/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Would probabilities estimated us... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Would probabilities estimated using simulation be considered to be relative- frequency probabilities or personal probabilities? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Probabilities estimated using simulation are considered relative-frequency probabilities.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Types of Probabilities

Two main types of probabilities are relative-frequency probabilities and personal probabilities. Relative-frequency probability is the likelihood of an event occurring based on the frequency of occurrence in repeated trials or experiments. Personal probability represents an individual's degree of belief that an event will occur.
02

Define Simulation

Simulation is a method of imitating a real-world process or system over time. It often uses random number generators to mimic the random nature of certain phenomena, allowing us to estimate the likelihood of various outcomes.
03

Identify Simulation's Role in Probability

In the context of probability estimation, simulations are often used to model complex systems where direct calculations are difficult or impossible. These simulations are run multiple times to derive probabilities based on the outcomes of the simulation runs.
04

Compare with Relative-Frequency Probability

Since simulation involves running a model multiple times to observe how often different outcomes occur, the probability estimated by simulation reflects the principle of relative-frequency probability. The more iterations we run, the closer our results align with the typical definition of relative frequency.
05

Consider Personal Probability

Personal probability is subjective and based on personal judgment or belief. In contrast, simulation relies on objective data collected through repeated trials, which is not influenced by personal belief. Therefore, probabilities derived from simulations are not categorized as personal probabilities.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Relative-Frequency Probability
Relative-frequency probability is a fundamental concept in probability education. It describes the probability of an event as the ratio of the number of times the event occurs to the total number of trials in an experiment or observation. This type of probability is based on empirical data and requires repeated experimentation.
For example, if we toss a coin 100 times and observe 55 heads, the relative-frequency probability of getting a head is calculated as 55 divided by 100, which equals 0.55. This method offers an objective way to determine probabilities based on real-world data.
It is important to note that as we increase the number of trials, the relative-frequency probability converges to the true probability, assuming the process is stable. This convergence highlights the law of large numbers: with more data points, the estimated probability becomes more reliable and accurate.
Simulation Method
The simulation method is a powerful tool in probability estimation and statistics when dealing with complex systems. It involves creating a simplified model of a real-world process and then repeatedly running the simulated model to observe the outcomes.
One of the key advantages of simulation is its ability to handle situations where analytical solutions are difficult or impossible to derive. By using random number generators, simulations can mimic the inherent randomness of real events, providing a robust way to estimate probabilities.
  • Simulations are especially useful in scenarios such as modeling traffic flow, predicting weather patterns, or even financial forecasting.
  • They allow experimentation without the need for actual physical trials, saving time and resources.
Probabilities estimated from simulations align with the relative-frequency probability concept, since they depend on the frequency of outcomes across repeated trials.
Personal Probability
Personal probability, also known as subjective probability, is different from the more objective relative-frequency approach. It represents an individual's personal belief or degree of certainty that a particular event will occur.
This type of probability is not based on empirical data or repeated trials. Instead, it is influenced by individual experiences, intuition, and information available to the person making the probability assessment.
For example, someone might assign a personal probability of 70% to the chance of rain tomorrow based on their observation of the sky and weather forecast, even if meteorological data suggests otherwise.
It’s important to understand that personal probabilities can vary from one individual to another, as they are subjective. As such, they are not used in simulation models, which rely on objective and consistent probability estimations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose a teacher observed a correlation of 0.38 between age and number of words children could define on a vocabulary test, for a group of nine children aged 7 to \(15 .\) The teacher wanted to confirm that there was a correlation between age and vocabulary test scores for the population of children in this age range. She performed a simulation with 1000 randomized orders, scrambling the test scores across the ages, similar to the simulation used in Example \(15.3 .\) She was surprised to find that \(29 \%\) of the simulated samples resulted in correlations of 0.38 or larger, even though there should not have been any correlation between ages and the scrambled test scores. a. What null and alternative hypotheses was the teacher testing? b. What is the estimated \(p\) -value for her test? c. Do these results confirm that there is no correlation between age and vocabulary scores for the population of children aged 7 to \(15 ?\) Explain. (Hint: Remember the legitimate conclusions for testing hypotheses.) d. Would a simulation with 10,000 randomized orders be much more likely, much less likely, or about equally likely to enable the teacher to reject the null hypothesis, compared to the simulation performed with 1000 randomized orders? e. The teacher plans to repeat the experiment. What could she do differently to improve the chance of rejecting the null hypothesis?

Suppose that the chi-square statistic for a chisquare test on a table with 2 rows and 2 columns was computed to be \(2.90 .\) A simulation was run with 1000 simulated samples, and 918 of them resulted in chi-square statistics of less than \(2.90 .\) What is the estimated \(p\) -value for the test?

Three males and three females are given 5 minutes to memorize a list of 25 words, and then asked to recall as many of them as possible. The three males recalled \(10,12,\) and 14 of the words, for an average of 12 words; the three females recalled \(11,14,\) and 17 of the words, for an average of 14 words. a. In comparing males' and females' ability for memorization, what would be reasonable null and alternative hypotheses to test in this situation? b. The difference in means for the two groups in this sample was two words. Using that as the "test statistic," explain how you could carry out a permutation test in this situation. c. Give one example of a permutation from the method you explained in part (b), and what the "test statistic" would be for that permutation.

Suppose that the chi-square statistic for a chisquare test on a table with 2 rows and 2 columns was computed to be \(5.3 .\) A simulation was run with 10,000 simulated samples, and 217 of them resulted in chi-square statistics of 5.3 or larger. What is the estimated \(p\) -value for the test?

Refer to the box, describing the website www.randomizer.org. Parts (a) to (e) in each of these exercises list the questions asked when you use that website. In each case, specify how you would answer those questions. In Exercise 6 , the following scenario was presented. Suppose that \(55 \%\) of the voters in a large city support a particular candidate for mayor and \(45 \%\) do not support the candidate. A poll of 100 voters will be conducted, and the proportion of them who support the candidate will be found. For this exercise, you want to simulate 1000 polls of 100 people each, and find the proportion of those polls for which 49 or fewer support the candidate. That will provide an estimate of the probability that the poll shows less than majority support, even though in truth \(55 \%\) of the population supports the candidate. For parts (a) to (e), specify what you would answer for each of the questions to accomplish this simulation using www.randomizerorg. Remember that the simulator will not allow you to specify different weights for the outcomes, so you need to figure out how to incorporate the 0.55 and 0.45 probabilities into your simulation. a. How many sets of numbers do you want to generate? b. How many numbers per set? c. Number range (e.g., \(1-50\) ). d. Do you wish each number in a set to remain unique? e. Do you wish to sort the numbers that are generated? f. Once you had the results of the simulation, how would you use them to estimate the desired probability?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.