/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 The article "'The Effects of a L... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "'The Effects of a Low-Fat, Plant-Based Dietary Intervention on Body Weight, Metabolism, and Insulin Sensitivity in Postmenopausal Women" (Amer. J. of Med., 2005: 991-997) reported on the results of an experiment in which half of the individuals in a group of 64 postmenopausal overweight women were randomly assigned to a particular vegan diet, and the other half received a diet based on National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. The sample mean decrease in body weight for those on the vegan diet was \(5.8 \mathrm{~kg}\), and the sample SD was 3.2, whereas for those on the control diet, the sample mean weight loss and standard deviation were \(3.8\) and \(2.8\), respectively. Does it appear the true average weight loss for the vegan diet exceeds that for the control diet by more than \(1 \mathrm{~kg}\) ? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses at significance level \(.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Fail to reject the null hypothesis; insufficient evidence for a greater than 1 kg difference.

Step by step solution

01

Set Up Hypotheses

To determine if the true mean weight loss for the vegan diet exceeds the control diet by more than 1 kg, we first set up the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis is \( H_0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \leq 1 \), and the alternative hypothesis is \( H_a: \mu_1 - \mu_2 > 1 \) where \( \mu_1 \) is the mean weight loss for the vegan diet, and \( \mu_2 \) is the mean weight loss for the control diet.
02

Calculate Sample Mean Difference and Standard Error

Calculate the observed difference in sample means: \( \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 = 5.8 - 3.8 = 2.0 \) kg. Next, calculate the standard error (SE) for the difference of sample means: \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}} = \sqrt{\frac{3.2^2}{32} + \frac{2.8^2}{32}} \approx 0.825 \]
03

Find Test Statistic

Using the sample mean difference and SE calculated, compute the test statistic \( t \): \[ t = \frac{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - 1}{SE} = \frac{2.0 - 1}{0.825} \approx 1.212 \]
04

Determine Critical Value or P-value

The test involves a t-distribution with \( n_1 + n_2 - 2 = 64 - 2 = 62 \) degrees of freedom. At a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.05 \), using a t-table or calculator, we find the critical t-value for a one-tailed test is approximately 1.670 (for 62 degrees of freedom). Or compute the p-value.
05

Make Decision

Since our test statistic (1.212) is less than the critical t-value (1.670), or the p-value is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
06

Conclusion

There is not enough statistical evidence to conclude that the true average weight loss for the vegan diet exceeds that for the control diet by more than 1 kg at the 0.05 significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

t-test
The t-test is a statistical test used to compare the means of two groups. In the context of the exercise, it helps determine if the average weight loss among women on the vegan diet is significantly greater than that on the control diet.
The t-test specifically checks if the observed difference in sample means is unlikely to have occurred due to chance alone. Here, the sample mean difference of weights between the two diets is compared to an expected difference set by the null hypothesis (e.g., 1 kg difference).
  • The t-test assumes that the data is normally distributed and that the variances of the two samples are equal.
  • It's appropriate for small to medium sample sizes, which applies in this experiment with 32 participants per group.
The test calculates a t-statistic, which indicates how far the observed data is from the expected mean difference under the null hypothesis in terms of standard error units. This value is then used to determine whether we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
significance level
The significance level, denoted by \( \alpha \), is a threshold that researchers set to decide when to reject the null hypothesis. In this exercise, a significance level of 0.05 is used. This means there is a 5% risk of concluding that there is a true difference in mean weight loss between the two diets when there actually isn't.
A lower significance level means more rigorous criteria for rejecting the null hypothesis, reducing the likelihood of false positives.
  • The choice of \(\alpha = 0.05\) is a standard in many scientific fields, balancing false positive risk and sensitivity of the test.
  • It essentially indicates our tolerance for a Type I error, which occurs when we incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis.
In our context, since the calculated test statistic doesn’t surpass the critical value, the conclusion is to "fail to reject" the null hypothesis, as weight loss difference isn't significant enough based on the set threshold.
sample mean difference
The sample mean difference is the observed difference between the average results of the two sample groups. In this case, it's the difference in average weight loss between women on a vegan diet and those on the control diet.
The calculated mean difference is 2.0 kg, which is obtained by subtracting the average weight loss of the control group (3.8 kg) from that of the vegan diet group (5.8 kg).
  • This number tells us how much more weight, on average, the vegan diet group lost compared to the control group.
  • It serves as the primary statistic of interest in deciding whether there is a significant difference in outcomes between the diet groups.
However, in hypothesis testing, this observed difference has to be evaluated in the context of variability (captured by the standard error) to test its statistical significance.
standard error
The standard error (SE) measures the accuracy with which a sample represents a population. It is particularly crucial in hypothesis testing because it reflects the sampling variability of the sample mean difference.
In this example, the standard error for the difference of sample means is calculated to be approximately 0.825.
This is obtained using the standard deviations and sample sizes of both groups:
\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{3.2^2}{32} + \frac{2.8^2}{32}} \approx 0.825 \]
  • Lower SE suggests that the sample mean difference is more reliable as an estimate of the true population mean difference.
  • The SE provides the denominator in the formula for the t-statistic, which indicates how much the sample mean difference deviates from the expected mean difference under the null hypothesis.
The smaller the SE, the more confident one can be that the sample mean difference is an accurate reflection of the true difference in the population means.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Reliance on solid biomass fuel for cooking and heating exposes many children from developing countries to high levels of indoor air pollution. The article "Domestic Fuels, Indoor Air Pollution, and Children's Health" (Annals of the N.Y. Academy of Sciences, 2008: 209-217) presented information on various pulmonary characteristics in samples of children whose households in India used either biomass fuel or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). For the 755 children in biomass households, the sample mean peak expiratory flow (a person's maximum speed of expiration) was \(3.30 \mathrm{~L} / \mathrm{s}\), and the sample standard deviation was \(1.20\). For the 750 children whose households used liquefied petroleum gas, the sample mean PEF was \(4.25\) and the sample standard deviation was 1.75. a. Calculate a confidence interval at the \(95 \%\) confidence level for the population mean PEF for children in biomass households and then do likewise for children in LPG households. What is the simultaneous confidence level for the two intervals? b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether true average PEF is lower for children in biomass households than it is for children in LPG households (the cited article included a \(P\)-value for this test). c. \(\mathrm{FEV}_{1}\), the forced expiratory volume in 1 second, is another measure of pulmonary function. The cited article reported that for the biomass households the sample mean \(\mathrm{FEV}_{1}\) was \(2.3 \mathrm{~L} / \mathrm{s}\) and the sample standard deviation was \(.5 \mathrm{~L} / \mathrm{s}\). If this information is used to compute a \(95 \%\) CI for population mean \(\mathrm{FEV}_{1}\), would the simultaneous confidence level for this interval and the first interval calculated in (a) be the same as the simultaneous confidence level determined there? Explain.

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric condition leading to substantial weight loss among women who are fearful of becoming fat. The article "4dipose Tissue Distribution After Weight Restoration and Weight Maintenance in Women with Anorexia Nervosa" (Amer. \(J\). of Clinical Nutr., 2009: 1132-1137) used whole- body magnetic resonance imagery to determine various tissue characteristics for both an AN sample of individuals who had undergone acute weight restoration and maintained their weight for a year and a comparable (at the outset of the study) control sample. Here is summary data on intermuscular adipose tissue (IAT; kg). \begin{tabular}{lccc} Condition & Sample Size & Sample Mean & Sample SD \\ \hline AN & 16 & \(.52\) & \(.26\) \\ Control & 8 & \(.35\) & \(.15\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Assume that both samples were selected from normal distributions. a. Calculate an estimate for true average IAT under the described AN protocol, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation. b. Calculate an estimate for the difference between true average AN IAT and true average control IAT, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation. What does your estimate suggest about true average AN IAT relative to true average control IAT?

The article "Quantitative MRI and Electrophysiology of Preoperative Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in a Female Population" (Ergonomies, 1997: 642-649) reported that \((-473.13,1691.9)\) was a large-sample \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between true average thenar muscle volume \(\left(\mathrm{mm}^{3}\right)\) for sufferers of carpal tunnel syndrome and true average volume for nonsufferers. Calculate and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for this difference.

The following observations are on time (h) for a AA 1.5volt alkaline battery to reach a \(0.8\) voltage ("Comparing the Lifetimes of Two Brands of Batteries," \(J\). of Statistical Educ., 2013, online): \(\begin{array}{llllll}\text { Energizer: } & 8.65 & 8.74 & 8.91 & 8.72 & 8.85 \\\ \text { Ultracell: } & 8.76 & 8.81 & 8.81 & 8.70 & 8.73 \\ \text { Energizer: } & 8.52 & 8.62 & 8.68 & 8.86 & \\ \text { Ultracell: } & 8.76 & 8.68 & 8.64 & 8.79 & \end{array}\) Normal probability plots support the assumption that the population distributions are normal. Does the data suggest that the variance of the Energizer population distribution differs from that of the Ultracell population distribution? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). [Note: The two-sample \(t\) test for equality of population means gives a \(P\)-value of .763.] The Energizer batteries are much more expensive than the Ultracell batteries. Would you pay the extra money?

Teen Court is a juvenile diversion program designed to circumvent the formal processing of first-time juvenile offenders within the juvenile justice system. The article "An Experimental Evaluation of Teen Courts" \((J\). of Experimental Criminology, 2008: 137-163) reported on a study in which offenders were randomly assigned either to Teen Court or to the traditional Department of Juvenile Services method of processing. Of the \(56 \mathrm{TC}\) individuals, 18 subsequently recidivated (look it up!) during the 18 -month follow-up period, whereas 12 of the 51 DJS individuals did so. Does the data suggest that the true proportion of TC individuals who recidivate during the specified follow-up period differs from the proportion of DJS individuals who do so? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of . 10 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.