/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 55 Consider carrying out \(m\) test... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider carrying out \(m\) tests of hypotheses based on independent samples, each at significance level (exactly) .01. a. What is the probability of committing at least one type I error when \(m=5\) ? When \(m=10\) ? b. How many such tests would it take for the probability of committing at least one type I error to be at least . 5 ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Probability for m=5 is 0.049; for m=10 is 0.096. b) At least 70 tests are needed for a probability of at least 0.5.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the probability of Type I error for one test

The probability of committing a Type I error in a single hypothesis test is the significance level, which is given as 0.01. This means there is a 1% chance of a Type I error for each test.
02

Calculate the probability of not committing a Type I error in one test

To find the probability of not committing a Type I error in one single test, subtract the probability of making an error from 1. \[P(\text{No Type I error}) = 1 - 0.01 = 0.99\]
03

Calculate the probability of not committing a Type I error in all tests

For independent tests, the probability of not making a Type I error in all tests is the product of the probabilities of not making an error in each test. If there are \( m \) tests:\[P(\text{No Type I errors in } m \text{ tests}) = 0.99^m\]
04

Calculate the probability of at least one Type I error

The probability of committing at least one Type I error in \( m \) tests is the complementary probability of Step 3:\[P(\text{At least one Type I error}) = 1 - 0.99^m\]
05

Calculate for m=5 and m=10

Substitute \( m = 5 \) and \( m = 10 \) into the equation from Step 4:\[P(\text{At least one error, } m=5) = 1 - 0.99^5 \approx 0.049\]\[P(\text{At least one error, } m=10) = 1 - 0.99^{10} \approx 0.096\]
06

Determine the number of tests for probability of at least 0.5

Find the minimum \( m \) such that the probability calculated in Step 4 is at least 0.5 by solving the equation:\[1 - 0.99^m = 0.5\]\[0.99^m = 0.5\]Take the natural logarithm of both sides:\[m \ln(0.99) = \ln(0.5)\]Solve for \( m \):\[ m = \frac{\ln(0.5)}{\ln(0.99)} \approx 69.66\]Since the number of tests must be a whole number, round up to get \( m = 70 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental method used in statistics to determine whether there is enough evidence to reject a null hypothesis (often denoted as \( H_0 \)). The null hypothesis is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. For example, you might hypothesize that a new medication is no more effective than a placebo. The process involves collecting data and then using that data to determine the likelihood of observing such results if the null hypothesis is true. If this likelihood, or p-value, is low enough, you may decide to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the observed effect is significant.The opposite of the null hypothesis is the alternative hypothesis (often denoted as \( H_a \)), which is what you would conclude if you reject \( H_0 \). This method helps in determining the real-world applicability and validity of your hypothesis, providing a structured approach to decision-making in the realm of statistics.Some points to consider:- Hypothesis testing helps in analyzing whether results are due to chance.- It involves calculating probabilities and comparing them to a predefined significance level.- The outcome can either lead to rejecting \( H_0 \) or not having enough evidence to reject it, but never accepting \( H_0 \) outright.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by \( \alpha \), is a crucial concept in hypothesis testing. It defines the threshold at which you accept or reject the null hypothesis. This threshold represents the probability of making a Type I error, which occurs when you incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis. For example, if a significance level is set at 0.01, this indicates a 1% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none, meaning your results could wrongly indicate an effect or difference. The choice of significance level impacts the rigor and reliability of the test results, and a lower significance level indicates stricter criteria for rejecting \( H_0 \).It's important to:- Choose the significance level before conducting the test to avoid bias.- Understand that a lower \( \alpha \) reduces the chance of Type I errors, but increases the chance of Type II errors (failing to detect a true effect).- Commonly used significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10.
Probability Calculation
Probability calculations are integral to hypothesis testing, especially when assessing the likelihood of Type I errors across multiple tests. The probability of a Type I error for a single test is equal to the significance level \( \alpha \). When dealing with multiple tests, the probability of committing at least one Type I error is greater than \( \alpha \). This is because each test increases the chance, as errors tend to accumulate. To calculate this probability for multiple tests:- Calculate the probability of not making an error in one test as \( 1 - \alpha \).- For \( m \) independent tests, the probability of not making any errors is \( (1 - \alpha)^m \).- Consequently, the probability of at least one Type I error in \( m \) tests equals \( 1 - (1 - \alpha)^m \).For example, if you conduct 5 tests with \( \alpha = 0.01 \), the probability of at least one Type I error is computed as \( 1 - 0.99^5 \). The same principle applies when solving for different values of \( m \), such as 10 tests or determining the number of tests needed for a specific probability threshold.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Water samples are taken from water used for cooling as it is being discharged from a power plant into a river. It has been determined that as long as the mean temperature of the discharged water is at most \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), there will be no negative effects on the river's ecosystem. To investigate whether the plant is in compliance with regulations that prohibit a mean discharge water temperature above \(150^{\circ}\), 50 water samples will be taken at randomly selected times and the temperature of each sample recorded. The resulting data will be used to test the hypotheses \(H_{0}: \mu=150^{\circ}\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu>150^{\circ}\). In the context of this situation, describe type I and type II errors. Which type of error would you consider more serious? Explain.

A common characterization of obese individuals is that their body mass index is at least 30 [BMI \(=\) weight/(height) \({ }^{2}\), where height is in meters and weight is in kilograms]. The article "The Impact of Obesity on Illness Absence and Productivity in an Industrial Population of Petrochemical Workers" (Annals of Epidemiology, 2008: 8-14) reported that in a sample of female workers, 262 had BMIs of less than 25,159 had BMIs that were at least 25 but less than 30 , and 120 had BMIs exceeding 30 . Is there compelling evidence for concluding that more than \(20 \%\) of the individuals in the sampled population are obese? a. State and test appropriate hypotheses with a significance level of .05. b. Explain in the context of this scenario what constitutes type I and II errors. c. What is the probability of not concluding that more than \(20 \%\) of the population is obese when the actual percentage of obese individuals is \(25 \%\) ?

A sample of \(n\) sludge specimens is selected and the \(\mathrm{pH}\) of each one is determined. The one-sample \(t\) test will then be used to see if there is compelling evidence for concluding that true average \(\mathrm{pH}\) is less than 7.0. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations? a. \(n=6, t=-2.3, \alpha=.05\) b. \(n=15, t=-3.1, \alpha=.01\) c. \(n=12, t=-1.3, \alpha=.05\) d. \(n=6, t=.7, \alpha=.05\) e. \(n=6, \bar{x}=6.68, s / \sqrt{n}=.0820\)

A random sample of soil specimens was obtained, and the amount of organic matter \((\%)\) in the soil was determined for each specimen, resulting in the accompanying data (from "Engineering Properties of Soil," Soil Science, 1998: 93-102). \(\begin{array}{llllllll}1.10 & 5.09 & 0.97 & 1.59 & 4.60 & 0.32 & 0.55 & 1.45 \\\ 0.14 & 4.47 & 1.20 & 3.50 & 5.02 & 4.67 & 5.22 & 2.69 \\ 3.98 & 3.17 & 3.03 & 2.21 & 0.69 & 4.47 & 3.31 & 1.17 \\ 0.76 & 1.17 & 1.57 & 2.62 & 1.66 & 2.05 & & \end{array}\) The values of the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and (estimated) standard error of the mean are \(2.481,1.616\), and \(.295\), respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is something other than \(3 \%\) ? Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses at significance level .10. Would your conclusion be different if \(\alpha=.05\) had been used? [Note: A normal probability plot of the data shows an acceptable pattern in light of the reasonably large sample size.]

The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let \(\mu\) denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paint under consideration. A test of \(H_{0}: \mu=20\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu>20\) will be based on a random sample of size \(n\) from a normal population distribution. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations? a. \(n=15, t=3.2, \alpha=.05\) b. \(n=9, t=1.8, \alpha=.01\) c. \(n=24, t=-.2\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.