/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 69 One method for straightening wir... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

One method for straightening wire before coiling it to make a spring is called "roller straightening." The article "The Effect of Roller and Spinner Wire Straightening on Coiling Performance and Wire Properties" (Springs, 1987: 27-28) reports on the tensile properties of wire. Suppose a sample of 16 wires is selected and each is tested to determine tensile strength \(\left(\mathrm{N} / \mathrm{mm}^{2}\right)\). The resulting sample mean and standard deviation are 2160 and 30, respectively. a. The mean tensile strength for springs made using spinner straightening is \(2150 \mathrm{~N} / \mathrm{mm}^{2}\). What hypotheses should be tested to determine whether the mean tensile strength for the roller method exceeds 2150 ? b. Assuming that the tensile strength distribution is approximately normal, what test statistic would you use to test the hypotheses in part (a)? c. What is the value of the test statistic for this data? d. What is the \(P\)-value for the value of the test statistic computed in part (c)? e. For a level \(.05\) test, what conclusion would you reach?

Short Answer

Expert verified
We lack evidence to conclude roller straightening's mean strength exceeds 2150 N/mm² at \\.05 significance.

Step by step solution

01

Define Hypotheses

We need to establish the null and alternative hypotheses. In this case, we're testing if the mean tensile strength using roller straightening exceeds 2150 N/mm². Hence,- Null Hypothesis (H_0): \( \mu = 2150 \)- Alternative Hypothesis (H_a): \( \mu > 2150 \)
02

Choose the Test Statistic

Since the sample size is 16 (which is less than 30), and the population standard deviation is unknown, we use the t-test statistic for hypothesis testing with a single mean in a normally distributed population.The formula for the test statistic is:\[ t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{s/\sqrt{n}} \]where:- \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean (2160)- \( \mu_0 \) is the population mean under the null hypothesis (2150)- \( s \) is the sample standard deviation (30)- \( n \) is the sample size (16)
03

Calculate the Test Statistic

Using the test statistic formula, we substitute the given values:\[ t = \frac{2160 - 2150}{30/\sqrt{16}} = \frac{10}{7.5} \approx 1.333 \]
04

Determine the P-Value

To find the p-value, we reference the t-distribution table. With 15 degrees of freedom (n-1), we look for t = 1.333 in a one-tailed test. The p-value represents the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the observed value under the null hypothesis. Given t = 1.333, the p-value is between 0.1 and 0.05.
05

Make a Conclusion

At a significance level of 0.05, we compare the p-value from Step 4: - Since the p-value (between 0.1 and 0.05) is not less than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. - Therefore, there is not enough statistical evidence to conclude that the mean tensile strength of wire using roller straightening exceeds 2150 N/mm².

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

t-test statistic
The t-test statistic is a crucial tool used in hypothesis testing when dealing with small sample sizes and unknown population standard deviations. The purpose of the t-test is to compare the sample mean to a known value or another sample mean to assess if there are significant differences. In our scenario, the t-test helps us determine if the mean tensile strength using roller straightening exceeds the benchmark value of 2150 N/mm².

The formula for the t-test statistic is given by: \[ t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{s/\sqrt{n}} \]
  • \( \bar{x} \) represents the sample mean, which is 2160 N/mm² in this case.
  • \( \mu_0 \) is the mean under the null hypothesis, here 2150 N/mm².
  • \( s \) denotes the sample standard deviation, given as 30.
  • \( n \) is the sample size, which is 16 here.
This approach is particularly suitable when the sample size is less than 30, highlighting the power of the t-test in situations where samples are limited in number.
tensile strength
Tensile strength is an essential measure in material science used to define the maximum stress that a material can withstand while being stretched or pulled before breaking. It is particularly important for industries involved in manufacturing springs, cables, and other products requiring strong, durable materials.

In this exercise, the focus is on the tensile properties of wires that have undergone roller straightening. We're examining if this method results in a mean tensile strength that is better than spinner straightening. The strength is measured in units of force per unit area such as N/mm².

Tensile tests involve subjecting material samples to controlled tension until failure. This provides engineers and scientists with valuable data on the elasticity, plasticity, and breakage point of materials, supporting decisions on their use in various applications.
p-value
The p-value in hypothesis testing is a probability that helps us understand the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. A smaller p-value indicates stronger evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

In this context, the p-value reflects the likelihood of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the calculated t-value, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Given our calculated t-value of approximately 1.333 with 15 degrees of freedom, the p-value is between 0.1 and 0.05 for a one-tailed test.
  • A p-value closer to 0 implies strong evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that the alternative hypothesis might be true.
  • If the p-value is large, it suggests that there is insignificant evidence against the null hypothesis.
Understanding p-values is vital for making informed decisions about the hypotheses in any empirical research, ensuring the results are statistically sound.
significance level
The significance level, often denoted by \( \alpha \), is a threshold chosen by researchers to decide when to reject the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis, known as a Type I error.
  • A common choice for significance levels is 0.05 or 5%, meaning that there is a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none.
  • By selecting the significance level before performing the test, researchers set a clear benchmark for decision-making.
In the exercise, the significance level is set at 0.05. When comparing this level to the p-value obtained (between 0.1 and 0.05), we find that the p-value is not lower than 0.05, thus failing to reject the null hypothesis.

This conclusion indicates that there is not enough statistical evidence to assert that the roller straightening method results in higher tensile strength than the spinner method.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The accompanying observations on residual flame time (sec) for strips of treated children's nightwear were given in the article "An Introduction to Some Precision and Accuracy of Measurement Problems" ( \(J\). of Testing and Eval., 1982: 132-140). Suppose a true average flame time of at most \(9.75\) had been mandated. Does the data suggest that this condition has not been met? Carry out an appropriate test after first investigating the plausibility of assumptions that underlie your method of inference. $$ \begin{array}{lllllll} 9.85 & 9.93 & 9.75 & 9.77 & 9.67 & 9.87 & 9.67 \\ 9.94 & 9.85 & 9.75 & 9.83 & 9.92 & 9.74 & 9.99 \\ 9.88 & 9.95 & 9.95 & 9.93 & 9.92 & 9.89 & \end{array} $$

The article referenced in Example \(8.11\) also reported that in a sample of 106 wine consumers, \(22(20.8 \%)\) thought that screw tops were an acceptable substitute for natural corks. Suppose a particular winery decided to use screw tops for one of its wines unless there was strong evidence to suggest that fewer than \(25 \%\) of wine consumers found this acceptable. a. Using a significance level of \(.10\), what would you recommend to the winery? b. For the hypotheses tested in (a), describe in context what the type I and II errors would be, and say which type of error might have been committed.

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) denote a random sample from a normal population distribution with a known value of \(\sigma\). a. For testing the hypotheses \(H_{0}: \mu=\mu_{0}\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu>\mu_{0}\) (where \(\mu_{0}\) is a fixed number), show that the test with test statistic \(\bar{X}\) and rejection region \(\bar{x} \geq \mu_{0}+2.33 \sigma / \sqrt{n}\) has significance level \(.01\). b. Suppose the procedure of part (a) is used to test \(H_{0}: \mu \leq \mu_{0}\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu>\mu_{0}\). If \(\mu_{0}=100, n=25\), and \(\sigma=5\), what is the probability of committing a type I error when \(\mu=99\) ? When \(\mu=98\) ? In general, what can be said about the probability of a type I error when the actual value of \(\mu\) is less than \(\mu_{0}\) ? Verify your assertion.

The article "Orchard Floor Management Utilizing SoilApplied Coal Dust for Frost Protection" (Agri. and Forest Meteorology, 1988: 71-82) reports the following values for soil heat flux of eight plots covered with coal dust. \(\begin{array}{llllllll}34.7 & 35.4 & 34.7 & 37.7 & 32.5 & 28.0 & 18.4 & 24.9\end{array}\) The mean soil heat flux for plots covered only with grass is 29.0. Assuming that the heat-flux distribution is approximately normal, does the data suggest that the coal dust is effective in increasing the mean heat flux over that for grass? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\).

Have you ever been frustrated because you could not get a container of some sort to release the last bit of its contents? The article "Shake, Rattle, and Squeeze: How Much Is Left in That Container?" (Consumer Reports, May 2009: 8) reported on an investigation of this issue for various consumer products. Suppose five \(6.0 \mathrm{oz}\) tubes of toothpaste of a particular brand are randomly selected and squeezed until no more toothpaste will come out. Then each tube is cut open and the amount remaining is weighed, resulting in the following data (consistent with what the cited article reported): \(.53, .65, .46, .50, .37\). Does it appear that the true average amount left is less than \(10 \%\) of the advertised net contents? a. Check the validity of any assumptions necessary for testing the appropriate hypotheses. b. Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). Would your conclusion change if a significance level of .01 had been used? c. Describe in context type I and II errors, and say which error might have been made in reaching a conclusion.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.