/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 80 Chapter 7 presented a CI for the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Chapter 7 presented a CI for the variance \(\sigma^{2}\) of a normal population distribution. The key result there was that the rv \(\chi^{2}=(n-1) S^{2} / \sigma^{2}\) has a chi-squared distribution with \(n-1\) df. Consider the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \sigma^{2}=\sigma_{0}^{2}\) (equivalently, \(\sigma=\sigma_{0}\). Then when \(H_{0}\) is true, the test statistic \(\chi^{2}=(n-1) \quad S^{2} / \sigma_{0}^{2}\) has a chi-squared distribution with \(n-1\) df. If the relevant alternative is \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \sigma^{2}>\sigma_{0}^{2}\), rejecting \(H_{0}\) if \((n-1) s^{2} / \sigma_{0}^{2} \geq \chi_{\alpha, n-1}^{2}\) gives a test with significance level \(\alpha\). To ensure reasonably uniform characteristics for a particular application, it is desired that the true standard deviation of the softening point of a certain type of petroleum pitch be at most \(.50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The softening points of ten different specimens were determined, yielding a sample standard deviation of \(.58^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Does this strongly contradict the uniformity specification? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The test does not strongly contradict the uniformity specification.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Hypotheses

For this problem, the null hypothesis is \( H_0: \sigma^2 = \sigma_0^2 \), which means \( \sigma = 0.50 \text{ °C} \). The alternative hypothesis is \( H_a: \sigma^2 > \sigma_0^2 \), indicating that the standard deviation is greater than \( 0.50 \text{ °C} \).
02

Gather Data and Parameters

We have a sample size \( n = 10 \) and a sample standard deviation of \( s = 0.58 \text{ °C} \). The level of significance \( \alpha = 0.01 \).
03

Calculate Test Statistic

Use the formula \( \chi^2 = \frac{(n-1)s^2}{\sigma_0^2} \) to compute the test statistic. Here, \( \sigma_0 = 0.50 \text{ °C} \), so the test statistic is \[ \chi^2 = \frac{(10-1) \times (0.58)^2}{(0.50)^2} = \frac{9 \times 0.3364}{0.25} = \frac{3.0276}{0.25} = 12.1104 \].
04

Find Critical Value

Refer to the chi-square distribution table with \( df = n - 1 = 9 \) for \( \alpha = 0.01 \). The critical value \( \chi^2_{\alpha,n-1} \) is approximately 21.67.
05

Compare Test Statistic with Critical Value

The calculated test statistic \( \chi^2 = 12.1104 \) is less than the critical value 21.67. Therefore, we do not reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \).
06

Conclude the Hypothesis Test

Since the test statistic does not exceed the critical value, we do not have enough evidence to say that the true standard deviation of the softening points is greater than \( 0.50 \text{ °C} \) at a \( 0.01 \) significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Squared Distribution
The chi-squared distribution is a vital concept in hypothesis testing, especially when dealing with variance or standard deviation. It is a distribution that emerges when you square standard normal variables and sum them up. Chi-squared distribution is denoted as \(\chi^2\) and is used extensively because of its ability to model the distribution of sample variance.

This distribution is characterized by its degrees of freedom (df). The degrees of freedom typically correspond to the sample size minus one, represented as \(n-1\). In hypothesis testing, it helps us understand how likely or unlikely a test statistic is under the null hypothesis.
  • For our problem, the chi-squared statistic is computed using the formula \(\chi^2 = \frac{(n-1)S^2}{\sigma_0^2}\).
  • The test statistic follows a chi-squared distribution with \(n-1\) degrees of freedom.
The chi-squared distribution provides the critical value, against which the test statistic is compared to decide whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, commonly denoted as \(H_0\), is a foundational idea in statistical hypothesis testing. It functions as a starting assumption or statement that there is no effect or no difference, which the hypothesis test seeks to support or reject.

In the problem context, the null hypothesis states that the variance \(\sigma^2\) of the petroleum pitch's softening point is equal to a specific variance \(\sigma_0^2\), which translates to a standard deviation of 0.50 °C.
  • Symbolically, this is expressed as \(H_0: \sigma^2 = \sigma_0^2\).
  • The null hypothesis posits that the observed data arises from a population with this variance.
Testing this null hypothesis with sample data involves calculating a test statistic and comparing it to a critical value derived from a chi-squared distribution. If the statistic exceeds the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating a statistically significant difference.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted as \(\alpha\), is a threshold used in hypothesis testing that determines when to reject the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of making a Type I error - rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

In this scenario, the significance level is set at \(0.01\), meaning there is a 1% risk of concluding that the pitch’s standard deviation is greater than 0.50 °C when in fact, it is not.
  • A lower \(\alpha\) value indicates a stricter criterion for rejecting \(H_0\).
  • Critical values are derived from the chi-squared distribution table for the chosen \(\alpha\) and within the context of the degrees of freedom.
For this hypothesis test, the significance level helps define the critical region. If the test statistic calculated from the sample data falls within this critical region, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted \(H_a\), offers a different perspective to the null hypothesis. It represents the outcome that the test is attempting to provide evidence for, essentially stating there is an effect or difference.

In this exercise, the alternative hypothesis is that the variance \(\sigma^2\) of the petroleum pitch's softening point is greater than the specified variance \(\sigma_0^2\), leading to a standard deviation exceeding 0.50 °C.
  • The alternative hypothesis is symbolized as \(H_a: \sigma^2 > \sigma_0^2\).
  • This hypothesis is only considered if the null hypothesis is rejected.
The aim of the hypothesis test is to establish enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative, suggesting that the true standard deviation indeed exceeds the desired specification.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose the population distribution is normal with known \(\sigma\). Let \(\gamma\) be such that \(0<\gamma<\alpha\). For testing \(H_{0}: \mu=\mu_{0}\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu \neq \mu_{0}\), consider the test that rejects \(H_{0}\) if either \(z \geq z_{\gamma}\) or \(z \leq-z_{\alpha-\gamma}\), where the test statistic is \(Z=\left(\bar{X}-\mu_{0}\right) /\) \((\sigma / \sqrt{n})\) a. Show that \(P\) (type I error) \(=\alpha\). b. Derive an expression for \(\beta\left(\mu^{\prime}\right)\). [Hint: Express the test in the form "reject \(H_{0}\) if either \(\bar{x} \geq c_{1}\) or \(\leq c_{2}\)."] c. Let \(\Delta>0\). For what values of \(\gamma\) (relative to \(\alpha\) ) will \(\beta\left(\mu_{0}+\Delta\right)<\beta\left(\mu_{0}-\Delta\right) ?\)

Many consumers are turning to generics as a way of reducing the cost of prescription medications. The article "Commercial Information on Drugs: Confusing to the Physician?" (J. of Drug Issues, 1988: 245-257) gives the results of a survey of 102 doctors. Only 47 of those surveyed knew the generic name for the drug methadone. Does this provide strong evidence for concluding that fewer than half of all physicians know the generic name for methadone? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\) using the \(P\)-value method.

The article "Caffeine Knowledge, Attitudes, and Consumption in Adult Women" ( \(J\). of Nutrition Educ., 1992: 179-184) reports the following summary data on daily caffeine consumption for a sample of adult women: \(n=47, \bar{x}=215 \mathrm{mg}\), \(s=235 \mathrm{mg}\), and range \(=5-1176 .\) a. Does it appear plausible that the population distribution of daily caffeine consumption is normal? Is it necessary to assume a normal population distribution to test hypotheses about the value of the population mean consumption? Explain your reasoning. b. Suppose it had previously been believed that mean consumption was at most \(200 \mathrm{mg}\). Does the given data contradict this prior belief? Test the appropriate hypotheses at significance level .10 and include a \(P\)-value in your analysis.

The article "Analysis of Reserve and Regular Bottlings: Why Pay for a Difference Only the Critics Claim to Notice?" (Chance, Summer 2005, pp. 9-15) reported on an experiment to investigate whether wine tasters could distinguish between more expensive reserve wines and their regular counterparts. Wine was presented to tasters in four containers labeled A, B, C, and D, with two of these containing the reserve wine and the other two the regular wine. Each taster randomly selected three of the containers, tasted the selected wines, and indicated which of the three he/she believed was different from the other two. Of the \(n=855\) tasting trials, 346 resulted in correct distinctions (either the one reserve that differed from the two regular wines or the one regular wine that differed from the two reserves). Does this provide compelling evidence for concluding that tasters of this type have some ability to distinguish between reserve and regular wines? State and test the relevant hypotheses using the \(P\)-value approach. Are you particularly impressed with the ability of tasters to distinguish between the two types of wine?

When \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) are independent Poisson variables, each with parameter \(\lambda\), and \(n\) is large, the sample mean \(\bar{X}\) has approximately a normal distribution with \(\mu=E(\bar{X})=\lambda\) and \(\sigma^{2}=V(\bar{X})=\lambda / n\). This implies that $$ Z=\frac{X-\lambda}{\sqrt{\lambda / n}} $$ has approximately a standard normal distribution. For testing \(H_{0}: \lambda=\lambda_{0}\), we can replace \(\lambda\) by \(\lambda_{0}\) in the equation for \(Z\) to obtain a test statistic. This statistic is actually preferred to the large-sample statistic with denominator \(S / \sqrt{n}\) (when the \(X_{i}\) s are Poisson) because it is tailored explicitly to the Poisson assumption. If the number of requests for consulting received by a certain statistician during a 5 -day work week has a Poisson distribution and the total number of consulting requests during a 36 -week period is 160 , does this suggest that the true average number of weekly requests exceeds 4.0? Test using \(\alpha=.02\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.