/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 45 Suppose the \(x_{i j}\) s are "c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose the \(x_{i j}\) s are "coded" by \(y_{i j}=c x_{i j}+d\). How does the value of the \(F\) statistic computed from the \(y_{i j}\) s compare to the value computed from the \(x_{i j} \mathrm{~s}\) ? Justify your assertion.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The F-statistic remains unchanged by the coding.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Coding Effects on Variance

When we code by a linear transformation, such as \(y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d\), the variance components are affected by the coding factor \(c\), but not by the additive constant \(d\). Specifically, for any set of elements, we have the result that \(\text{Var}(y) = c^2 \cdot \text{Var}(x)\). This means that only the scaling factor \(c\) impacts the variance.
02

Analyze the Effect on the F-statistic

The F-statistic is computed using the ratio of two variances: the mean square between groups (MSB) and the mean square within groups (MSW). Under the linear transformation, both MSB and MSW are multiplied by \(c^2\), so the transformed quantities are \(\text{MSB}_y = c^2 \cdot \text{MSB}_x\) and \(\text{MSW}_y = c^2 \cdot \text{MSW}_x\).
03

Calculate the New F-statistic

The F-statistic is given by the formula \(F = \frac{\text{MSB}}{\text{MSW}}\). Therefore, the transformed F-statistic using \(y_{ij}\) is:\[F_y = \frac{c^2 \cdot \text{MSB}_x}{c^2 \cdot \text{MSW}_x} = \frac{\text{MSB}_x}{\text{MSW}_x}\]This shows that the factor of \(c^2\) cancels out, and thus the F-statistic remains unchanged.
04

Conclusions and Implications

The F-statistic is independent of the coding constants \(c\) and \(d\). Therefore, regardless of the transformation applied to the original data by the constants \(c\) and \(d\), the F-statistic computed remains the same. This invariance is important for statistical consistency when interpreting the F-test results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Transformation
A linear transformation is a crucial concept in statistics and involves manipulating data using the formula \( y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d \). This means that each data point \( x_{ij} \) is scaled by a constant \( c \) and shifted by a constant \( d \). These transformations are useful for adjusting data scales without distorting the relationship between data points.
Linear transformations keep the relative structures of data intact while allowing modifications to the scale and position of data values.
For example, multiplying all exam scores by 1.1 (scaling) and adding 5 (shifting) is a linear transformation.
  • The scaling factor \( c \) affects the data by stretching or shrinking it.
  • The shifting factor \( d \) modifies the position of the entire dataset.
Understanding how these transformations affect statistical measures is essential, particularly when dealing with measures like variance.
Variance
Variance is a statistical measure indicating how much numbers in a dataset differ from their mean. It is key to understanding how spread out the data is. When a dataset undergoes a linear transformation, variance changes predictably in response to the multiplication factor \( c \).

The variance of transformed data \( y_{ij} \) is calculated as \( \text{Var}(y) = c^2 \cdot \text{Var}(x) \), where \( x \) is the original data. Here, the variance is affected by the square of the scaling factor \( c \), meaning:

  • When \( c > 1 \), the variance increases, suggesting greater spread among the transformed values.
  • When \( 0 < c < 1 \), the variance decreases, suggesting less spread among values.
  • The additive constant \( d \) does not affect the variance, as it uniformly shifts data without altering their relative displacement.
Therefore, understanding the variance of transformed data is crucial when comparing datasets and assessing their spread consistency.
Mean Square Between Groups
The Mean Square Between Groups (MSB) is a measure used in ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) that quantifies the variation among the means of different groups. It gives an idea of how much the group means vary from the overall mean across all data.

In the context of a linear transformation given by \( y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d \), the MSB is affected similarly to variance. It is scaled by \( c^2 \), such that \( \text{MSB}_y = c^2 \cdot \text{MSB}_x \).
Simply put:
  • MSB illustrates the variance between different group means.
  • The scaling impact \( c^2 \) shows how the spread between these groups changes.
This transformation property helps maintain the statistical importance of the MSB when datasets are linearly transformed.
Mean Square Within Groups
Mean Square Within Groups (MSW) reflects the variation within individual groups in ANOVA. It focuses on differences among data points in the same group. Like the MSB, the MSW is also affected by linear transformations.

For a transformation given by \( y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d \), the MSW becomes \( \text{MSW}_y = c^2 \cdot \text{MSW}_x \). This scaling adjustment is key:
  • MSW is crucial for identifying within-group variability.
  • The factor \( c^2 \) changes how we perceive this variability in transformed data.
Understanding the impact on both MSB and MSW ensures that the inherent statistical characteristics of data remain consistent, even after linear transformations.
Statistical Consistency
Statistical consistency is a significant statistical property ensuring that as more data becomes available, estimates become more accurate and stable. In the context of the F-statistic, statistical consistency refers to its reliability under transformations.

The F-statistic is calculated as the ratio of MSB to MSW. Given the linear transformation properties, where both MSB and MSW are multiplied by \( c^2 \), the F-statistic remains unaffected. This is because \( F_y = \frac{c^2 \cdot \text{MSB}_x}{c^2 \cdot \text{MSW}_x} \) simplifies to \( F_x = \frac{\text{MSB}_x}{\text{MSW}_x} \).
This invariance signifies:
  • No matter the transformation applied, the F-statistic provides a stable measure of variance between groups.
  • It assures researchers of consistent results across transformed datasets.
Such consistency makes the F-statistic a robust tool in statistical analysis, ensuring valid conclusions regardless of data transformations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Four laboratories \((1-4)\) are randomly selected from a large population, and each is asked to make three determinations of the percentage of methyl alcohol in specimens of a compound taken from a single batch. Based on the accompanying data, are differences among laboratories a source of variation in the percentage of methyl alcohol? State and test the relevant hypotheses using significance level \(.05\). $$ \begin{array}{llll} 1: & 85.06 & 85.25 & 84.87 \\ 2: & 84.99 & 84.28 & 84.88 \\ 3: & 84.48 & 84.72 & 85.10 \\ 4: & 84.10 & 84.55 & 84.05 \end{array} $$

Numerous factors contribute to the smooth running of an electric motor ("Increasing Market Share Through Improved Product and Process Design: An Experimental Approach," Quality Engineering, 1991: 361-369). In particular, it is desirable to keep motor noise and vibration to a minimum. To study the effect that the brand of bearing has on motor vibration, five different motor bearing brands were examined by installing each type of bearing on different random samples of six motors. The amount of motor vibration (measured in microns) was recorded when each of the 30 motors was running. The data for this study follows. State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level \(.05\), and then carry out a multiple comparisons analysis if appropriate. $$ \begin{array}{llllllll} \text { Brand 1 } & 13.1 & 15.0 & 14.0 & 14.4 & 14.0 & 11.6 & 13.68 \\ \text { Brand 2 } & 16.3 & 15.7 & 17.2 & 14.9 & 14.4 & 17.2 & 15.95 \\ \text { Brand 3 } & 13.7 & 13.9 & 12.4 & 13.8 & 14.9 & 13.3 & 13.67 \\ \text { Brand 4 } & 15.7 & 13.7 & 14.4 & 16.0 & 13.9 & 14.7 & 14.73 \\ \text { Brand 5 } & 13.5 & 13.4 & 13.2 & 12.7 & 13.4 & 12.3 & 13.08 \end{array} $$

When sample sizes are equal \(\left(J_{i}=J\right)\), the parameters \(\alpha_{1}, \alpha_{2}, \ldots, \alpha_{l}\) of the alternative parameterization are restricted by \(\sum \alpha_{i}=0\). For unequal sample sizes, the most natural restriction is \(\sum J_{i} \alpha_{i}=0\). Use this to show that $$ E(\mathrm{MSTr})=\sigma^{2}+\frac{1}{I-1} \sum J_{i} \alpha_{i}^{2} $$ What is \(E\) (MSTr) when \(H_{0}\) is true? [This expectation is correct if \(\sum J_{i} \alpha_{i}=0\) is replaced by the restriction \(\sum \alpha_{i}=0\) (or any other single linear restriction on the \(\alpha_{i}\) s used to reduce the model to \(I\) independent parameters), but \(\sum J_{i} \alpha_{i}=0\) simplifies the algebra and yields natural estimates for the model parameters (in particular, \(\hat{\alpha}_{i}=\bar{x}_{i \cdot}-\bar{x}_{. .}\)).]

In an experiment to compare the quality of four different brands of reel-to- reel recording tape, five 2400 -ft reels of each brand (A-D) were selected and the number of flaws in each reel was determined. A: \(\begin{array}{lllll}10 & 5 & 12 & 14 & 8\end{array}\) B: \(\begin{array}{lllll}14 & 12 & 17 & 9 & 8\end{array}\) C: \(\begin{array}{lllll}13 & 18 & 10 & 15 & 18\end{array}\) D: \(\begin{array}{lllll}17 & 16 & 12 & 22 & 14\end{array}\) It is believed that the number of flaws has approximately a Poisson distribution for each brand. Analyze the data at level \(.01\) to see whether the expected number of flaws per reel is the same for each brand.

In single-factor ANOVA with \(I\) treatments and \(J\) observations per treatment, let \(\mu=(1 / I) \sum \mu_{i}\). a. Express \(E\left(\bar{X}_{\underline{.}}\right)\) in terms of \(\mu\). [Hint: \(\bar{X}_{. .}=(1 / I) \sum \bar{X}_{i \cdot}\) ] b. Compute \(E\left(\bar{X}_{i .}^{2}\right)\). [Hint: For any rv \(Y, E\left(Y^{2}\right)=V(Y)+\) \(\left.[E(Y)]^{2} .\right]\) c. Compute \(E\left(\bar{X}_{. .}^{2}\right)\). d. Compute \(E(\mathrm{SSTr})\) and then show that $$ E(\mathrm{MSTr})=\sigma^{2}+\frac{J}{I-1} \sum\left(\mu_{i}-\mu\right)^{2} $$ e. Using the result of part (d), what is E(MSTr) when \(H_{0}\) is true? When \(H_{0}\) is false, how does \(E(\mathrm{MSTr})\) compare to \(\sigma^{2} ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.