/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 In an experiment to compare the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In an experiment to compare the tensile strengths of \(I=5\) different types of copper wire, \(J=4\) samples of each type were used. The between-samples and withinsamples estimates of \(\sigma^{2}\) were computed as MSTr \(=\) \(2673.3\) and MSE \(=1094.2\), respectively. Use the \(F\) test at level \(.05\) to test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=\mu_{3}=\mu_{4}=\mu_{5}\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}\) : at least two \(\mu_{i}\) 's are unequal.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Do not reject the null hypothesis; there is not enough evidence to say at least two means differ.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Hypotheses

We are given two hypotheses: the null hypothesis \(H_0\), which states that all population means are equal \((\mu_1 = \mu_2 = \mu_3 = \mu_4 = \mu_5)\), and the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\), which states that at least two means are not equal.
02

Identify the Test Statistic

To test the null hypothesis, we use the \(F\) statistic given by \(F = \frac{MSTr}{MSE}\), where \(MSTr\) is the mean square between groups and \(MSE\) is the mean square error.
03

Calculate the F Statistic

Plug in the given values to calculate the \(F\) statistic: \[F = \frac{2673.3}{1094.2} \approx 2.44\].
04

Determine Degrees of Freedom

The degrees of freedom for \(MSTr\) (between groups) is \(I-1=4\) and for \(MSE\) (within groups) is \(I(J-1)=15\).
05

Find the Critical F Value

Using an \(F\) distribution table and a significance level of \(\alpha = 0.05\) with \(df_1 = 4\) and \(df_2 = 15\), the critical \(F\) value is approximately 3.06.
06

Compare F Statistic to Critical Value

Since the calculated \(F\) statistic (2.44) is less than the critical \(F\) value (3.06), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F-statistic
The F-statistic is a crucial component of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. It helps determine if the means across different groups are significantly different from each other. The F-statistic is calculated by dividing the mean square between groups (MSTr) by the mean square error (MSE). In our example:
  • MSTr = 2673.3: This is the measure of variance between the group means.
  • MSE = 1094.2: This represents the variance within the groups, or how much the data points in each group deviate from their respective group mean.
By calculating the ratio of these two variances, we get the F-statistic: \[F = \frac{2673.3}{1094.2} \approx 2.44\]This value allows us to compare against a critical value to make a decision about the null hypothesis.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) are important in the calculation of F-statistic and its comparison against critical values. Degrees of freedom indicate the number of values that have the freedom to vary when computing a statistical estimate. For ANOVA, there are typically two relevant types of degrees of freedom:
  • Between groups (df1): This is calculated as the number of groups minus one. In our example, we have 5 groups (types of wire), so df1 = 5 - 1 = 4.
  • Within groups (df2): This involves the total number of observations minus the number of groups. With 4 samples per group and 5 groups, there are 20 total observations. Thus, df2 = 20 - 5 = 15.
Understanding degrees of freedom helps correctly determine the variability within and beyond groups, and is crucial for finding the appropriate critical value from F distribution tables.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis in an ANOVA context posits that all group means are equal, and any observed differences are due to random chance. It is symbolically represented as:\[H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 = \mu_3 = \mu_4 = \mu_5\]In practical terms, supporting the null hypothesis suggests that there is no significant difference in the tensile strengths between the different types of copper wires being tested. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) claims that at least two group means are different. Failing to reject the null hypothesis, as in this case since the calculated F is less than the critical value, suggests the data does not provide sufficient evidence that the wire types have different strengths.
Critical Value
The critical value in ANOVA is the threshold that the calculated F-statistic must exceed in order to reject the null hypothesis. It is derived from F-distribution tables based on the specified significance level (\(\alpha\)) and the degrees of freedom for both the numerator and the denominator.
  • For this problem, we use a significance level of 0.05.
  • The degrees of freedom are df1 = 4 and df2 = 15.
Using these parameters, the critical F-value is found to be approximately 3.06. A calculated F-statistic less than this critical value, as it was in our case (2.44), indicates insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Determining the critical value correctly is essential, as it guides the decision to either support or reject the initial hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Four types of mortars-ordinary cement mortar (OCM), polymer impregnated mortar (PIM), resin mortar (RM), and polymer cement mortar \((\mathrm{PCM})\)-were subjected to a compression test to measure strength (MPa). Three strength observations for each mortar type are given in the article "Polymer Mortar Composite Matrices for Maintenance-Free Highly Durable Ferrocement" (J. of Ferrocement, 1984: 337-345) and are reproduced here. Construct an ANOVA table. Using a .05 significance level, determine whether the data suggests that the true mean strength is not the same for all four mortar types. If you determine that the true mean strengths are not all equal, use Tukey's method to identify the significant differences. $$ \begin{array}{lrrr} \text { OCM } & 32.15 & 35.53 & 34.20 \\ \text { PIM } & 126.32 & 126.80 & 134.79 \\ R M & 117.91 & 115.02 & 114.58 \\ \text { PCM } & 29.09 & 30.87 & 29.80 \end{array} $$

Exercise \(10.7\) described an experiment in which 26 resistivity observations were made on each of six different concrete mixtures. The article cited there gave the following sample means: \(14.18,17.94,18.00,18.00,25.74\), 27.67. Apply Tukey's method with a simultaneous confidence level of \(95 \%\) to identify significant differences, and describe your findings (use MSE \(=13.929\) ).

An experiment to compare the spreading rates of five different brands of yellow interior latex paint available in a particular area used 4 gallons \((J=4)\) of each paint. The sample average spreading rates ( \(\left.\mathrm{ft}^{2} / \mathrm{gal}\right)\) for the five brands were \(\bar{x}_{1}=462.0, \quad \bar{x}_{2}=512.8, \quad \bar{x}_{3}=437.5\), \(\bar{x}_{4}=469.3\), and \(\bar{x}_{5}=532.1\). The computed value of \(F\) was found to be significant at level \(\alpha=.05\). With MSE \(=272.8\), use Tukey's procedure to investigate significant differences in the true average spreading rates between brands.

The lumen output was determined for each of \(I=3\) different brands of lightbulbs having the same wattage, with \(J=8\) bulbs of each brand tested. The sums of squares were computed as \(\mathrm{SSE}=4773.3\) and \(\mathrm{SSTr}=591.2\). State the hypotheses of interest (including word definitions of parameters), and use the \(F\) test of ANOVA \((\alpha=.05)\) to decide whether there are any differences in true average lumen outputs among the three brands for this type of bulb by obtaining as much information as possible about the \(P\)-value.

The article "'rigin of Precambrian Iron Formations" (Econ. Geology, 1964: 1025-1057) reports the following data on total Fe for four types of iron formation ( \(1=\) carbonate, \(2=\) silicate, \(3=\) magnetite, \(4=\) hematite). $$ \begin{array}{llllll} \text { 1: } & 20.5 & 28.1 & 27.8 & 27.0 & 28.0 \\ & 25.2 & 25.3 & 27.1 & 20.5 & 31.3 \\ \text { 2: } & 26.3 & 24.0 & 26.2 & 20.2 & 23.7 \\ & 34.0 & 17.1 & 26.8 & 23.7 & 24.9 \\ 3: & 29.5 & 34.0 & 27.5 & 29.4 & 27.9 \\ & 26.2 & 29.9 & 29.5 & 30.0 & 35.6 \\ 4: & 36.5 & 44.2 & 34.1 & 30.3 & 31.4 \\ & 33.1 & 34.1 & 32.9 & 36.3 & 25.5 \end{array} $$ Carry out an analysis of variance \(F\) test at significance level \(.01\), and summarize the results in an ANOVA table.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.