/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 Temperature transducers of a cer... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Temperature transducers of a certain type are shipped in batches of 50 . A sample of 60 batches was selected, and the number of transducers in each batch not conforming to design specifications was determined, resulting in the following data: \(\begin{array}{llllllllllllllllllll}2 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 0 & 1 & 3 & 2 & 0 & 5 & 3 & 3 & 1 & 3 & 2 & 4 & 7 & 0 & 2 & 3 \\ 0 & 4 & 2 & 1 & 3 & 1 & 1 & 3 & 4 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 2 & 2 & 8 & 4 & 5 & 1 & 3 & 1 \\ 5 & 0 & 2 & 3 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 4 & 2 & 1 & 6 & 0 & 3 & 3 & 3 & 6 & 1 & 2 & 3\end{array}\) a. Determine frequencies and relative frequencies for the observed values of \(x=\) number of nonconforming transducers in a batch. b. What proportion of batches in the sample have at most five nonconforming transducers? What proportion have fewer than five? What proportion have at least five nonconforming units? c. Draw a histogram of the data using relative frequency on the vertical scale, and comment on its features.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Frequencies calculated, relative frequencies found, proportions determined, histogram created.

Step by step solution

01

Tally Frequencies for Each x Value

First, list all the possible values of \(x\), which is the number of nonconforming transducers in a batch. Then, count how many times each \(x\) value appears in the data set. The possible \(x\) values from the data are 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. For example, \(x = 2\) appears 12 times in the data.
02

Calculate Relative Frequencies

For each \(x\) value, divide its frequency by the total number of batches (60) to find the relative frequency. For example, if \(x = 2\) has a frequency of 12, then its relative frequency is \( \frac{12}{60} = 0.20 \). Repeat this for each \(x\) value.
03

Calculate Proportions for Comparison

Identify the number of batches with at most five nonconforming transducers, those with fewer than five, and those with at least five. Sum the frequencies of \(x\) values 0 through 5 for at most 5, 0 through 4 for fewer than 5, and 5 through 8 for at least 5. Divide each by the total (60) to find each proportion.
04

Create a Histogram

On the x-axis, plot the number of nonconforming transducers, and on the y-axis, plot the relative frequencies. For each \(x\) value, draw a bar representing its relative frequency. This histogram provides a visual representation of the distribution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Frequency Distribution
In data analysis, understanding how data points are distributed is crucial. The frequency distribution is one way to achieve this. It involves counting how often each distinct data point, or category, appears in a dataset.
In our example of temperature transducers, each batch is counted for how many nonconforming transducers it contains. From the data provided, we create a list of all possible outcomes, which are the numbers 0 through 8, representing the count of nonconforming transducers in each batch.
To create a frequency distribution, we tally how many batches fall into each category. This gives us a quick snapshot of where most data points lie, showing us trends or patterns. Frequency distribution is foundational to recognize data patterns.
Histogram
A histogram is a type of bar chart that represents the frequency distribution of a dataset visually. It’s an excellent tool to quickly convey how the data is spread across different categories.
In our exercise, once we have the relative frequencies calculated, we use them to plot a histogram.
The x-axis will represent the number of nonconforming transducers in each batch, ranging from 0 to 8, while the y-axis will show the relative frequency of each of these numbers, indicating the proportion of each within the sample of batches.
Each bar’s height in the histogram corresponds to the relative frequency of that category. By examining the heights, we can see which outcomes occur more frequently. In the data about temperature transducers, the histogram lets us see at a glance which categories of nonconforming items occur most often, providing insight into potential quality control issues.
Proportions
Understanding proportions in datasets allows us to comprehend segments of the data concerning the whole.
In the temperature transducer context, once we have determined frequency, we can calculate proportions to answer specific questions. For example, we might want to know what fraction of batches had five or fewer nonconforming transducers.
Here we sum the number of batches in this category and divide by the total number of batches, obtaining a fraction or proportion. This helps in determining compliance or quality issues across batches.
Proportions offer a relative measure of frequency, assisting us in making comparisons and interpreting the data in line with specifications or standards.
Data Analysis
Data analysis involves examining, cleaning, and modeling data with the aim of discovering useful information, informing conclusions, and supporting decision-making.
It starts with collecting data and understanding its structure—a process exemplified by our frequency distribution and histogram.
The next step involves summarizing this information through calculations like means, medians, and our focus here, the proportions.
For our temperature transducers, we identified issues through the number of nonconformities—steps like tallying, calculating frequencies, and visualizing them in a histogram facilitate deeper understanding.
Through detailed data analysis, we find significant patterns or anomalies that inform the quality and standards of the batches, driving better production processes and decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following data on type of health complaint \((\mathrm{J}=\) joint swelling, \(\mathrm{F}=\) fatigue, \(\mathrm{B}=\) back pain, \(\mathrm{M}=\) muscle weakness, \(\mathrm{C}=\) coughing, \(\mathrm{N}=\) nose running/irritation, \(\mathrm{O}=\) other) made by tree planters. Obtain frequencies and relative frequencies for the various categories, and draw a histogram. (The data is consistent with percentages given in the article "Physiological Effects of Work Stress and Pesticide Exposure in Tree Planting by British Columbia Silviculture Workers"" Ergonomics, 1993: 951–961.) $$ \begin{array}{llllllllllllll} \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{N} & \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{C} & \mathrm{F} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{F} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{M} \\ \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{F} & \mathrm{F} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{N} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{N} & \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{F} & \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{C} \\ \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{F} & \mathrm{N} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{M} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{M} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{B} \\ \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{F} & \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{N} & \mathrm{C} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{M} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{F} \\ \mathrm{J} & \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{F} & \mathrm{N} & & & & & & & & & & \end{array} $$

Blood cocaine concentration (mg/L) was determined both for a sample of individuals who had died from cocaineinduced excited delirium (ED) and for a sample of those who had died from a cocaine overdose without excited delirium; survival time for people in both groups was at most 6 hours. The accompanying data was read from a comparative boxplot in the article "Fatal Excited Delirium Following Cocaine Use" (J. of Forensic Sciences, 1997: 25-31). $$ \begin{array}{lllllllllllll} \text { ED } & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & .1 & .1 & .1 & .1 & .2 & .2 & .3 & .3 \\ & .3 & .4 & .5 & .7 & .8 & 1.0 & 1.5 & 2.7 & 2.8 \\ \text { Non-ED } & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & .1 & .1 & .1 & .1 & .2 & .2 & .2 \\ & .3 & .3 & .3 & .4 & .5 & .5 & .6 & .8 & .9 & 1.0 \\ & 1.2 & 1.4 & 1.5 & 1.7 & 2.0 & 3.2 & 3.5 & 4.1 \\ & 4.3 & 4.8 & 5.0 & 5.6 & 5.9 & 6.0 & 6.4 & 7.9 \\ & 8.3 & 8.7 & 9.1 & 9.6 & 9.9 & 11.0 & 11.5 \\ & 12.2 & 12.7 & 14.0 & 16.6 & 17.8 & \end{array} $$ a. Determine the medians, fourths, and fourth spreads for the two samples. b. Are there any outliers in either sample? Any extreme outliers? c. Construct a comparative boxplot, and use it as a basis for comparing and contrasting the ED and non-ED samples.

A transformation of data values by means of some mathematical function, such as \(\sqrt{x}\) or \(1 / x\), can often yield a set of numbers that has "nicer" statistical properties than the original data. In particular, it may be possible to find a function for which the histogram of transformed values is more symmetric (or, even better, more like a bell-shaped curve) than the original data. As an example, the article "Time Lapse Cinematographic Analysis of BerylliumLung Fibroblast Interactions" (Environ. Research, 1983: 34-43) reported the results of experiments designed to study the behavior of certain individual cells that had been exposed to beryllium. An important characteristic of such an individual cell is its interdivision time (IDT). IDTs were determined for a large number of cells both in exposed (treatment) and unexposed (control) conditions. The authors of the article used a logarithmic transformation, that is, transformed value \(=\log\) (original value). Consider the following representative IDT data: $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \hline \text { IDT } & \log _{10}(\text { IDT }) & \text { IDT } & \log _{10}(\text { IDT }) & \text { IDT } & \log _{10}(\text { IDT }) \\ \hline 28.1 & 1.45 & 60.1 & 1.78 & 21.0 & 1.32 \\ 31.2 & 1.49 & 23.7 & 1.37 & 22.3 & 1.35 \\ 13.7 & 1.14 & 18.6 & 1.27 & 15.5 & 1.19 \\ 46.0 & 1.66 & 21.4 & 1.33 & 36.3 & 1.56 \\ 25.8 & 1.41 & 26.6 & 1.42 & 19.1 & 1.28 \\ 16.8 & 1.23 & 26.2 & 1.42 & 38.4 & 1.58 \\ 34.8 & 1.54 & 32.0 & 1.51 & 72.8 & 1.86 \\ 62.3 & 1.79 & 43.5 & 1.64 & 48.9 & 1.69 \\ 28.0 & 1.45 & 17.4 & 1.24 & 21.4 & 1.33 \\ 17.9 & 1.25 & 38.8 & 1.59 & 20.7 & 1.32 \\ 19.5 & 1.29 & 30.6 & 1.49 & 57.3 & 1.76 \\ 21.1 & 1.32 & 55.6 & 1.75 & 40.9 & 1.61 \\ 31.9 & 1.50 & 25.5 & 1.41 & & \\ 28.9 & 1.46 & 52.1 & 1.72 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Use class intervals \(10-<20,20-<30, \ldots\) to construct a histogram of the original data. Use intervals \(1.1-<1.2\), \(1.2-<1.3, \ldots\) to do the same for the transformed data. What is the effect of the transformation?

Specimens of three different types of rope wire were selected, and the fatigue limit (MPa) was determined for each specimen, resulting in the accompanying data. \(\begin{array}{lllllllll}\text { Type 1 } & 350 & 350 & 350 & 358 & 370 & 370 & 370 & 371 \\ & 371 & 372 & 372 & 384 & 391 & 391 & 392 & \\ \text { Type 2 } & 350 & 354 & 359 & 363 & 365 & 368 & 369 & 371 \\ & 373 & 374 & 376 & 380 & 383 & 388 & 392 & \\ \text { Type 3 } & 350 & 361 & 362 & 364 & 364 & 365 & 366 & 371 \\ & 377 & 377 & 377 & 379 & 380 & 380 & 392 & \end{array}\) a. Construct a comparative boxplot, and comment on similarities and differences. b. Construct a comparative dotplot (a dotplot for each sample with a common scale). Comment on similarities and differences. c. Does the comparative boxplot of part (a) give an informative assessment of similarities and differences? Explain your reasoning.

In a study of author productivity ("Lotka's Test," Collection Mgmt., 1982: 111-118), a large number of authors were classified according to the number of articles they had published during a certain period. The results were presented in the accompanying frequency distribution: $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { Number }\\\ &\begin{array}{lrrrrrrrrr} \text { of papers } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & \\ \text { Frequency } & 784 & 204 & 127 & 50 & 33 & 28 & 19 & 19 & \\ \text { Number } & & & & & & & & & \\ \text { of papers } & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & 14 & 15 & 16 & 17 \\ \text { Frequency } & 6 & 7 & 6 & 7 & 4 & 4 & 5 & 3 & 3 \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ a. Construct a histogram corresponding to this frequency distribution. What is the most interesting feature of the shape of the distribution? b. What proportion of these authors published at least five papers? At least ten papers? More than ten papers? c. Suppose the five \(15 \mathrm{~s}\), three \(16 \mathrm{~s}\), and three \(17 \mathrm{~s}\) had been lumped into a single category displayed as " \(\geq 15\)." Would you be able to draw a histogram? Explain. d. Suppose that instead of the values 15,16 , and 17 being listed separately, they had been combined into a 15-17 category with frequency 11 . Would you be able to draw a histogram? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.