/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 59 The accompanying data on cube co... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The accompanying data on cube compressive strength (MPa) of concrete specimens appeared in the article "Experimental Study of Recycled Rubber-Filled HighStrength Concrete" (Magazine of Concrete Res., 2009: \(549-556)\) \(\begin{array}{rrrrr}112.3 & 97.0 & 92.7 & 86.0 & 102.0 \\ 99.2 & 95.8 & 103.5 & 89.0 & 86.7\end{array}\) a. Is it plausible that the compressive strength for this type of concrete is normally distributed? b. Suppose the concrete will be used for a particular application unless there is strong evidence that true average strength is less than \(100 \mathrm{MPa}\). Should the concrete be used? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses using the \(P\)-value method.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Concrete can be used; there's no strong evidence that the average strength is less than 100 MPa.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Descriptive Statistics

First, calculate the sample mean \( \bar{x} \) and the sample standard deviation \( s \). The data set is: 112.3, 97.0, 92.7, 86.0, 102.0, 99.2, 95.8, 103.5, 89.0, 86.7.\\[\bar{x} = \frac{112.3 + 97.0 + 92.7 + 86.0 + 102.0 + 99.2 + 95.8 + 103.5 + 89.0 + 86.7}{10} = 96.42\] \\(s = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1}} = 8.26\text{ MPa}.\)
02

Normality Check

Assess the normality by conducting a visual inspection with a histogram or Q-Q plot. If not possible, consider that concrete strength data are generally normally distributed in practice due to central limit theorem considerations when the sample size is small.
03

State Hypotheses

We are testing if the true average compressive strength is less than 100 MPa. The hypotheses are:\\(H_{0}: \mu = 100 \, \text{MPa}\) \\(H_{a}: \mu < 100 \, \text{MPa}\)
04

Calculate Test Statistic

Use the formula for the t-test statistic: \\[ t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{s/\sqrt{n}} \] \where \(\mu_0 = 100\), \(\bar{x} = 96.42\), \(s = 8.26\), and \(n = 10\). \\[ t = \frac{96.42 - 100}{8.26/\sqrt{10}} = -1.38 \]
05

Determine P-Value

Find the p-value for the calculated t-statistic \(-1.38\) using a t-distribution with \(n-1 = 9\) degrees of freedom. The p-value is approximately 0.10.
06

Make Decision

The p-value (0.10) is greater than a typical significance level (0.05). Therefore, we do not reject the null hypothesis.
07

Conclusion

There is insufficient evidence to conclude the true average compressive strength is less than 100 MPa. Hence, the concrete can be used for the application.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Compressive Strength
Compressive strength is a key property of materials, particularly in construction, as it measures how much load a material can withstand when compressed. For concrete, compressive strength is a crucial factor, since it indicates the material's capacity to bear loads without cracking or failing. It's typically measured in megapascals (MPa). For the given exercise, researchers aim to determine if the compressive strength of a particular type of concrete meets specific standards.
A high compressive strength means the concrete can bear substantial weights, making it suitable for building and construction projects.
  • High MPa value: indicates greater compressive strength
  • Low MPa value: signals potential issues with durability
In the original exercise, the average compressive strength was calculated to conduct further statistical analyses, like hypothesis testing, to ensure the material meets the necessary safety and performance standards.
T-Test
The t-test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the mean of a sample and a known value or another sample mean. In the context of hypothesis testing, the t-test helps assess whether the concrete's compressive strength differs significantly from a specified standard (in this case, 100 MPa).
The t-test involves calculating the t-statistic, a value that indicates how far the sample mean is from the hypothesized population mean, in units of standard errors. The formula used is:\[ t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{s/\sqrt{n}} \]
  • \(\bar{x}\): sample mean
  • \(\mu_0\): hypothesized population mean (100 MPa here)
  • \(s\): sample standard deviation
  • \(n\): sample size
In this exercise, the calculated t-statistic was -1.38, which is used to find the p-value and make informed decisions regarding the hypothesis.
Normality Check
A normality check evaluates whether the data follows a normal distribution, which is essential for many statistical methods, including the t-test, used in hypothesis testing. In the exercise, a normality check helps ensure that the sample of compressive strength measurements can be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
There are several ways to assess normality:
  • Visual methods like histograms and Q-Q plots: These provide a visual representation of data and how closely it resembles a normal distribution.
  • Statistical tests: Such as the Shapiro-Wilk test or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, which provide objective numerical measures.
The given solution relies on understanding that concrete strength data often inherently follow a normal distribution due to the central limit theorem, especially with small sample sizes.
P-Value
The p-value is a vital concept in hypothesis testing. It indicates the probability of observing test results as extreme as those observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A low p-value suggests that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis, leading to its rejection.
In hypothesis testing, decisions are often made based on the p-value in comparison to a significance level (\(\alpha\)). Common significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, etc. If the p-value is less than or equal to \(\alpha\), the null hypothesis is rejected.
In the given exercise, the calculated p-value was 0.10, which is higher than the typical significance level of 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis (\(H_0: \mu = 100 \text{ MPa}\)) was not rejected. This indicates insufficient evidence to claim that the true average compressive strength is less than 100 MPa, resulting in the concrete being deemed acceptable for use.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A random sample of 150 recent donations at a certain blood bank reveals that 82 were type A blood. Does this suggest that the actual percentage of type A donations differs from \(40 \%\), the percentage of the population having type A blood? Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\). Would your conclusion have been different if a significance level of \(.05\) had been used?

A random sample of soil specimens was obtained, and the amount of organic matter \((\%)\) in the soil was determined for each specimen, resulting in the accompanying data (from "Engineering Properties of Soil," Soil Science, 1998: 93-102). $$ \begin{array}{llllllll} 1.10 & 5.09 & 0.97 & 1.59 & 4.60 & 0.32 & 0.55 & 1.45 \\ 0.14 & 4.47 & 1.20 & 3.50 & 5.02 & 4.67 & 5.22 & 2.69 \\ 3.98 & 3.17 & 3.03 & 2.21 & 0.69 & 4.47 & 3.31 & 1.17 \\ 0.76 & 1.17 & 1.57 & 2.62 & 1.66 & 2.05 & & \end{array} $$ The values of the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and (estimated) standard error of the mean are \(2.481,1.616\), and \(.295\), respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is something other than \(3 \%\) ? Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses at significance level 10 by first determining the \(P\)-value. Would your conclusion be different if \(\alpha=.05\) had been used? [Note: A normal probability plot of the data shows an acceptable pattern in light of the reasonably large sample size.]

An article in the Nov. 11,2005 , issue of the San Luis Obispo Tribune reported that researchers making random purchases at California Wal-Mart stores found scanners coming up with the wrong price \(8.3 \%\) of the time. Suppose this was based on 200 purchases. The National Institute for Standards and Technology says that in the long run at most two out of every 100 items should have incorrectly scanned prices. a. Develop a test procedure with a significance level of (approximately) .05, and then carry out the test to decide whether the NIST benchmark is not satisfied. b. For the test procedure you employed in (a), what is the probability of deciding that the NIST benchmark has been satisfied when in fact the mistake rate is \(5 \%\) ?

The desired percentage of \(\mathrm{SiO}_{2}\) in a certain type of aluminous cement is \(5.5\). To test whether the true average percentage is \(5.5\) for a particular production facility, 16 independently obtained samples are analyzed. Suppose that the percentage of \(\mathrm{SiO}_{2}\) in a sample is normally distributed with \(\sigma=.3\) and that \(\bar{x}=5.25\). a. Does this indicate conclusively that the true average percentage differs from \(5.5\) ? Carry out the analysis using the sequence of steps suggested in the text. b. If the true average percentage is \(\mu=5.6\) and a level \(\alpha=.01\) test based on \(n=16\) is used, what is the probability of detecting this departure from \(H_{0}\) ? c. What value of \(n\) is required to satisfy \(\alpha=.01\) and \(\beta(5.6)=.01 ?\)

Have you ever been frustrated because you could not get a container of some sort to release the last bit of its contents? The article "Shake, Rattle, and Squeeze: How Much Is Left in That Container?" (Consumer Reports, May 2009: 8) reported on an investigation of this issue for various consumer products. Suppose five \(6.0 \mathrm{oz}\) tubes of toothpaste of a particular brand are randomly selected and squeezed until no more toothpaste will come out. Then each tube is cut open and the amount remaining is weighed, resulting in the following data (consistent with what the cited article reported): \(.53, .65, .46, .50, .37\). Does it appear that the true average amount left is less than \(10 \%\) of the advertised net contents? a. Check the validity of any assumptions necessary for testing the appropriate hypotheses. b. Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). Would your conclusion change if a significance level of .01 had been used? c. Describe in context type I and II errors, and say which error might have been made in reaching a conclusion.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.