2} h\right]\), and consider \(R=\sum I_{j}\). Show that \(R\) has a binomial distribution with denominator \(n\) and probability $$ \int_{a-\frac{1}{2} h}^{a+\frac{1}{2} h} f(y) d y $$ Hence show that \(R /(n h)\) has approximate mean and variance \(f(a)+\frac{1}{2} h^{2} f^{\prime \prime}(a)\) and \(f(a) / n h\), where \(f^{\prime \prime}\) is the second derivative of \(f\). What implications have these results for using the histogram to estimate \(f(a)\) ?

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) represent the times of the first \(n\) events in a Poisson process of rate \(\mu^{-1}\) observed from time zero; thus \(0

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.