/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 27 Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from a gamma distribution with parameters \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\). a. Derive the equations whose solutions yield the maximum likelihood estimators of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\). Do you think they can be solved explicitly? b. Show that the mle of \(\mu=\alpha \beta\) is \(\hat{\mu}=\bar{X}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
MLE of \( \mu = \alpha \beta \) is \( \hat{\mu} = \bar{X} \).\( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) require numerical methods.

Step by step solution

01

Write the likelihood function

The probability density function of the gamma distribution with parameters \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) is given by \( f(x; \alpha, \beta) = \frac{\beta^\alpha}{\Gamma(\alpha)} x^{\alpha - 1} e^{-\beta x} \) for \( x > 0 \).For a random sample \( X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n \), the likelihood function \( L(\alpha, \beta) \) is the product of individual densities:\[ L(\alpha, \beta) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} \left( \frac{\beta^\alpha}{\Gamma(\alpha)} X_i^{\alpha - 1} e^{-\beta X_i} \right) \].Taking the natural logarithm of the likelihood function (log-likelihood) simplifies the derivation.\[ \ln L(\alpha, \beta) = n (\alpha \ln \beta - \ln \Gamma(\alpha)) + (\alpha - 1) \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln X_i - \beta \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i \].
02

Derive the equations for MLEs

To find the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \), take the partial derivatives of the log-likelihood function with respect to \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \), and set them to zero.1. Partial derivative with respect to \( \alpha \): \[ \frac{\partial \ln L}{\partial \alpha} = n \ln \beta - n \psi(\alpha) + \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln X_i \], where \( \psi(\alpha) \) is the digamma function. Set to zero to get: \[ n \ln \beta - n \psi(\alpha) + \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln X_i = 0 \].2. Partial derivative with respect to \( \beta \): \[ \frac{\partial \ln L}{\partial \beta} = \frac{n \alpha}{\beta} - \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i \]. Set to zero to get: \[ \frac{n \alpha}{\beta} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i \].
03

Assess solvability of the equations

The equations derived in Step 2 are:1. \[ n \ln \beta - n \psi(\alpha) + \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln X_i = 0 \]2. \[ \frac{n \alpha}{\beta} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i \].The first equation involves the digamma function, which is complex and typically solved using numerical methods. The second equation can be rearranged to express \( \beta \) in terms of \( \alpha \), but finding exact solutions for both \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) explicitly involves solving non-linear equations numerically.
04

Derive the MLE for \( \mu = \alpha \beta \)

From Step 2, we have the equation \( \frac{n \alpha}{\beta} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i \), which simplifies to \( \alpha \beta = \frac{\beta}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i = \bar{X} \).Thus, the MLE for \( \mu = \alpha \beta \) is simply the sample mean:\[ \hat{\mu} = \bar{X} \].
05

Conclusion

In conclusion, the MLE of \( \mu = \alpha \beta \) is obtained directly as the sample mean, \( \bar{X} \). The equations for finding \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) involve non-linear functions like the digamma function, which generally require numerical methods to solve explicitly. Therefore, while \( \hat{\mu} \) is straightforward, \( \hat{\alpha} \) and \( \hat{\beta} \) are not explicitly solvable without further computational methods.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Gamma Distribution
The gamma distribution is a continuous probability distribution often used to model skewed data and durations of time until events occur. It is characterized by two parameters: the shape parameter, \( \alpha \), and the rate parameter, \( \beta \). This distribution is particularly useful in various fields, such as finance and meteorology, for processes that naturally exhibit waiting times or life spans.
The probability density function (PDF) of the gamma distribution is given by:
  • \( f(x; \alpha, \beta) = \frac{\beta^\alpha}{\Gamma(\alpha)} x^{\alpha - 1} e^{-\beta x} \) for \( x > 0 \)
Here, \( \Gamma(\alpha) \) is the gamma function, which generalizes the factorial function for non-integer values. The shape of the gamma distribution can vary greatly depending on the parameters, allowing it to model a wide range of distributions.
The gamma distribution becomes more symmetric as \( \alpha \) increases, but remains positively skewed for smaller values of \( \alpha \). This makes it very versatile in representing different types of data.
Digamma Function
The digamma function, denoted by \( \psi(x) \), is the logarithmic derivative of the gamma function. In simpler terms, it is the derivative of \( \ln(\Gamma(x)) \). The digamma function often surfaces in statistical applications, particularly in maximum likelihood estimations involving gamma distributions.
When solving for maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs), the digamma function comes into play as we deal with derivations related to the gamma distribution parameters. It is an essential component in the formula:
  • \( \frac{\partial \ln L}{\partial \alpha} = n \ln \beta - n \psi(\alpha) + \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln X_i \)
In practice, the digamma function can be complex to handle algebraically because it involves polynomials and special functions. Nevertheless, it is computationally manageable using software tools designed for numerical analysis.
Understanding the digamma function is fundamental for handling MLE problems involving complex distributions.
Numerical Methods
Numerical methods are computational techniques used to solve mathematical problems that do not have explicit analytical solutions. They are crucial for finding solutions to the equations derived in maximum likelihood estimation, especially when dealing with complex functions like the digamma.
In situations where we encounter non-linear equations, such as:
  • \( n \ln \beta - n \psi(\alpha) + \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln X_i = 0 \)
  • \( \frac{n \alpha}{\beta} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i \)
We turn to numerical methods to estimate parameters \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \). Common techniques include:
  • Iterative methods such as Newton-Raphson
  • Gradient descent algorithms
  • Software packages like R or Python libraries
These methods allow for approximations that are sufficiently close to actual values, thereby enabling us to deal effectively with statistical models where exact solutions are intractable.
Sample Mean
The sample mean is a straightforward statistical measure representing the average of a set of observations. It is calculated as the sum of all sample data points divided by the number of observations in the sample. Mathematically, it is expressed as:
  • \( \bar{X} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i \)
This statistic is not only a measure of central tendency but also an estimator for parameters in various probability distributions. For instance, in the context of the gamma distribution, the MLE for \( \mu = \alpha \beta \) is the sample mean \( \hat{\mu} = \bar{X} \).
The sample mean provides a simple yet powerful summary metric. It is widely used due to its efficiency and mathematical properties like the central limit theorem, which indicates that the distribution of sample means approaches a normal distribution as the sample size grows.
Thus, understanding the concept of the sample mean is critical for interpreting and solving many statistical estimation problems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X\) represent the error in making a measurement of a physical characteristic or property (e.g., the boiling point of a particular liquid). It is often reasonable to assume that \(E(X)=0\) and that \(X\) has a normal distribution. Thus the paf of any particular measurement error is (where we have used \(\theta\) in place of \(\sigma^{2}\) ). Now suppose that \(n\) independent measurements are made, resulting in measurement errors \(X_{1}=x_{1}, X_{2}=x_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}=x_{n}\). Obtain the mle of \(\theta\).

Consider randomly selecting \(n\) segments of pipe and determining the corrosion loss \((\mathrm{mm})\) in the wall thickness for each one. Denote these corrosion losses by \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\). The article "A Probabilistic Model for a Gas Explosion Due to Leakages in the Grey Cast Iron Gas Mains" (Reliability Engr. and System Safety (2013:270-279) proposes a linear corrosion model: \(Y_{i}=t_{l} R\), where \(t_{i}\) is the age of the pipe and \(R\), the corrosion rate, is exponentially distributed with parameter \(\lambda\). Obtain the maximum likelihood estimator of the exponential parameter (the resulting mle appears in the cited article). [Hint: If \(c>0\) and \(X\) has an exponential distribution, so does \(c X\).]

At time \(t=0,20\) identical components are tested. The lifetime distribution of each is exponential with parameter \(\lambda\). The experimenter then leaves the test facility unmonitored. On his return 24 hours later, the experimenter immediately terminates the test after noticing that \(y=15\) of the 20 components are still in operation (so 5 have failed). Derive the mle of \(\lambda\). [Hint: Let \(Y=\) the number that survive 24 hours. Then \(Y \sim \operatorname{Bin}(n, p)\). What is the mle of \(p\) ? Now notice that \(p=P\left(X_{i} \geq 24\right)\), where \(X_{i}\) is exponentially distributed. This relates \(\lambda\) to \(p\), so the former can be estimated once the latter has been.]

Of \(n_{1}\) randomly selected male smokers, \(X_{1}\) smoked filter cigarettes, whereas of \(n_{2}\) randomly selected female smokers, \(X_{2}\) smoked filter cigarettes. Let \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) denote the probabilities that a randomly selected male and female, respectively, smoke filter cigarettes. a. Show that \(\left(X_{1} / n_{1}\right)-\left(X_{2} / n_{2}\right)\) is an unbiased estimator for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) - [Hint: \(E\left(X_{i}\right)=n_{i} p_{i}\) for \(i=1,2\).] b. What is the standard error of the estimator in part (a)? c. How would you use the observed values \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) to estimate the standard error of your estimator? d. If \(n_{1}=n_{2}=200, x_{1}=127\), and \(x_{2}=176\), use the estimator of part (a) to obtain an estimate of \(p_{1}-p_{2}\). e. Use the result of part (c) and the data of part (d) to estimate the standard error of the estimator.

Each of 150 newly manufactured items is examined and the number of scratches per item is recorded (the items are supposed to be free of scratches), yielding the following data: Number of scratches \begin{tabular}{lcccccccc} per item & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 \\ \hline Observed frequency & 18 & 37 & 42 & 30 & 13 & 7 & 2 & 1 \end{tabular} Let \(X=\) the number of scratches on a randomly chosen item, and assume that \(X\) has a Poisson distribution with parameter \(\mu\). a. Find an unbiased estimator of \(\mu\) and compute the estimate for the data. [Hint: \(E(X)=\mu\) for \(X\) Poisson, so \(E(\bar{X})=?]\) b. What is the standard deviation (standard error) of your estimator? Compute the estimated standard error. [Hint: \(\sigma_{X}^{2}-\mu\) for \(X\) Poisson.]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.