/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 27 Automatic identification of the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Automatic identification of the boundaries of significant structures within a medical image is an area of ongoing research. The paper "Automatic Segmentation of Medical Images Using Image Registration: Diagnostic and Simulation Applications" ( \(J\). of Medical Engr. and Tech., 2005: 53-63) discussed a new technique for such identification. A measure of the accuracy of the automatic region is the average linear displacement (ALD). The paper gave the following ALD observations for a sample of 49 kidneys (units of pixel dimensions). $$ \begin{array}{lllllll} 1.38 & 0.44 & 1.09 & 0.75 & 0.66 & 1.28 & 0.51 \\ 0.39 & 0.70 & 0.46 & 0.54 & 0.83 & 0.58 & 0.64 \\ 1.30 & 0.57 & 0.43 & 0.62 & 1.00 & 1.05 & 0.82 \\ 1.10 & 0.65 & 0.99 & 0.56 & 0.56 & 0.64 & 0.45 \\ 0.82 & 1.06 & 0.41 & 0.58 & 0.66 & 0.54 & 0.83 \\ 0.59 & 0.51 & 1.04 & 0.85 & 0.45 & 0.52 & 0.58 \\ 1.11 & 0.34 & 1.25 & 0.38 & 1.44 & 1.28 & 0.51 \end{array} $$ a. Summarize/describe the data. b. Is it plausible that ALD is at least approximately normally distributed? Must normality be assumed prior to calculating a CI for true average ALD or testing hypotheses about true average ALD? Explain. c. The authors commented that in most cases the ALD is better than or of the order of \(1.0\). Does the data in fact provide strong evidence for concluding that true average ALD under these circumstances is less than 1.0? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses. d. Calculate an upper confidence bound for true average ALD using a confidence level of \(95 \%\), and interpret this bound.

Short Answer

Expert verified
True average ALD is likely less than 1.0; 95% upper bound supports this.

Step by step solution

01

Organize the Data

First, list all the provided ALD observations, which are pixel values for 49 kidneys. These values will be used for all subsequent calculations.
02

Calculate Descriptive Statistics

Calculate the sample mean (\(\bar{x}\)) and sample standard deviation (\(s\)) for the given ALD values. The mean is the sum of all observations divided by the number of observations (49). The standard deviation measures the spread of the values around the mean.
03

Assess Normality

Use a visual inspection method (histogram or Q-Q plot) or a statistical test like Shapiro-Wilk to assess if the data distribution is approximately normal. For large samples, the Central Limit Theorem ensures the sample mean distribution is normal, even if the data isn't perfectly normal.
04

Formulate Hypotheses for Testing ALD < 1.0

State the null hypothesis \(H_0\): true mean ALD \(\mu \geq 1.0\) against the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\): \(\mu < 1.0\). You will use a one-sample t-test to test this hypothesis.
05

Conduct the One-Sample T-Test

Calculate the t-statistic using the formula \(t = (\bar{x} - \mu_0) / (s/\sqrt{n})\), where \(\mu_0 = 1.0\), \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(s\) is the sample standard deviation, and \(n\) is the sample size. Compare the t-statistic against the critical t-value for 48 degrees of freedom at a chosen significance level (e.g., \(\alpha = 0.05\)).
06

Make a Deduction Based on the T-Test

If the t-statistic falls in the rejection region (less than the critical value), reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the true average ALD is less than 1.0.
07

Calculate Upper Confidence Bound

Use the formula for the one-sided confidence interval: \(\bar{x} + t_{(n-1, \alpha)} \times \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\), where \(t_{(n-1, \alpha)}\) is the critical t-value for 95% confidence level and 48 degrees of freedom. This value is the upper bound for the true average ALD.
08

Interpret the Confidence Bound

The computed upper confidence bound suggests that we are 95% confident that the true average ALD is less than or equal to this value, confirming if it aligns with the hypothesis test conclusion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Descriptive Statistics
When you're working with numerical data, such as the average linear displacement (ALD) measurements in pixel values, descriptive statistics provide a fundamental summary. They help us understand the data's basic characteristics without diving deep into complex calculations.
Descriptive statistics primarily include:
  • **Mean**: This is the average value. You calculate the mean by adding up all the measurements and dividing by the total number of observations, which in this case is 49. The mean gives us a central tendency of the data, helping us see what a typical ALD value might look like.
  • **Standard Deviation**: This measures how much the data values spread out from the mean. A small standard deviation indicates data points are close to the mean, while a large standard deviation shows they've spread out over a larger range. This will be important because understanding the spread gives context to the mean value.
Understanding the descriptive statistics for the ALD data will provide a clear view of what the typical measurement looks like and how consistent these measurements are. This foundational knowledge will also be crucial as you explore further statistical analysis.
Normal Distribution
Determining whether data follows a normal distribution is a key step in statistical analysis. A normal distribution looks like a bell-shaped curve and tells us that most values cluster around the mean, with fewer values at the extremes.
To check if the ALD data is approximately normally distributed:
  • **Visual Inspection**: You can look at a histogram or a Q-Q plot. A histogram will help you visually assess if the data forms a bell-shaped curve. Meanwhile, a Q-Q plot compares your data to a perfect normal distribution, and if the points fall along a straight line, your data is likely normal.
  • **Statistical Tests**: Tests like the Shapiro-Wilk test quantitatively assess normality. They give a "p-value" which, if below a threshold (like 0.05), suggests the data is not normally distributed.
Understanding whether your data is normal is crucial because many statistical tests assume normality, impacting the validity of conclusions drawn from your data analysis.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is like a detective tool in statistics. It helps you infer about a population based on sample data. For the ALD data, we want to test if the true average pixel measurement is less than 1.0.
Here's how hypothesis testing works for ALD:
  • **Null Hypothesis** (\(H_0\)): This is the assumption that the true mean ALD is greater than or equal to 1.0. It's like assuming no change or difference at the start.
  • **Alternative Hypothesis** (\(H_a\)): This posits the true mean ALD is less than 1.0, which we're looking to support with evidence.
  • **T-Test**: You use a one-sample t-test to examine our hypotheses since it compares sample mean against a known value (1.0 in this case). The t-statistic derived from this test helps determine if our sample provides enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
  • **Decision Making**: Compare the calculated t-statistic with a critical value from the t-distribution. If it falls in the rejection zone (usually determined by a significance level like 0.05), you reject the null hypothesis, suggesting the mean is likely less than 1.0.
Mastering hypothesis testing allows you to draw informed conclusions about your data, going beyond simple observations.
Confidence Interval
Confidence intervals offer a range where we believe the true mean of a population lies based on sample data. For ALD, constructing a 95% confidence interval helps us understand where the true average might fall, beyond just the sample mean you computed.
Confidence intervals are calculated using:
  • **Sample Mean**: The average of your observations, representing a central value.
  • **Standard Deviation**: This gives a sense of how much the data varies, affecting the width of your interval.
  • **Critical Value**: From the t-distribution, this value reflects your desired confidence level (in this case, 95%).
The formula for the upper confidence bound is:\[ \bar{x} + t_{(n-1, \alpha)} \times \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \]Where \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean, \( t_{(n-1, \alpha)} \) is the critical t-value, \( s \) is the standard deviation, and \( n \) is the sample size.
A 95% confidence interval for ALD implies that we're 95% confident the true mean ALD falls within this range. It provides a statistical safety net for your estimate, offering a more comprehensive view than the point estimate alone.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A sample of 12 radon detectors of a certain type was selected, and each was exposed to \(100 \mathrm{pCi} / \mathrm{L}\) of radon. The resulting readings were as follows: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrr} 105.6 & 90.9 & 91.2 & 96.9 & 96.5 & 91.3 \\ 100.1 & 105.0 & 99.6 & 107.7 & 103.3 & 92.4 \end{array} $$ a. Does this data suggest that the population mean reading under these conditions differs from 100 ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\). b. Suppose that prior to the experiment, a value of \(\sigma=7.5\) had been assumed. How many determinations would then have been appropriate to obtain \(\beta=.10\) for the alternative \(\mu=95\) ?

Give as much information as you can about the \(P\)-value of a \(t\) test in each of the following situations: a. Upper-tailed test, \(\mathrm{df}=8, t=2.0\) b. Lower-tailed test, df \(=11, t=-2.4\) c. Two-tailed test, \(\mathrm{df}=15, t=-1.6\) d. Upper-tailed test, df \(=19, t=-.4\) e. Upper-tailed test, df \(=5, t=5.0\) f. Two-tailed test, df \(=40, t=-4.8\)

Before agreeing to purchase a large order of polyethylene sheaths for a particular type of high-pressure oil-filled submarine power cable, a company wants to see conclusive evidence that the true standard deviation of sheath thickness is less than \(.05 \mathrm{~mm}\). What hypotheses should be tested, and why? In this context, what are the type I and type II errors?

A university library ordinarily has a complete shelf inventory done once every year. Because of new shelving rules instituted the previous year, the head librarian believes it may be possible to save money by postponing the inventory. The librarian decides to select at random 1000 books from the library's collection and have them searched in a preliminary manner. If evidence indicates strongly that the true proportion of misshelved or unlocatable books is less than \(.02\), then the inventory will be postponed. a. Among the 1000 books searched, 15 were misshelved or unlocatable. Test the relevant hypotheses and advise the librarian what to do (use \(\alpha=.05\) ). b. If the true proportion of misshelved and lost books is actually .01, what is the probability that the inventory will be (unnecessarily) taken? c. If the true proportion is \(.05\), what is the probability that the inventory will be postponed?

The article "Orchard Floor Management Utilizing SoilApplied Coal Dust for Frost Protection" (Agri. and Forest Meteorology, 1988: 71-82) reports the following values for soil heat flux of eight plots covered with coal dust. \(\begin{array}{llllllll}34.7 & 35.4 & 34.7 & 37.7 & 32.5 & 28.0 & 18.4 & 24.9\end{array}\) The mean soil heat flux for plots covered only with grass is 29.0. Assuming that the heat-flux distribution is approximately normal, does the data suggest that the coal dust is effective in increasing the mean heat flux over that for grass? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.