/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 Suppose the true average growth ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose the true average growth \(\mu\) of one type of plant during a l-year period is identical to that of a second type, but the variance of growth for the first type is \(\sigma^{2}\), whereas for the second type, the variance is \(4 \sigma^{2}\). Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{m}\) be \(m\) independent growth observations on the first type [so \(E\left(X_{i}\right)=\mu\), \(V\left(X_{i}\right)=\sigma^{2}\), and let \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) be \(n\) independent growth observations on the second type \(\left[E\left(Y_{i}\right)=\mu, V\left(Y_{i}\right)=4 \sigma^{2}\right]\). a. Show that for any \(\delta\) between 0 and 1 , the estimator \(\hat{\mu}=\) \(\delta \bar{X}+(1-\delta) \bar{Y}\) is unbiased for \(\mu\). b. For fixed \(m\) and \(n\), compute \(V(\hat{\mu})\), and then find the value of \(\delta\) that minimizes \(V(\hat{\mu})\). [Hint: Differentiate \(V(\hat{\mu})\) with respect to \(\delta\).]

Short Answer

Expert verified
\( \hat{\mu} \) is unbiased, and \( \delta = \frac{4m}{n + 4m} \) minimizes \( V(\hat{\mu}) \).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to show that an estimator \( \hat{\mu} = \delta \bar{X} + (1-\delta) \bar{Y} \) is unbiased for \( \mu \) using the given observations of two plant types. Then, we need to find the variance \( V(\hat{\mu}) \) and the value of \( \delta \) that minimizes this variance.
02

Calculate the Expectation of \( \hat{\mu} \)

The expectation of an estimator \( \hat{\mu} = \delta \bar{X} + (1-\delta) \bar{Y} \) is given by \( E(\hat{\mu}) = \delta E(\bar{X}) + (1-\delta) E(\bar{Y}) \). Since \( E(X_i) = \mu \) and \( E(Y_i) = \mu \), we have \( E(\bar{X}) = \mu \) and \( E(\bar{Y}) = \mu \). Thus, \( E(\hat{\mu}) = \delta \mu + (1-\delta) \mu = \mu \). This shows \( \hat{\mu} \) is an unbiased estimator.
03

Calculate the Variance of \( \hat{\mu} \)

The variance of \( \hat{\mu} \) is \( V(\hat{\mu}) = V(\delta \bar{X} + (1-\delta) \bar{Y}) = \delta^2 V(\bar{X}) + (1-\delta)^2 V(\bar{Y}) \). We use \( V(\bar{X}) = \frac{\sigma^2}{m} \) and \( V(\bar{Y}) = \frac{4\sigma^2}{n} \). Substitute these into the variance formula: \( V(\hat{\mu}) = \delta^2 \frac{\sigma^2}{m} + (1-\delta)^2 \frac{4\sigma^2}{n} \).
04

Differentiate \( V(\hat{\mu}) \) with respect to \( \delta \)

To minimize \( V(\hat{\mu}) = \delta^2 \frac{\sigma^2}{m} + (1-\delta)^2 \frac{4\sigma^2}{n} \), differentiate with respect to \( \delta \). We have \( \frac{d}{d\delta} V(\hat{\mu}) = 2\delta \frac{\sigma^2}{m} - 2(1-\delta) \frac{4\sigma^2}{n} \). Set this derivative to zero: \( 2\delta \frac{\sigma^2}{m} = 2(1-\delta) \frac{4\sigma^2}{n} \).
05

Solve for \( \delta \)

Simplify \( \frac{\delta}{m} = \frac{4(1-\delta)}{n} \). Clear fractions: \( n\delta = 4m - 4m\delta \). Rearrange to \( (n + 4m)\delta = 4m \). Thus, \( \delta = \frac{4m}{n + 4m} \).
06

Conclusion

The minimum variance of \( \hat{\mu} \) is obtained when \( \delta = \frac{4m}{n + 4m} \). Therefore, \( V(\hat{\mu}) \) is minimized for this \( \delta \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Estimator
An estimator is a statistical rule or formula that gives us an idea of an unknown parameter within a population based on sample data. In this example, we have the estimator \( \hat{\mu} = \delta \bar{X} + (1-\delta) \bar{Y} \). This estimator is attempting to estimate the true average growth, \( \mu \), of two types of plants.

To understand how the estimator works, we calculate its expected value, which is the average result it would produce over many samples. For the estimator \( \hat{\mu} \) to be unbiased, its expected value must equal the true parameter value, \( \mu \). The calculation here showed that \( E(\hat{\mu}) = \mu \), confirming that it's indeed unbiased. This is because the average of both observations, \( \bar{X} \) and \( \bar{Y} \), are themselves unbiased estimators of \( \mu \).
  • Estimation is crucial in statistics as it allows predictions based on sample data.
  • An unbiased estimator provides results centered on the true parameter on average.
Variance Minimization
To understand variance minimization of an estimator like \( \hat{\mu} \), consider that variance measures the spread or variability of an estimator. Lower variance leads to more precise estimates. For optimal estimation, you want an estimator that not only is unbiased but also has the smallest possible variance. This ensures that repeated estimates give consistently close results.

In this exercise, variance minimization was achieved by finding the right value of \( \delta \) that reduces the variance \( V(\hat{\mu}) \). We determined the variance expression: \[ V(\hat{\mu}) = \delta^2 \frac{\sigma^2}{m} + (1-\delta)^2 \frac{4\sigma^2}{n} \] By setting its derivative with respect to \( \delta \) to zero, we found the value \( \delta = \frac{4m}{n + 4m} \), which minimizes the variance.
  • Variance minimization improves the consistency of estimator predictions.
  • Calculating variances and derivatives allows one to optimize estimation.
Bias
Bias in the context of statistics refers to the systematic errors that cause estimations to deviate from the true parameter value. In other words, if an estimator consistently overestimates or underestimates the parameter across different samples, it is a biased estimator.

In this context, ensuring that \( \hat{\mu} \) is unbiased is crucial. It's calculated to confirm that the expectation of our estimator is precisely the true parameter \( \mu \). Hence, the estimator \( \hat{\mu} \) offers a reliable way to assess the central tendency of plant growth, as we're confident that any observations are a reflection of actual average behavior and not a result of systematic bias.
  • An unbiased estimator produces estimates that are on target, statistically.
  • Bias reduction is essential for improving the accuracy of statistical predictions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As an example of a situation in which several different statistics could reasonably be used to calculate a point estimate, consider a population of \(N\) invoices. Associated with each invoice is its "book value," the recorded amount of that invoice. Let \(T\) denote the total book value, a known amount. Some of these book values are erroneous. An audit will be carried out by randomly selecting \(n\) invoices and determining the audited (correct) value for each one. Suppose that the sample gives the following results (in dollars). Let $$ \begin{aligned} &\bar{Y}=\text { sample mean book value } \\ &\bar{X}=\text { sample mean audited value } \\ &\bar{D}=\text { sample mean error } \end{aligned} $$ Propose three different statistics for estimating the total audited (i.e., correct) value-one involving just \(N\) and \(\bar{X}\), \(\frac{\text { another involving } T, N \text {, and } \bar{D} \text {, and the last involving } T \text { and }}{}\) \(\bar{X} / \bar{Y}\). If \(N=5000\) and \(T=1,761,300\), calculate the three corresponding point estimates. (The article "Statistical Models and Analysis in Auditing," Statistical Science, 1989: 2-33). discusses properties of these estimators.)

The accompanying data on flexural strength (MPa) for concrete beams of a certain type was introduced in Example 1.2. \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrr}5.9 & 7.2 & 7.3 & 6.3 & 8.1 & 6.8 & 7.0 \\ 7.6 & 6.8 & 6.5 & 7.0 & 6.3 & 7.9 & 9.0 \\ 8.2 & 8.7 & 7.8 & 9.7 & 7.4 & 7.7 & 9.7 \\\ 7.8 & 7.7 & 11.6 & 11.3 & 11.8 & 10.7 & \end{array}\) a. Calculate a point estimate of the mean value of strength for the conceptual population of all beams manufactured in this fashion, and state which estimator you used. b. Calculate a point estimate of the strength value that separates the weakest \(50 \%\) of all such beams from the strongest \(50 \%\), and state which estimator you used. c. Calculate and interpret a point estimate of the population standard deviation \(\sigma\). Which estimator did you use? [Hint: \(\left.\sum x_{i}^{2}=1860.94 .\right]\) d. Calculate a point estimate of the proportion of all such beams whose flexural strength exceeds \(10 \mathrm{MPa}\). [Hint: Think of an observation as a "success" if it exceeds 10.] e. Calculate a point estimate of the population coefficient of variation \(\sigma / \mu\), and state which estimator you used.

Let \(X\) denote the proportion of allotted time that a randomly selected student spends working on a certain aptitude test. Suppose the pdf of \(X\) is $$ f(x ; \theta)=\left\\{\begin{array}{cl} (\theta+1) x^{\theta} & 0 \leq x \leq 1 \\ 0 & \text { otherwise } \end{array}\right. $$ where \(-1<\theta\). A random sample of ten students yields data \(x_{1}=.92, x_{2}=.79, x_{3}=.90, x_{4}=.65, x_{5}=.86, x_{6}=.47\), \(x_{7}=.73, x_{8}=.97, x_{9}=.94, x_{10}=.77\). a. Use the method of moments to obtain an estimator of \(\theta\), and then compute the estimate for this data. b. Obtain the maximum likelihood estimator of \(\theta\), and then compute the estimate for the given data.

The shear strength of each of ten test spot welds is determined, yielding the following data (psi): \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}392 & 376 & 401 & 367 & 389 & 362 & 409 & 415 & 358 & 375\end{array}\) a. Assuming that shear strength is normally distributed, estimate the true average shear strength and standard deviation of shear strength using the method of maximum likelihood. b. Again assuming a nomal distribution, estimate the strength value below which \(95 \%\) of all welds will have their strengths. [Hint: What is the 95 th percentile in terms of \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) ? Now use the invariance principle.]

A sample of \(n\) captured Pandemonium jet fighters results in serial numbers \(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, \ldots, x_{n}\). The CIA knows that the aircraft were numbered consecutively at the factory starting with \(\alpha\) and ending with \(\beta\), so that the total number of planes manufactured is \(\beta-\alpha+1\) (e.g., if \(\alpha=17\) and \(\beta=29\), then \(29-17+1=13\) planes having serial numbers 17 , \(18,19, \ldots, 28,29\) were manufactured). However, the CIA does not know the values of \(\alpha\) or \(\beta\). A CIA statistician suggests using the estimator \(\max \left(X_{j}\right)-\min \left(X_{j}\right)+1\) to estimate the total number of planes manufactured. a. If \(n=5, x_{1}=237, x_{2}=375, x_{3}=202, x_{4}=525\), and \(x_{5}=418\). what is the corresponding estimate? b. Under what conditions on the sample will the value of the estimate be exactly equal to the true total number of planes? Will the estimate ever be larger than the true total? Do you think the estimator is unbiased for estimating \(\beta-\alpha+1\) ? Explain in one or two sentences.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.