/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 47 For which of the given \(P\)-val... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For which of the given \(P\)-values would the null hypothesis be rejected when performing a level .05 test? a. \(.001\) b. \(.021\) c. \(.078\) d. \(.047\) e. \(.148\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The null hypothesis is rejected for p-values 0.001, 0.021, and 0.047.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Rejection Criterion

In hypothesis testing, if the calculated p-value is less than the level of significance (often denoted as \(\alpha\)), the null hypothesis is rejected. For this problem, \(\alpha = 0.05\). Therefore, any p-value less than 0.05 indicates the null hypothesis should be rejected.
02

Compare Each P-value to 0.05

Examine each p-value provided in the problem and compare it to the level of significance (0.05) to determine if the null hypothesis should be rejected.- a. \(0.001 < 0.05\) ⇒ Null hypothesis is rejected.- b. \(0.021 < 0.05\) ⇒ Null hypothesis is rejected.- c. \(0.078 > 0.05\) ⇒ Null hypothesis is not rejected.- d. \(0.047 < 0.05\) ⇒ Null hypothesis is rejected.- e. \(0.148 > 0.05\) ⇒ Null hypothesis is not rejected.
03

List All Rejected Cases

Based on the comparisons in Step 2, identify which p-values lead to the rejection of the null hypothesis:The p-values of \(0.001\), \(0.021\), and \(0.047\) lead to rejection of the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding P-value
The p-value is a fundamental concept in statistics and hypothesis testing. It helps us determine the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. When conducting statistical tests, the p-value indicates the probability of obtaining a result as extreme as the one observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. In simple terms, a lower p-value suggests stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
  • A small p-value (typically ≤ 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, leading us to reject it.
  • A large p-value (> 0.05) suggests weak evidence against the null hypothesis, so we fail to reject it.
Understanding the p-value helps in determining whether the observed data significantly deviates from what was expected under the null hypothesis. It’s like a measure of surprise — the smaller the p-value, the more surprised we are by our data if the null hypothesis were true.
Level of Significance
The level of significance, denoted as \(\alpha\), is a threshold set by researchers before conducting a hypothesis test. This value determines how much evidence is required to reject the null hypothesis. It essentially marks the cutoff point for determining whether a result is statistically significant.
Consider \(\alpha = 0.05\), which is a common choice in many fields. By setting this criteria, researchers have decided that only results with a 5% probability of occurring by chance (when the null hypothesis is true) are surprising enough to reject the null hypothesis.
  • A lower \(\alpha\) level (like 0.01) means stricter criteria for rejecting the null hypothesis, thus reducing the risk of a Type I error (false positive).
  • Conversely, a higher \(\alpha\) level (like 0.10) reduces the burden of proof, increasing the risk of a Type I error.
The level of significance is chosen before the study to prevent bias in testing and provides a rational basis for hypothesis evaluation.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical technique used to make decisions or inferences about populations based on sample data. It involves a structured process that hinges on the formulation of a null hypothesis (H_0) and an alternative hypothesis (H_aor H_1).
Here's the typical flow of hypothesis testing:
  • Null Hypothesis (H_0): This is the hypothesis that there is no effect or difference. It's the presumption that any observed effect or difference is due to chance.
  • Alternative Hypothesis (H_a): Opposes the null and represents the hypothesis that there is an effect or a difference.
  • Conduct a suitable test to calculate the p-value.
  • Compare the p-value with the level of significance to make a decision. If the p-value is smaller than \(\alpha\), reject H_0. Otherwise, fail to reject H_0.If rejecting H_0, it suggests supporting evidence for H_a.
The goal of hypothesis testing is not to "prove" the null hypothesis but to assess the evidence against it provided by the sample data.
Significance Level 0.05
Setting the significance level at 0.05 is quite common across various research fields, as it strikes a balance between making Type I errors (false positives) and Type II errors (false negatives).
  • Type I Error: Occurs when we incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis. Using a significance level of 0.05 means we are willing to accept a 5% risk of such an error.
  • Type II Error: Happens when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. Ensuring this error is minimized while keeping \(\alpha = 0.05\) can require larger sample sizes or modifying experimental conditions.
The choice of 0.05 provides a reasonable threshold for determining statistical significance without being overly strict or lenient. This balance allows for robust research findings that are less likely to be due to random chance.In the context of a test with \(\alpha = 0.05\), the null hypothesis will be rejected for p-values less than 0.05, indicating enough evidence to consider the alternative hypothesis instead.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Annual holdings turnover for a mutual fund is the percentage of a fund's assets that are sold during a particular year. Generally speaking, a fund with a low value of turnover is more stable and risk averse, whereas a high value of turnover indicates a substantial amount of buying and selling in an attempt to take advantage of short-term market fluctuations. Here are values of turnover for a sample of 20 large-cap blended funds (refer to Exercise \(1.53\) for a bit more information) extracted from Morningstar.com: \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}1.03 & 1.23 & 1.10 & 1.64 & 1.30 & 1.27 & 1.25 & 0.78 & 1.05 & 0.64 \\ 0.94 & 2.86 & 1.05 & 0.75 & 0.09 & 0.79 & 1.61 & 1.26 & 0.93 & 0.84\end{array}\) a. Would you use the one-sample \(t\) test to decide whether there is compelling evidence for concluding that the population mean turnover is less than \(100 \%\) ? Explain. b. A normal probability plot of the \(20 \ln\) (turnover) values shows a very pronounced linear pattern, suggesting it is reasonable to assume that the turnover distribution is lognormal. Recall that \(X\) has a lognormal distribution if \(\ln (X)\) is normally distributed with mean value \(\mu\) and variance \(\sigma^{2}\). Because \(\mu\) is also the median of the \(\ln (X)\) distribution, \(e^{\mu}\) is the median of the \(X\) distribution. Use this information to decide whether there is compelling evidence for concluding that the median of the turnover population distribution is less than \(100 \%\).

Scientists think that robots will play a crucial role in factories in the next several decades. Suppose that in an experiment to determine whether the use of robots to weave computer cables is feasible, a robot was used to assemble 500 cables. The cables were examined and there were 15 defectives. If human assemblers have a defect rate of \(.035\) \((3.5 \%)\), does this data support the hypothesis that the proportion of defectives is lower for robots than for humans? Use a .01 significance level.

Each of a group of 20 intermediate tennis players is given two rackets, one having nylon strings and the other synthetic gut strings. After several weeks of playing with the two rackets, each player will be asked to state a preference for one of the two types of strings. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of all such players who would prefer gut to nylon, and let \(X\) be the number of players in the sample who prefer gut. Because gut strings are more expensive, consider the null hypothesis that at most \(50 \%\) of all such players prefer gut. We simplify this to \(H_{0}: p=.5\), planning to reject \(H_{0}\) only if sample evidence strongly favors gut strings. a. Which of the rejection regions \(\\{15,16,17,18,19,20\\}\), \(\\{0,1,2,3,4,5\\}\), or \(\\{0,1,2,3,17,18,19,20\\}\) is most appropriate, and why are the other two not appropriate? b. What is the probability of a type I error for the chosen region of part (a)? Does the region specify a level \(.05\) test? Is it the best level .05 test? c. If \(60 \%\) of all enthusiasts prefer gut, calculate the probability of a type II error using the appropriate region from part (a). Repeat if \(80 \%\) of all enthusiasts prefer gut. d. If 13 out of the 20 players prefer gut, should \(H_{0}\) be rejected using a significance level of .10?

When \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) are independent Poisson variables, each with parameter \(\mu\), and \(n\) is large, the sample mean \(\bar{X}\) has approximately a normal distribution with \(\mu=E(\bar{X})\) and \(V(\bar{X})=\mu / n\). This implies that $$ Z=\frac{\bar{X}-\mu}{\sqrt{\mu / n}} $$ has approximately a standard normal distribution. For testing \(H_{0}: \mu=\mu_{0}\), we can replace \(\mu\) by \(\mu_{0}\) in the equation for \(Z\) to obtain a test statistic. This statistic is actually preferred to the large- sample statistic with denominator \(S / \sqrt{n}\) (when the \(X_{i}\) 's are Poisson) because it is tailored explicitly to the Poisson assumption. If the number of requests for consulting received by a certain statistician during a 5-day work week has a Poisson distribution and the total number of consulting requests during a 36-week period is 160 , does this suggest that the true average number of weekly requests exceeds 4.0? Test using \(\alpha=.02\).

A hot-tub manufacturer advertises that with its heating equipment, a temperature of \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) can be achieved in at most \(15 \mathrm{~min}\). A random sample of 42 tubs is selected, and the time necessary to achieve a \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) temperature is determined for each tub. The sample average time and sample standard deviation are \(16.5 \mathrm{~min}\) and \(2.2 \mathrm{~min}\), respectively. Does this data cast doubt on the company's claim? Compute the \(P\)-value and use it to reach a conclusion at level .05.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.