/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Use the factorization criterion ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the factorization criterion to show that the maximum likelihood estimate and observed information based on \(f(y ; \theta)\) are functions of data \(y\) only through a sufficient statistic \(s(y)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The MLE and observed information depend on data through the sufficient statistic \(s(y)\) by factorization.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Factorization Theorem

To show that the maximum likelihood estimate and observed information depend on sufficient statistics, we must use the factorization theorem. The factorization theorem states that a statistic \(s(y)\) is sufficient for parameter \(\theta\) if and only if the likelihood function \(f(y; \theta)\) can be factored as \(g(s(y), \theta)h(y)\), where \(g\) is a function of \(s(y)\) and \(\theta\), and \(h\) is a function of \(y\) alone. This indicates that all information about \(\theta\) is contained in \(s(y)\).
02

Expressing Likelihood in Factorized Form

Write the likelihood function \(L(\theta; y) = f(y; \theta)\) and express it in the form \(L(\theta; y) = g(s(y), \theta)h(y)\). The presence of \(h(y)\) indicates that any variability not related to \(\theta\) is absorbed, leaving \(s(y)\) as the sufficient statistic that captures all information about \(\theta\).
03

Identifying the Maximum Likelihood Estimator

By using the factorization theorem, since all information about \(\theta\) is contained in \(g(s(y), \theta)\), the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) can be determined by maximizing \(g(s(y), \theta)\) with respect to \(\theta\). This shows that the MLE is a function of \(s(y)\).
04

Determining Observed Information

The observed information is determined as the negative of the second derivative of the log-likelihood function, \(-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \theta^2} \log L(\theta; y)\). Since \(L(\theta; y) \equiv g(s(y), \theta)h(y)\) and \(h(y)\) does not depend on \(\theta\), differentiation impacts only \(g(s(y), \theta)\). As such, the observed information depends on the data only through \(s(y)\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sufficient Statistic
A sufficient statistic is a concept used in statistics to capture all necessary information from a dataset about a parameter of interest. Here, the parameter is denoted by \(\theta\). It's important because it reduces the data set to a simpler form without losing any relevant information regarding \(\theta\). This makes analyzing and understanding the data easier. For a statistic \(s(y)\) to be considered sufficient, it must meet a special condition called the factorization criterion.

The factorization theorem states that a statistic \(s(y)\) is sufficient for the parameter \(\theta\) if you can express the likelihood function \(f(y; \theta)\) as a product of two functions: \(g(s(y), \theta)\) and \(h(y)\).
This can be written as:
\[L(\theta; y) = f(y; \theta) = g(s(y), \theta) h(y)\]

Here's what these functions mean:
  • \(g(s(y), \theta)\) is a function of the sufficient statistic \(s(y)\) and the parameter \(\theta\).
  • \(h(y)\) is a function of the data \(y\) but does not depend on \(\theta\).
This factorization implies that \(s(y)\) captures all the information about \(\theta\), making it sufficient. Information not related to \(\theta\) is absorbed by \(h(y)\), ensuring that \(s(y)\) contains all the necessary information regarding the estimation of \(\theta\). This efficient use of data is crucial in statistical analysis.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) is a method used to estimate the parameter \(\theta\) of a statistical model. It finds the parameter value that makes the observed data most probable. In technical terms, it maximizes the likelihood function \(L(\theta; y)\).

To perform MLE, you first express the likelihood function \(L(\theta; y)\) using the factorization theorem:
\[L(\theta; y) = g(s(y), \theta) h(y)\]
Since \(h(y)\) does not affect \(\theta\), the task is to maximize \(g(s(y), \theta)\) with respect to \(\theta\).

Here's the process:
  • Focus on the part of the likelihood function that involves both \(s(y)\) and \(\theta\).
  • Ignore \(h(y)\) because it does not change with different \(\theta\) values.
  • Find the \(\theta\) that makes \(g(s(y), \theta)\) the largest.
This maximization gives you the Maximum Likelihood Estimator, ensuring that the estimate depends only on \(s(y)\), making MLE data-efficient and effective with a sufficient statistic. The elegance of MLE is its reliance on the part of the data \(s(y)\) that truly matters for \(\theta\), optimizing the estimation process.
Observed Information
Observed Information in statistics provides insights into the precision of the Maximum Likelihood Estimation. It sheds light on how much information the data carries about the parameter \(\theta\). It's linked to the curvature of the likelihood function. Mathematically, observed information is the negative of the second derivative of the log-likelihood function with respect to \(\theta\):

\[-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \theta^2} \log L(\theta; y)\]

After using the factorization theorem, we know that the log-likelihood function can be broken into parts:
\[\log L(\theta; y) = \log g(s(y), \theta) + \log h(y)\]
Since \(h(y)\) is independent of \(\theta\), it doesn't affect the differentiation. Thus, only \(g(s(y), \theta)\) impacts observed information.

Here’s why it’s important:
  • The steeper the curve of \(\log L(\theta; y)\), the more precise is the estimation of \(\theta\).
  • A flat curve indicates less certainty.
Observed information effectively tells us how "peaked" the likelihood function is around the maximum likeliness estimate, which directly informs us about the estimator's variability. By focusing on the sufficient statistic \(s(y)\), we efficiently capture this measure of precision from the data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a normal linear model through the origin, independent observations \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) are such that \(Y_{j} \sim N\left(\beta x_{j}, \sigma^{2}\right)\). Show that the log likelihood for a sample \(y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}\) is $$ \ell\left(\beta, \sigma^{2}\right)=-\frac{n}{2} \log \left(2 \pi \sigma^{2}\right)-\frac{1}{2 \sigma^{2}} \sum_{j=1}^{n}\left(y_{j}-\beta x_{j}\right)^{2} $$ Deduce that the likelihood equations are equivalent to \(\sum x_{j}\left(y_{j}-\widehat{\beta} x_{j}\right)=0\) and \(\hat{\sigma}^{2}=\) \(n^{-1} \sum\left(y_{j}-\widehat{\beta} x_{j}\right)^{2}\), and hence find the maximum likelihood estimates \(\widehat{\beta}\) and \(\widehat{\sigma}^{2}\) for data with \(x=(1,2,3,4,5)\) and \(y=(2.81,5.48,7.11,8.69,11.28)\) Show that the observed information matrix evaluated at the maximum likelihood estimates is diagonal and use it to obtain approximate \(95 \%\) confidence intervals for the parameters. Plot the data and your fitted line \(y=\widehat{\beta} x\). Say whether you think the model is correct, with reasons. Discuss the adequacy of the normal approximations in this example.

A location-scale model with parameters \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) has density $$ f(y ; \mu, \sigma)=\frac{1}{\sigma} g\left(\frac{y-\mu}{\sigma}\right), \quad-\infty0 $$ (a) Show that the information in a single observation has form $$ i(\mu, \sigma)=\sigma^{-2}\left(\begin{array}{ll} a & b \\ b & c \end{array}\right) $$ and express \(a, b\), and \(c\) in terms of \(h(\cdot)=\log g(\cdot) .\) Show that \(b=0\) if \(g\) is symmetric about zero, and discuss the implications for the joint distribution of the maximum likelihood estimators \(\widehat{\mu}\) and \(\widehat{\sigma}\) when \(g\) is regular. (b) Find \(a, b\), and \(c\) for the normal density \((2 \pi)^{-1 / 2} e^{-u^{2} / 2}\) and the log-gamma density \(\exp \left(\kappa u-e^{u}\right) / \Gamma(\kappa)\), where \(\kappa>0\) is known.

If \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n} \stackrel{\text { iid }}{\sim} N\left(\mu, c \mu^{2}\right)\), where \(c\) is a known constant, show that the minimal sufficient statistic for \(\mu\) is the same as for the \(N\left(\mu, \sigma^{2}\right)\) distribution. Find the maximum likelihood estimate of \(\mu\) and give its large-sample standard error. Show that the distribution of \(\bar{Y}^{2} / S^{2}\) does not depend on \(\mu\).

A family has two children \(A\) and \(B .\) Child \(A\) catches an infectious disease \(\mathcal{D}\) which is so rare that the probability that \(B\) catches it other than from \(A\) can be ignored. Child \(A\) is infectious for a time \(U\) having probability density function \(\alpha e^{-\alpha u}, u \geq 0\), and in any small interval of time \([t, t+\delta t]\) in \([0, U), B\) will catch \(\mathcal{D}\) from \(A\) with probability \(\beta \delta t+o(\delta t)\) where \(\alpha, \beta>0 .\) Calculate the probability \(\rho\) that \(B\) does catch \(\mathcal{D} .\) Show that, in a family where \(B\) is actually infected, the density function of the time to infection is \(\gamma e^{-\gamma t}, t \geq 0\) where \(\gamma=\alpha+\beta\) An epidemiologist observes \(n\) independent similar families, in \(r\) of which the second child catches \(\mathcal{D}\) from the first, at times \(t_{1}, \ldots, t_{r} .\) Write down the likelihood of the data as the product of the probability of observing \(r\) and the likelihood of the fixed sample \(t_{1}, \ldots, t_{r}\). Find the maximum likelihood estimators \(\widehat{\rho}\) and \(\widehat{\gamma}\) of \(\rho\) and \(\gamma\), and the asymptotic variance of \(\widehat{\gamma}\)

Show that the score statistic for a variable \(Y\) from the uniform density on \((0, \theta)\) is \(U(\theta)=\) \(-\theta^{-1}\) in the range \(0\theta\end{cases} $$ Show that as \(n \rightarrow \infty, Z_{n}=n(\theta-\widehat{\theta}) / \theta \stackrel{D}{\longrightarrow} E\), where \(E\) is exponential.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.