/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 Is it harder to find statistical... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Is it harder to find statistical significance using a test with level 0.05 or a test with level \(0.01 ?\) In other words, would a test that is statistically significant using 0.05 always be statistically significant using 0.01, would it be the other way around, or does it depend on the situation? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
It's harder to find significance at 0.01 than at 0.05; significance at 0.01 implies significance at 0.05, but not vice versa.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Significance Levels

The significance level of a test, denoted by alpha (\( \alpha \)), is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. A common choice for \( \alpha \) is 0.05, which corresponds to a 5% risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis. Similarly, an alpha of 0.01 indicates a 1% risk. Thus, the lower the \( \alpha \) level, the stricter the criterion for significance.
02

Comparing Alpha Levels 0.05 and 0.01

When a test is significant at the 0.05 level, it means there is at most a 5% probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. If the same test is to be significant at the 0.01 level, the evidence against the null hypothesis must be stronger since it allows only a 1% probability of such a mistake. Therefore, a result significant at the 0.05 level might not necessarily be significant at the 0.01 level.
03

Inferential Implications

Since the 0.01 level is more stringent than the 0.05 level, achieving statistical significance at the 0.01 level is harder. Consequently, a result that is statistically significant at the 0.01 level will always be significant at the 0.05 level because it meets the stricter requirement. However, the opposite is not true: a test result significant at the 0.05 level may not be significant at the 0.01 level, as it requires finer evidence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a key concept in hypothesis testing that helps us decide whether the results of a study are likely due to chance or reflect a true effect. When we say a result is statistically significant, it implies the observed data is strong enough to reject the null hypothesis. This doesn't prove the alternative hypothesis true, but it does suggest it's more plausible than the null hypothesis.

Think of it like a detective determining if there's enough evidence to accuse someone of a crime. Statistical significance asks the question: "Is there enough evidence to doubt the null hypothesis?" We rely on mathematical tools and significance levels to make this judgment, and understanding these tools can guide how we interpret data results effectively.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a fundamental part of statistical testing. It assumes there is no effect or no difference, acting as a baseline or status quo against which we measure our test results. Imagine a new drug trial where the null hypothesis states the drug has no effect on patients compared to a placebo.

Our goal is to test whether we can reject this null hypothesis in favor of an alternative hypothesis, which might claim the drug does have an effect.
  • The null hypothesis is usually denoted as "H鈧."
  • Rejecting the null hypothesis suggests there is statistical significance, and the alternative hypothesis (H鈧) may be true.
  • If we fail to reject the null hypothesis, there's insufficient evidence against it at the set significance level.
It's crucial to note that failing to reject does not prove the null hypothesis true; it simply means there isn't enough evidence to dismiss it confidently.
Alpha Level
The alpha level (\( \alpha \)) represents the threshold of probability that dictates whether a result is statistically significant. Common alpha levels are 0.05 and 0.01, reflecting 5% and 1% risks of making a Type I error, respectively. A Type I error occurs when we wrongly reject the null hypothesis.

Determining the alpha level involves a balance:
  • Lower alpha levels (\( \alpha = 0.01 \)) mean stricter criteria for significance, reducing the chance of Type I errors but requiring stronger evidence.
  • Higher alpha levels (\( \alpha = 0.05 \)) allow slightly more room for Type I errors, doubling as more lenient benchmarks for determining significance.
In practical terms, a test significant at 0.01 will always be significant at 0.05, as 0.01 is a more demanding threshold. However, the reverse is not guaranteed because a 0.05 result may not drop below the stricter 0.01 threshold.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This is a continuation of Exercise 20 in Chapter \(12 .\) A case-control study in Berlin, reported by Kohlmeier et al. (1992) and by Hand et al. (1994), asked 239 lung cancer patients and 429 controls (matched to the cases by age and sex) whether they had kept a pet bird during adulthood. of the 239 lung cancer cases, 98 said yes. of the 429 controls, 101 said yes. a. State the null and alternative hypotheses for this situation. b. Construct a contingency table for the data. c. Calculate the expected counts. d. Calculate the value of the chi-square statistic. e. Make a conclusion about statistical significance using a level of \(0.05 .\) State the conclusion in the context of this situation.

"Research shows women harder hit by. hangovers" and the accompanying Original Source \(2 .\) In the study, 472 men and 758 women, all of whom were college students and alcohol drinkers, were asked about whether they had experienced each of 13 hangover symptoms in the previous year. What population do you think is represented by the sample for this study? Explain.

For each of the following possible conclusions, state whether it would follow when the \(p\) -value is less than 0.05 (assuming a level of 0.05 is desired for the test). a. Reject the null hypothesis. b. Reject the alternative hypothesis. c. Accept the null hypothesis. d. Accept the alternative hypothesis. e. The relationship is not statistically significant. f. The relationship is statistically significant. g. We do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

If there is a relationship between two variables in a population, which is more likely to result in a statistically significant relationship in a sample from that population \(-\) a small sample, a large sample, or are they equivalent? Explain.

Explain what "expected counts" represent. In other words, under what condition are they "expected"?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.