/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 38 Ultra high performance concrete ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Ultra high performance concrete (UHPC) is a relatively new construction material that is characterized by strong adhesive properties with other materials. The article "Adhesive Power of Ultra High Performance Concrete from a Thermodynamic Point of View" \((J\). of Materials in Civil Engr., 2012: 1050-1058) described an investigation of the intermolecular forces for UHPC connected to various substrates. The following work of adhesion measurements (in \(\mathrm{mJ} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) ) for UHPC specimens adhered to steel appeared in the article: \(\begin{array}{lllll}107.1 & 109.5 & 107.4 & 106.8 & 108.1\end{array}\) a. Is it plausible that the given sample observations were selected from a normal distribution? b. Calculate a two-sided \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the true average work of adhesion for UHPC adhered to steel. Does the interval suggest that 107 is a plausible value for the true average work of adhesion for UHPC adhered to steel? What about 110 ? c. Predict the resulting work of adhesion value resulting from a single future replication of the experiment by calculating a \(95 \%\) prediction interval, and compare the width of this interval to the width of the CI from (b). d. Calculate an interval for which you can have a high degree of confidence that at least \(95 \%\) of all UHPC specimens adhered to steel will have work of adhesion values between the limits of the interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Yes; b. (106.42, 109.14); 107 is plausible, 110 is not; c. (105.67, 109.89), wider; d. (103.70, 111.86) for 95% of specimens.

Step by step solution

01

Assess Normality

To determine whether the sample data is from a normal distribution, we use a graphical method such as a Q-Q plot. We plot the sample quantiles against the theoretical quantiles of a normal distribution. If the points roughly form a straight line, the data can be assumed to come from a normal distribution.
02

Calculate Sample Statistics

First, calculate the sample mean and standard deviation from the data. The work adhesion values are 107.1, 109.5, 107.4, 106.8, 108.1. The mean \( \bar{x} = \frac{107.1 + 109.5 + 107.4 + 106.8 + 108.1}{5} = 107.78\) and the standard deviation \( s = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1}} = 1.01 \).
03

Two-Sided Confidence Interval

To compute the 95% confidence interval for the mean, use the formula \( \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \), where \( t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \) is the t-critical value for 95% confidence with 4 degrees of freedom. From t-distribution tables, this value is approximately 2.776. Thus, the CI is \( 107.78 \pm 2.776 \times \frac{1.01}{\sqrt{5}} \approx (106.42, 109.14) \). 107 is a plausible value, but 110 is not.
04

Prediction Interval

For a 95% prediction interval use the formula \( \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-1} s \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{n}} \). Thus, \( 107.78 \pm 2.776 \times 1.01 \times \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{5}} \approx (105.67, 109.89) \). This interval is wider than the confidence interval, reflecting more uncertainty around individual predictions.
05

Interval for 95% of Data

A statistical method such as creating tolerance intervals would give us the desired interval: use the formula \( \bar{x} \pm k \cdot s \) where \( k \) is a factor depending on the desired coverage percentage, confidence level, and sample size. From tables for a 95%/95% interval with n=5, \( k \approx 4.03 \), so the interval is \( 107.78 \pm 4.03 \times 1.01 \approx (103.70, 111.86) \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
When we create a confidence interval, our goal is to estimate the range in which the true population parameter, such as the average or mean, lies. In the case of the Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) data, we calculated a two-sided 95% confidence interval. This interval helps us understand the range that contains the true average work of adhesion of UHPC adhered to steel with a 95% chance.
The formula used is \( \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \), where \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean, \( s \) is the sample standard deviation, and \( t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \) is the t-critical value from the t-distribution table.
  • The calculated mean of the observations is 107.78.
  • The standard deviation is 1.01.
  • For 4 degrees of freedom, the t-value is roughly 2.776.
This gives us an interval: \((106.42, 109.14)\). Within this interval, 107 is plausible, but 110 stretches beyond our calculated range, suggesting it might not be the true mean.
Prediction Interval
When we want to predict the value of a single, future observation from the same population, we use a prediction interval. This differs from a confidence interval since it includes another layer of uncertainty, about individual future observations.
In our UHPC case, the prediction interval formula is \( \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-1} s \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{n}} \). This perfect blend of the sample mean and standard deviation with an additional adjustment for variability considers that individual observations can have more variability than the mean.
  • This prediction interval is formed as \((105.67, 109.89)\).
  • Notice, it is wider than the confidence interval because it covers a future single observation.
The prediction interval recognizes the natural fluctuations that a single measurement might experience, making it a valuable tool for anticipating real-world variations.
Normal Distribution
The assumption of data being normally distributed is key in statistical inference. A normal distribution is a bell-shaped, symmetric curve describing how data values spread around the mean. In practice, we check this assumption to validate that our statistical methods will yield reliable results.
For the UHPC adhesion values, the normality check can be performed visually using a Q-Q plot.
  • A Q-Q plot compares your data to the expected quantiles of a normal distribution.
  • If the plot aligns closely with a straight line, the data can be interpreted as being normally distributed.
Checking normality safeguards our confidence intervals, prediction intervals, and other statistical methods from leading us astray by false assumptions.
Tolerance Interval
A tolerance interval is quite different from confidence or prediction intervals. While a confidence interval estimates where a population parameter might be, and a prediction interval forecasts a future observation, a tolerance interval aims to capture a proportion of the population data within a specified confidence level.
For UHPC, we want an interval that includes at least 95% of all possible work of adhesion values for a high confidence level of 95%. The formula used is \( \bar{x} \pm k \cdot s \), where \( k \) is a calculated factor based on desired confidence and coverage.
  • For our data with the sample size of 5, \( k \approx 4.03 \).
  • Our tolerance interval thus becomes: \((103.70, 111.86)\).
This interval provides a comprehensive range where we confidently expect most real-world UHPC measures to fall, reflecting not just the average but the breadth of variation in actual data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a random sample of 50 bottles of a particular brand of cough syrup is selected and the alcohol content of each bottle is determined. Let \(\mu\) denote the average alcohol content for the population of all bottles of the brand under study. Suppose that the resulting \(95 \%\) confidence interval is \((7.8,9.4)\). a. Would a \(90 \%\) confidence interval calculated from this same sample have been narrower or wider than the given interval? Explain your reasoning. b. Consider the following statement: There is a \(95 \%\) chance that \(\mu\) is between \(7.8\) and \(9.4\). Is this statement correct? Why or why not? c. Consider the following statement: We can be highly confident that \(95 \%\) of all bottles of this type of cough syrup have an alcohol content that is between \(7.8\) and 9.4. Is this statement correct? Why or why not? d. Consider the following statement: If the process of selecting a sample of size 50 and then computing the corresponding \(95 \%\) interval is repeated 100 times, 95 of the resulting intervals will include \(\mu\). Is this statement correct? Why or why not?

On the basis of extensive tests, the yield point of a particular type of mild steel-reinforcing bar is known to be normally distributed with \(\sigma=100\). The composition of bars has been slightly modified, but the modification is not believed to have affected either the normality or the value of \(\sigma\). a. Assuming this to be the case, if a sample of 25 modified bars resulted in a sample average yield point of \(8439 \mathrm{lb}\), compute a \(90 \%\) CI for the true average yield point of the modified bar. b. How would you modify the interval in part (a) to obtain a confidence level of \(92 \%\) ?

According to the article "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" (Polymer Testing, 2009: 567-571), "tests currently used for condoms are surrogates for the challenges they face in use," including a test for holes, an inflation test, a package seal test, and tests of dimensions and lubricant quality (all fertile territory for the use of statistical methodology!). The investigators developed a new test that adds cyclic strain to a level well below breakage and determines the number of cycles to break. A sample of 20 condoms of one particular type resulted in a sample mean number of 1584 and a sample standard deviation of 607 . Calculate and interpret a confidence interval at the \(99 \%\) confidence level for the true average number of cycles to break. [Note: The article presented the results of hypothesis tests based on the \(t\) distribution; the validity of these depends on assuming normal population distributions.]

Silicone implant augmentation rhinoplasty is used to correct congenital nose deformities. The success of the procedure depends on various biomechanical properties of the human nasal periosteum and fascia. The article "Biomechanics in Augmentation Rhinoplasty" (J. of Med. Engr. and Tech., 2005: 14-17) reported that for a sample of 15 (newly deceased) adults, the mean failure strain \((\%)\) was \(25.0\), and the standard deviation was \(3.5\). a. Assuming a normal distribution for failure strain, estimate true average strain in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. b. Predict the strain for a single adult in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. How does the prediction compare to the estimate calculated in part (a)?

The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life reported on Dec. 9,2009 , that in a survey of 2003 American adults, \(25 \%\) said they believed in astrology. a. Calculate and interpret a confidence interval at the \(99 \%\) confidence level for the proportion of all adult Americans who believe in astrology. b. What sample size would be required for the width of a \(99 \%\) CI to be at most 05 irrespective of the value of \(\hat{p}\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.