/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Feature recognition from surface... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Feature recognition from surface models of complicated parts is becoming increasingly important in the development of efficient computer-aided design (CAD) systems. The article 'A Computationally Efficient Approach to Feature Abstraction in DesignManufacturing Integration" (J. of Engr. for Industry, 1995: 16-27) contained a graph of \(\log _{\mathrm{s}}\) (total recognition time), with time in sec, versus \(\log _{10}\) (number of edges of a part), from which the following representative values were read: a. Does a scatterplot of \(\log\) (time) versus \(\log (\) edges) suggest an approximate linear relationship between these two variables? b. What probabilistic model for relating \(y=\) recognition time to \(x=\) number of edges is implied by the simple linear regression relationship between the transformed variables? c. Summary quantities calculated from the data are $$ \begin{aligned} &n=16 \quad \Sigma x_{i}^{\prime}=42.4 \quad \Sigma y_{i}^{\prime}=21.69 \\ &\Sigma\left(x_{i}^{\prime}\right)^{2}=126.34 \quad \Sigma\left(y_{i}^{\prime}\right)^{2}=38.5305 \\ &\Sigma x_{i}^{\prime} y_{i}^{\prime}=68.640 \end{aligned} $$ Calculate estimates of the parameters for the model in part (b), and then obtain a point prediction of time when the number of edges is 300 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
The scatterplot suggests a linear relationship. The model is \(\log y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \log x + \varepsilon\). Predicted time for 300 edges is approximately 2.13 seconds.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to check if there's a linear relationship between \(\log \text{ (time)}\) and \(\log \text{ (edges)}\). Further, we need to find a probabilistic model that relates recognition time to the number of edges and estimate the parameters to make predictions.
02

Scatterplot Analysis for Linear Relationship

A scatterplot of \(\log \text{ (time)}\) versus \(\log \text{ (edges)}\) indicates a linear relationship if the points tend to align in a straight line.
03

Recognize the Probabilistic Model

If \(\log \text{ (time)}\) and \(\log \text{ (edges)}\) have a linear relationship, the model for \(y\) (time) and \(x\) (edges) is \(\log y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \log x + \varepsilon\), suggesting that recognition time has a power law relationship with edges.
04

Use Formulas to Calculate Parameters

Calculate \(\hat{\beta_1}\) using \( \hat{\beta_1} = \frac{\Sigma x_i'y_i' - \frac{\Sigma x_i' \Sigma y_i'}{n}}{\Sigma (x_i')^2 - \frac{(\Sigma x_i')^2}{n}}\) and \(\hat{\beta_0}\) using \( \hat{\beta_0} = \frac{\Sigma y_i' - \hat{\beta_1} \Sigma x_i'}{n}\).
05

Calculate \(\hat{\beta_1}\)

Using the given data, \(\hat{\beta_1} = \frac{68.640 - \frac{42.4 \times 21.69}{16}}{126.34 - \frac{(42.4)^2}{16}}\). Calculate this to get \(\hat{\beta_1} = 0.5974\).
06

Calculate \(\hat{\beta_0}\)

Using the result from Step 5 and the given data, \(\hat{\beta_0} = \frac{21.69 - 0.5974 \times 42.4}{16}\). Calculate this to get \(\hat{\beta_0} = -1.1491\).
07

Make Predictions for 300 Edges

To predict \(y\) (time) for \(x = 300\), use the model: \(\log y = -1.1491 + 0.5974 \log_{10} 300\). First calculate \(\log_{10} 300\), approximately 2.4771. Then substitute to get \(\log y = -1.1491 + 0.5974 \times 2.4771 = 0.3283\). Convert back to \(y\) by exponentiating: \(y = 10^{0.3283} \approx 2.13\) seconds.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probabilistic Model
Understanding a probabilistic model is crucial for analyzing the relationship between variables in statistical terms. When working with simple linear regression, we often aim to establish a connection between two variables using a linear equation.
This equation includes a deterministic component and a random error term to reflect real-world unpredictability.
In our context, the probabilistic model helps us understand how recognition time (y) relates to the number of part edges (x).
We express this relationship as
  • \(\log y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \log x + \varepsilon\)
Here, \(\beta_0\) and \(\beta_1\) are parameters, and \(\varepsilon\) represents a random error term.
This model helps capture the systematic trend between transformed variables along with random variability that cannot be explained by the deterministic part alone.
Scatterplot Analysis
A scatterplot is an essential tool in data analysis, providing a graphic representation of the relationship between two numerical variables.
In this case, you create a scatterplot using logs of recognition time and the number of edges.
When analyzing this scatterplot, you're checking for a potential linear relationship between these logs.
  • If points closely follow a straight line, this suggests linearity in the relationship.
  • The slope and direction of the line indicate the nature of this relationship.
Constructing a scatterplot allows you to visually detect trends, clusters, and outliers which might not be obvious from raw data alone.
Additionally, it sets the stage for formulating a suitable regression model.
Parameter Estimation
Parameter estimation involves calculating the coefficients of our regression model, essentially determining the equation of the line that best fits the data.
In simple linear regression, we find the slope \(\hat{\beta_1}\) and the intercept \(\hat{\beta_0}\) using formulas based on least squares estimation.
For slope \(\hat{\beta_1}\), the formula is:
  • \( \hat{\beta_1} = \frac{\Sigma x_i'y_i' - \frac{\Sigma x_i' \Sigma y_i'}{n}}{\Sigma (x_i')^2 - \frac{(\Sigma x_i')^2}{n}} \)
  • This represents the change in \(\log y\) for a one-unit change in \(\log x\).
The intercept \(\hat{\beta_0}\) uses the formula:
  • \(\hat{\beta_0} = \frac{\Sigma y_i' - \hat{\beta_1} \Sigma x_i'}{n} \)
  • This is the expected value of \(\log y\) when \(\log x\) is zero.
By calculating these estimates using our given data, you predict the average response accurately for any value of the predictor variable present in the dataset.
Power Law Relationship
The power law relationship is a distinct type of functional relationship commonly found in natural phenomena.
In our regression context, transforming both variables logarithmically can reveal a power law relationship.
This relationship is identified when a straight line in the log-log plot signifies a functional relationship between the original variables of the form:
  • \(y = kx^b\)
Where:
  • k is a constant and b is the "power" or "exponent"
  • When \(y\) is plotted against \(x\), it may appear non-linear, but plotting \(\log y\) against \(\log x\) will linearize it due to the equation taking the form \(\log y = \log k + b\log x \)
Recognizing this relationship allows us to better understand how changes in one variable scale with the other.
In practical terms, using such a model allows us to conduct predictions and analyses on the proportional effect of edges on recognition time in design processes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a. Show that \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} e_{i}=0\) when the \(e_{i}\) 's are the residuals from a simple linear regression. b. Are the residuals from a simple linear regression independent of one another, positively correlated, or negatively correlated? Explain. c. Show that \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i} e_{i}=0\) for the residuals from a simple linear regression. (This result along with part (a) shows that there are two linear restrictions on the \(e_{i}^{\text {'s, resulting }}\) in a loss of 2 df when the squared residuals are used to estimate \(\sigma^{2}\).) d. Is it true that \(\Sigma_{i=1}^{n} e_{i}^{*}=0\) ? Give a proof or a counter example.

The article "Analysis of the Modeling Methodologies for Predicting the Strength of Air-Jet Spun Yarns" (Textile Res. \(J ., 1997: 39-44\) ) reported on a study carried out to relate yarn tenacity ( \(y\), in \(\mathrm{g} /\) tex \()\) to yarn count \(\left(x_{1}\right.\), in tex), percentage polyester \(\left(x_{2}\right)\), first nozzle pressure \(\left(x_{3}\right.\), in \(\left.\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\right)\), and second nozzle pressure \(\left(x_{4}\right.\), in \(\mathrm{kg} /\) \(\left.\mathrm{cm}^{2}\right)\). The estimate of the constant term in the corresponding multiple regression equation was \(6.121\). The estimated coefficients for the four predictors were \(-.082\), \(.113, .256\), and \(-.219\), respectively, and the coefficient of multiple determination was 946 . a. Assuming that the sample size was \(n=25\), state and test the appropriate hypotheses to decide whether the fitted model specifies a useful linear relationship between the dependent variable and at least one of the four model predictors. b. Again using \(n=25\), calculate the value of adjusted \(R^{2}\). c. Calculate a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for true mean yarn tenacity when yarn count is \(16.5\), yarn contains \(50 \%\) polyester, first nozzle pressure is 3 , and second nozzle pressure is 5 if the estimated standard deviation of predicted tenacity under these circumstances is . 350 .

Given that \(R^{2}=.723\) for the model containing predictors \(x_{1}, x_{4}, x_{5}\), and \(x_{8}\) and \(R^{2}=.689\) for the model with predictors \(x_{1}, x_{3}, x_{5}\), and \(x_{6}\), what can you say about \(R^{2}\) for the model containing predictors a. \(x_{1}, x_{3}, x_{4}, x_{5}, x_{6}\), and \(x_{8}\) ? Explain. b. \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{4}\) ? Explain.

Continuous recording of heart rate can be used to obtain information about the level of exercise intensity or physical strain during sports participation, work, or other daily activities. The article "The Relationship Between Heart Rate and Oxygen Uptake During Non-Steady State Exercise" (Ergonomics, 2000: 1578-1592) reported on a study to investigate using heart rate response \((x\), as a percentage of the maximum rate) to predict oxygen uptake ( \(y\), as a percentage of maximum uptake) during exercise. The accompanying data was read from a graph in the article. $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllll} \mathrm{HR} & 43.5 & 44.0 & 44.0 & 44.5 & 44.0 & 45.0 & 48.0 & 49.0 \\ \hline \mathrm{VO}_{2} & 22.0 & 21.0 & 22.0 & 21.5 & 25.5 & 24.5 & 30.0 & 28.0 \\\ \mathrm{HR} & 49.5 & 51.0 & 54.5 & 57.5 & 57.7 & 61.0 & 63.0 & 72.0 \\ \hline \mathrm{VO}_{2} & 32.0 & 29.0 & 38.5 & 30.5 & 57.0 & 40.0 & 58.0 & 72.0 \end{array} $$ Use a statistical software package to perform a simple linear regression analysis, paying particular attention to the presence of any unusual or influential observations.

Let \(y=\) wear life of a bearing, \(x_{1}=\) oil viscosity, and \(x_{2}=\) load. Suppose that the multiple regression model relating life to viscosity and load is $$ Y=125.0+7.75 x_{1}+.0950 x_{2}-.0090 x_{1} x_{2}+\epsilon $$ a. What is the mean value of life when viscosity is 40 and load is 1100 ? b. When viscosity is 30 , what is the change in mean life associated with an increase of 1 in load? When viscosity is 40 , what is the change in mean life associated with an increase of 1 in load?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.