/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 A diagnostic test for a certain ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A diagnostic test for a certain disease is applied to \(n\) individuals known to not have the disease. Let \(X=\) the number among the \(n\) test results that are positive (indicating presence of the disease, so \(X\) is the number of false positives) and \(p=\) the probability that a disease-free individual's test result is positive (i.e., \(p\) is the true proportion of test results from disease-free individuals that are positive). Assume that only \(X\) is available rather than the actual sequence of test results. a. Derive the maximum likelihood estimator of \(p\). If \(n=20\) and \(x=3\), what is the estimate? b. Is the estimator of part (a) unbiased? c. If \(n=20\) and \(x=3\), what is the mle of the probability \((1-p)^{5}\) that none of the next five tests done on disease-free individuals are positive? 21\. Let \(X\) have a Weibull distribution with parameters \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\), so $$ \begin{gathered} E(X)=\beta \cdot \Gamma(1+1 / \alpha) \\ V(X)=\beta^{2}\left[\Gamma(1+2 / \alpha)-[\Gamma(1+1 / \alpha)]^{2}\right] \end{gathered} $$ a. Based on a random sample \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\), write equations for the method of moments estimators of \(\beta\) and \(\alpha\). Show that, once the estimate of \(\alpha\) has been obtained, the estimate of \(\beta\) can be found from a table of the gamma function and that the estimate of \(\alpha\) is the solution to a complicated equation involving the gamma function. b. If \(n=20, \bar{x}=28.0\), and \(\Sigma x_{i}^{2}=16,500\), compute the estimates. [Hint: \(\left.[\Gamma(1.2)]^{2} / \Gamma(1.4)=.95 .\right]\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. \(\hat{p} = 0.15\); b. Yes, it's unbiased; c. \(0.85^5 \approx 0.444\).

Step by step solution

01

Define the likelihood function

Given that the individuals are disease-free, the problem involves determining the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the probability \(p\) for false positives. The outcome \(X\) follows a binomial distribution: \(X \sim \text{Binomial}(n, p)\). The likelihood function is given by\: \(L(p) = \binom{n}{x} p^x (1-p)^{n-x}\).
02

Derive the log-likelihood function

To simplify the differentiation process, convert the likelihood function into a log-likelihood function:\: \(\log L(p) = \log\binom{n}{x} + x \log(p) + (n-x)\log(1-p)\). Here, \(\log\binom{n}{x}\) is a constant and doesn't affect the differentiation with respect to \(p\).
03

Differentiate the log-likelihood function

Differentiate \(\log L(p)\) with respect to \(p\) to find its maximum:\: \(\frac{d}{dp} [x \log(p) + (n-x)\log(1-p)] = \frac{x}{p} - \frac{n-x}{1-p}\).
04

Solve for p

Set the derivative from Step 3 to zero to find the critical points:\: \(\frac{x}{p} - \frac{n-x}{1-p} = 0\). Solve for \(p\), yielding\: \(\hat{p} = \frac{x}{n}\).
05

Calculate the MLE for a Specific Case

Given \(n = 20\) and \(x = 3\), substitute these values into \(\hat{p} = \frac{x}{n}\) to compute the MLE for \(p\):\: \(\hat{p} = \frac{3}{20} = 0.15\).
06

Check if the estimator is unbiased

An estimator \(\hat{p}\) is unbiased if \(E[\hat{p}] = p\). For the sample proportion \(\hat{p} = \frac{X}{n}\), \(E[\hat{p}] = \frac{E[X]}{n} = \frac{np}{n} = p\), showing that \(\hat{p}\) is indeed unbiased.
07

Compute the probability of 5 consecutive negative tests

The probability that none of the next 5 tests are positive is given by \((1-p)^5\). Substitute the MLE \(\hat{p} = 0.15\) into this expression:\: \((1-0.15)^5 = 0.85^5 \approx 0.444\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Binomial Distribution
The binomial distribution is a fundamental concept in probability and statistics, often used to model scenarios where there are exactly two outcomes, like success or failure on a given trial. Suppose you administer a diagnostic test to individuals without a disease and want to determine how many return a false positive result. This scenario can be modeled with a binomial distribution. In the binomial distribution, the random variable, often represented as \(X\), follows the notation \(X \sim \text{Binomial}(n, p)\). Here, \(n\) denotes the number of trials, or in our context, the number of tests, while \(p\) represents the probability of a false positive on any individual test.

Key characteristics of a binomial distribution include:
  • Each trial is independent.
  • There are only two possible outcomes per trial: success (false positive) or failure (true negative).
  • The probability of success \(p\) is constant across all trials.
  • The random variable \(X\) counts the number of successes in \(n\) trials.
Thus, knowing the binomial distribution, we can use the maximum likelihood estimation approach to derive estimators for the probability \(p\).
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is another useful probability distribution, particularly popular in reliability analysis and life data analysis. It is specified by two parameters: \(\alpha\) (the shape parameter) and \(\beta\) (the scale parameter). In a Weibull distribution, different combinations of these parameters result in various shapes of the distribution's curve, which can model diverse types of data. The Weibull distribution is recognized for its flexibility in representing defect lifetimes, failure times, and other phenomena related to duration.

For a random variable \(X\) with a Weibull distribution:
  • The expected value or mean is defined as \(E(X) = \beta \cdot \Gamma(1+1/\alpha)\).
  • The variance, indicating the spread of the distribution, is \(V(X) = \beta^2 [\Gamma(1+2/\alpha) - [\Gamma(1+1/\alpha)]^2]\).
The function \(\Gamma\) represents the gamma function, closely related to factorials for non-integers, aiding in the computation of these moments.
Method of Moments
The method of moments is a statistical technique used to derive parameter estimates from the moments of a sample. A 'moment' is a quantitative measure related to the shape of a set of points. This method involves equating sample moments (such as mean and variance) to theoretical moments derived from the distribution to estimate parameters.

When estimating parameters \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) for a Weibull distribution from sample data \(X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n\), the process follows these steps:
  • Calculate sample moments like mean \(\bar{x}\) and variance.
  • Set these sample moments equal to the theoretical moments of the Weibull distribution.
  • Solve the resulting equations to find estimates for the parameters.
In practice, finding these estimates might involve complicated formulas and numerical solutions, especially when dealing with non-integer gamma functions, but this approach offers a way to derive parameters from empirical data effectively.
Bias of Estimators
The bias of an estimator is an essential concept in statistics, providing insight into the accuracy and reliability of estimation methods. An estimator is said to be unbiased if its expected value equals the true parameter of interest. In other words, an unbiased estimator accurately centers around the true value.

Consider, for example, an estimator \(\hat{p}\) for the probability of a false positive in a binomial distribution. The estimator \(\hat{p}\) was derived via maximum likelihood estimation as \(\hat{p} = \frac{X}{n}\), where \(X\) is the number of false positives, and \(n\) is the total number of tests conducted. For \(\hat{p}\) to be unbiased, the expected value \(E[\hat{p}]\) should equal the true probability \(p\). Through mathematical derivation, it can be shown that \(E[\hat{p}] = \frac{np}{n} = p\), confirming that \(\hat{p}\) is indeed unbiased.

Understanding estimator bias helps in choosing the correct estimation method for analysis, ensuring that the predictions and conclusions drawn are as accurate as possible.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An investigator wishes to estimate the proportion of students at a certain university who have violated the honor code. Having obtained a random sample of \(n\) students, she realizes that asking each, "Have you violated the honor code?" will probably result in some untruthful responses. Consider the following scheme, called a randomized response technique. The investigator makes up a deck of 100 cards, of which 50 are of type I and 50 are of type II. Type I: Have you violated the honor code (yes or no)? Type II: Is the last digit of your telephone number a 0 , 1 , or 2 (yes or no)? Each student in the random sample is asked to mix the deck, draw a card, and answer the resulting question truthfully. Because of the irrelevant question on type II cards, a yes response no longer stigmatizes the respondent, so we assume that responses are truthful. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of honor- code violators (i.e., the probability of a randomly selected student being a violator), and let \(\lambda=P\) (yes response). Then \(\lambda\) and \(p\) are related by \(\lambda=.5 p+(.5)(.3)\) a. Let \(Y\) denote the number of yes responses, so \(Y \sim\) Bin \((n, \lambda)\). Thus \(Y / n\) is an unbiased estimator of \(\lambda\). Derive an estimator for \(p\) based on \(Y\). If \(n=80\) and \(y=20\), what is your estimate? [Hinr: Solve \(\lambda=.5 p+.15\) for \(p\) and then substitute \(Y / n\) for \(\lambda .]\) b. Use the fact that \(E(Y / n)=\lambda\) to show that your estimator \(\hat{p}\) is unbiased. c. If there were 70 type I and 30 type II cards, what would be your estimator for \(p\) ?

Consider randomly selecting \(n\) segments of pipe and determining the corrosion loss \((\mathrm{mm})\) in the wall thickness for each one. Denote these corrosion losses by \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\). The article "A Probabilistic Model for a Gas Explosion Due to Leakages in the Grey Cast Iron Gas Mains" (Reliability Engr. and System Safety (2013:270-279) proposes a linear corrosion model: \(Y_{i}=t_{l} R\), where \(t_{i}\) is the age of the pipe and \(R\), the corrosion rate, is exponentially distributed with parameter \(\lambda\). Obtain the maximum likelihood estimator of the exponential parameter (the resulting mle appears in the cited article). [Hint: If \(c>0\) and \(X\) has an exponential distribution, so does \(c X\).]

Of \(n_{1}\) randomly selected male smokers, \(X_{1}\) smoked filter cigarettes, whereas of \(n_{2}\) randomly selected female smokers, \(X_{2}\) smoked filter cigarettes. Let \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) denote the probabilities that a randomly selected male and female, respectively, smoke filter cigarettes. a. Show that \(\left(X_{1} / n_{1}\right)-\left(X_{2} / n_{2}\right)\) is an unbiased estimator for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) - [Hint: \(E\left(X_{i}\right)=n_{i} p_{i}\) for \(i=1,2\).] b. What is the standard error of the estimator in part (a)? c. How would you use the observed values \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) to estimate the standard error of your estimator? d. If \(n_{1}=n_{2}=200, x_{1}=127\), and \(x_{2}=176\), use the estimator of part (a) to obtain an estimate of \(p_{1}-p_{2}\). e. Use the result of part (c) and the data of part (d) to estimate the standard error of the estimator.

At time \(t=0,20\) identical components are tested. The lifetime distribution of each is exponential with parameter \(\lambda\). The experimenter then leaves the test facility unmonitored. On his return 24 hours later, the experimenter immediately terminates the test after noticing that \(y=15\) of the 20 components are still in operation (so 5 have failed). Derive the mle of \(\lambda\). [Hint: Let \(Y=\) the number that survive 24 hours. Then \(Y \sim \operatorname{Bin}(n, p)\). What is the mle of \(p\) ? Now notice that \(p=P\left(X_{i} \geq 24\right)\), where \(X_{i}\) is exponentially distributed. This relates \(\lambda\) to \(p\), so the former can be estimated once the latter has been.]

Suppose the true average growth \(\mu\) of one type of plant during a 1-year period is identical to that of a second type, but the variance of growth for the first type is \(\sigma^{2}\), whereas for the second type the variance is \(4 \sigma^{2}\). Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{w}\) be \(m\) independent growth observations on the first type [so \(E\left(X_{i}\right)=\mu, V\left(X_{j}\right)=\sigma^{2}\) ], and let \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) be \(n\) independent growth observations on the second type \(\left[E\left(Y_{j}\right)=\mu, V\left(Y_{i}\right)=4 \sigma^{2}\right]\). a. Show that the estimator \(\hat{\mu}=\delta \bar{X}+(1-\delta) \bar{Y}\) is unbiased for \(\mu\) (for \(0<\delta<1\), the estimator is a weighted average of the two individual sample means). b. For fixed \(m\) and \(n\), compute \(V(\hat{\mu})\), and then find the value of \(\delta\) that minimizes \(V(\hat{\mu})\). [Hint: Differentiate \(V(\hat{\mu})\) with respect to \(\delta .]\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.