/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 Suppose an observational study f... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 5: Problem 7

Suppose an observational study finds that people who use public transportation to get to work have better knowledge of current affairs than those who drive to work, but that the relationship is weaker for well-educated people. What term from this chapter (for example, response variable) applies to each of the following variables? a. Method of getting to work b. Knowledge of current affairs c. Level of education d. Whether the participant reads a daily newspaper

Short Answer

Expert verified
a: explanatory, b: response, c: moderating, d: confounding

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Variables

In the exercise, we have four variables to identify from the context of an observational study: method of getting to work (a), knowledge of current affairs (b), level of education (c), and whether the participant reads a daily newspaper (d). Each of these plays a role in the study's design and interpretation.
02

Determine the Role of Each Variable

For variable (a) 'Method of getting to work,' since it's used to compare different groups (public transport vs. driving) to see how it affects knowledge, it acts as the explanatory variable. Variable (b) 'Knowledge of current affairs' is the outcome being measured, making it the response variable. Variable (c) 'Level of education' is a characteristic that affects the strength of the relationship between the method of getting to work and knowledge, so it is a moderating variable. Lastly, variable (d) 'Whether the participant reads a daily newspaper' is not directly mentioned in the relation but could be a confounding variable affecting knowledge unrelated to the travel method.
03

Assign Terms to Variables

Based on their roles in the study, assign the appropriate terms to each variable: (a) Method of getting to work is the explanatory variable, (b) Knowledge of current affairs is the response variable, (c) Level of education is a moderating variable, and (d) Whether the participant reads a daily newspaper is a potential confounding variable. Ensure to note that these roles are determined by their impact and the study's aim.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Explanatory Variable
In an observational study, the explanatory variable is the one that we think might influence another variable. It helps us understand the cause-effect relationship that we are curious about. Think of it as the part of the experiment we change to see what happens.
In the context of our exercise, the explanatory variable is 'Method of getting to work.' The researchers are examining if using public transportation or driving to work makes a difference in people鈥檚 knowledge of current affairs.
  • It helps separate groups - in this case, public transportation users vs. drivers.
  • It's what we believe might cause changes in what we are trying to measure, which is another variable - the response variable.
While the explanatory variable doesn't necessarily "cause" changes all by itself, it helps highlight potential patterns or influences in observational studies.
Response Variable
The response variable is what researchers measure or observe as an outcome. It's the primary point of the study. In simple terms, it's what we want to see changing when we change other things.
In the example given, the response variable is 'Knowledge of current affairs.' The level of knowledge is what the study aims to see a change in or an effect on based on the method of getting to work.
  • This variable reflects the outcome or result of interactions between other variables, like the explanatory variable.
  • It's crucial because it gives us data about the impact of differences in the explanatory variable.
Always remember, in studies, the response variable indicates the point of interest concerning the research question.
Confounding Variable
Confounding variables can make the relationship between the explanatory and response variable less clear. They are like hidden characters in a play that influence the outcome without being directly accounted for.
In the exercise, 'Whether the participant reads a daily newspaper' is labeled as a confounding variable. Imagine it this way: those who read newspapers might naturally know more about current events, regardless of how they get to work.
  • These variables can provide false or distorted interpretations of the data.
  • They introduce additional variability, making it harder to see pure effects of the explanatory variable on the response variable.
By identifying confounding variables, researchers aim to control or account for them, clarifying relationships in the study.
Moderating Variable
Moderating variables influence the strength or direction of the relationship between the explanatory and the response variable. Think of it as an adjuster or a filter that alters how the other variables interact.
In our study context, 'Level of education' is the moderating variable. It affects how strongly or weakly the method of getting to work influences the knowledge of current affairs.
  • It doesn't directly cause changes in the response variable.
  • It adjusts or modifies the strength or direction of how the explanatory variable affects the response variable.
Understanding moderating variables helps provide a clearer picture of the dynamics within the study, offering deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose researchers were interested in determining the relationship. if any, between brain cancer and the use of cell phones. Would it be better to use a randomized experiment or a case-control study? Explain.

A headline in the Sacramento Bee (11 December 1997. p. A15) read. - Study: Daily drink cuts death:" and the article began with the statement, "One drink a day can be good for health, scientists are reporting, confirming earlier research in a new study that is the largest to date of the effects of alcohol consumption in the United States." The article also noted that "most subjects were white, middle-class and married, and more likely than the rest of the U.S. population to be collegeeducated." Explain why this study could not have been a randomized experiment.

To test the effects of drugs and alcohol use on driving performance, 20 volunteers were each asked to take a driving test under three conditions: sober, after two drinks, and after smoking marijuana. The order in which they drove the three conditions was randomized. An evaluator watched them drive on a test course and rated their accuracy on a scale from 1 to 10 , without knowing which condition they were under each time. a. What was the explanatory variable in this experiment? b. What was the response variable in this experiment? c. Was this experiment single-blind, double-blind, or neither? Explain. d. Did this experiment use matched pairs, blocks, or neither? Explain.

A company wants to know if placing live green plants in workers' offices will help reduce stress. Employees will be randomly chosen to participate, and plants will be delivered to their offices. One week after they are delivered, all employees will be given a stress questionnaire and those who received plants will be compared with those who did not. Explain which of the "difficulties and disasters" is most likely to be a problem in this experiment, and why.

Suppose a study found that people who drive more than 10 miles to work each day have better knowledge of current events, on average, than people who ride a bicycle to work. a. What is the explanatory variable in this study? b. What is the response variable in this study? c. It was found that people who drive more than 10 miles to work each day also listen to the news on the radio more often than people who ride a bicycle to work. Explain how the variable "how often a person listens to the news on the radio" fits the two properties of a confounding variable (given in the box) for this study.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Statistics

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.