/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 The following observations are l... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following observations are lifetimes (days) subsequent to diagnosis for individuals suffering from blood cancer ("A Goodness of Fit Approach to the Class of Life Distributions with Unknown Age," Quality and Reliability Engr. Intl., 2012: 761-766): a. Can a confidence interval for true average lifetime be calculated without assuming anything about the nature of the lifetime distribution? Explain your reasoning. [Note: A normal probability plot of the data exhibits a reasonably linear pattern.] b. Calculate and interpret a confidence interval with a \(99 \%\) confidence level for true average lifetime. [Hint: \(\bar{x}=1191.6\) and \(s=506.6\).]

Short Answer

Expert verified
A confidence interval can be calculated because of the normal distribution assumption. For a \(99\%\) confidence interval, use \(\bar{x} = 1191.6\), \(s = 506.6\), and the z-score \(2.576\).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Confidence Interval Without Assumptions

To determine if a confidence interval for the true average lifetime can be calculated without assumptions, consider the nature of the dataset distribution. In statistics, when the sample size is large, the Central Limit Theorem allows us to assume normality despite the population distribution. The problem also notes that a normal probability plot of the data shows a reasonably linear pattern, suggesting the data is approximately normally distributed. Hence, it is reasonable to calculate a confidence interval without assuming a specific distribution initially because of the large size and the linear plot observation. Nonetheless, normality provides more assurance in calculating confidence intervals.
02

Recognizing the Importance of Normality

Although it is theoretically possible to construct a confidence interval without normality assumptions using non-parametric methods, the problem's indication of normality (via the probability plot) supports using parametric methods that require normality. Therefore, for practical purposes, assuming normality is beneficial for calculating the confidence interval.
03

Setting Up the Confidence Interval Calculation

The formula to calculate a confidence interval for the true mean when the standard deviation is known or approximated is given by: \[\bar{x} \pm z \left(\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\right)\]where \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(s\) is the sample standard deviation, \(n\) is the sample size, and \(z\) is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level. Here, \(z\) for a \(99\%\) confidence interval is approximately \(2.576\).
04

Applying the Formula

Before applying the formula, you need to know the sample size, \(n\). However, assuming a large sample size (enabling usage of the Central Limit Theorem), insert values:\[\bar{x} = 1191.6, \ s = 506.6,\ n = \text{{large}}\]The margin of error (E) is calculated by:\[E = 2.576 \left(\frac{506.6}{\sqrt{n}}\right)\].The confidence interval for true lifespan is:\[1191.6 \pm E.\]
05

Finalize and Interpret the Confidence Interval

Substitute the known values to find the numeric confidence interval. If the sample size \(n\) is given, calculate the margin of error and confidence interval explicitly. The interpretation would be: 'With 99% confidence, the true average lifetime of individuals with the condition lies within this interval.' This provides a statistical estimation of the mean lifetime based on sample data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Central Limit Theorem
The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is a fundamental principle in statistics that comes in handy when dealing with confidence intervals. It states that when you take samples from a population with any distribution (like skewed or not perfectly normal), the distribution of the sample means will approximate a normal distribution, provided the sample size is sufficiently large. This is great news because it means that, under the CLT, you can often use methods associated with normal distributions even if the population isn't normally distributed.
In the context of the exercise, even if the lifetime data distribution is unknown or non-normal initially, the CLT allows us to assume a normal distribution for the sample mean, given a large sample size. This assumption makes it possible to calculate confidence intervals without strict concerns about the original data distribution being normal.
Normal Probability Plot
A normal probability plot is a graphical technique used to identify if a dataset approximately follows a normal distribution. It plots each data point against a theoretical normal distribution in such a way that data which is perfectly normally distributed will appear in a straight line. Any deviations from this line can indicate departures from normality.
In the given exercise, it's mentioned that the normal probability plot exhibits a reasonably linear pattern. This implies that the data is approximately normally distributed, thus justifying the application of parametric methods and the calculation of a confidence interval with a normal distribution assumption. It's a useful visualization method to verify the usual assumptions needed for normal-theory-based statistical techniques.
Parametric Methods
Parametric methods are statistical methods that rely on assumptions regarding the distribution of the population from which the sample is drawn—typically, these involve assuming normal distribution of the data. These methods are powerful when assumptions hold true because they utilize the data fully and can provide more precise estimates.
In the exercise, the normal probability plot indicating approximate normality allows us to confidently use parametric methods for calculating the confidence interval. Parametric methods, like using the Z-score, leverage this approximate normality to deliver reliable statistical assessments.
Thus, they are favored when conditions permit as they often offer more exact and powerful results compared to non-parametric alternatives.
Z-Score
The Z-score is a measure of how many standard deviations an element is from the mean. It is a critical component in calculating confidence intervals when using parametric methods. The Z-score is used when you know the population standard deviation, or when the sample size is large, allowing the sample standard deviation to be a good approximation.
For a 99% confidence interval, the Z-score is typically 2.576 because it covers 99% of the area under a standard normal distribution curve. This score is used in the formula for calculating the confidence interval:
  • \[ar{x} \pm z \left(\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\right)\]
Where \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(s\) is the sample standard deviation, and \(n\) is the sample size. The Z-score essentially standardizes your data, facilitating the derivation of confidence intervals for parameters such as the true average lifetime.
Margin of Error
The margin of error is a crucial part of constructing a confidence interval, providing a range around the sample mean in which the true population mean is expected to lie. It reflects the uncertainty or variability we might expect when making inferences about a population from a sample.
In the exercise, the margin of error is determined using:
  • \[E = 2.576 \left(\frac{506.6}{\sqrt{n}}\right) \]
Where \(2.576\) is the Z-score for a 99% confidence level, \(506.6\) is the sample's standard deviation, and \(n\) is the sample size.
The larger the sample size, the smaller the margin of error, leading to a more precise confidence interval. Understanding and calculating the margin of error allows statisticians to tell us, with a certain degree of confidence, how close the sample statistics are to the true population parameters.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The amount of lateral expansion (mils) was determined for a sample of \(n=9\) pulsed-power gas metal arc welds used in LNG ship containment tanks. The resulting sample standard deviation was \(s=2.81\) mils. Assuming normality, derive a \(95 \% \mathrm{CI}\) for \(\sigma^{2}\) and for \(\sigma\).

A more extensive tabulation of \(t\) critical values than what appears in this book shows that for the \(t\) distribution with 20 df, the areas to the right of the values \(.687, .860\), and \(1.064\) are \(.25, .20\), and \(.15\), respectively. What is the confidence level for each of the following three confidence intervals for the mean \(\mu\) of a normal population distribution? Which of the three intervals would you recommend be used, and why? a. \((\bar{x}-.687 s / \sqrt{21}, \bar{x}+1.725 s / \sqrt{21})\) b. \((\bar{x}-.860 s / \sqrt{21}, \bar{x}+1.325 s / \sqrt{21})\) c. \((\bar{x}-1.064 s / \sqrt{21}, \bar{x}+1.064 s / \sqrt{21})\)

The article "Distributions of Compressive Strength Obtained from Various Diameter Cores" (ACI Materials \(J ., 2012: 597-606\) ) described a study in which compressive strengths were determined for concrete specimens of various types, core diameters, and lengthto-diameter ratios. For one particular type, diameter, and \(/ / d\) ratio, the 18 tested specimens resulted in a sample mean compressive strength of 64.41 MPa and a sample standard deviation of \(10.32 \mathrm{MPa}\). Normality of the compressive strength distribution was judged to be quite plausible. a. Calculate a confidence interval with confidence level \(98 \%\) for the true average compressive strength under these circumstances. b. Calculate a \(98 \%\) lower prediction bound for the compressive strength of a single future specimen tested under the given circumstances. [Hint: \(t_{.01217}=\) 2.224.]

Each of the following is a confidence interval for \(\mu=\) true average (i.e., population mean) resonance frequency (Hz) for all tennis rackets of a certain type: \((114.4,115.6)(114.1,115.9)\) a. What is the value of the sample mean resonance frequency? b. Both intervals were calculated from the same sample data. The confidence level for one of these intervals is \(90 \%\) and for the other is \(99 \%\). Which of the intervals has the \(90 \%\) confidence level, and why?

Silicone implant augmentation rhinoplasty is used to correct congenital nose deformities. The success of the procedure depends on various biomechanical properties of the human nasal periosteum and fascia. The article "Biomechanics in Augmentation Rhinoplasty" (J. of Med. Engr. and Tech., 2005: 14-17) reported that for a sample of 15 (newly deceased) adults, the mean failure strain \((\%)\) was \(25.0\), and the standard deviation was \(3.5\). a. Assuming a normal distribution for failure strain, estimate true average strain in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. b. Predict the strain for a single adult in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. How does the prediction compare to the estimate calculated in part (a)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.