/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 For the following pairs of asser... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For the following pairs of assertions, indicate which do not comply with our rules for setting up hypotheses and why (the subscripts 1 and 2 differentiate between quantities for two different populations or samples): a. \(H_{0}: \mu=100, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu>100\) b. \(H_{0}: \sigma=20, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \sigma \leq 20\) c. \(H_{0}: p \neq .25, H_{\mathrm{a}}: p=.25\) d. \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=25, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>100\) e. \(H_{0}: S_{1}^{2}=S_{2}^{2}, H_{\mathrm{a}}: S_{1}^{2} \neq S_{2}^{2}\) f. \(H_{0}: \mu=120, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu=150\) g. \(H_{0}: \sigma_{1} / \sigma_{2}=1, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \sigma_{1} / \sigma_{2} \neq 1\) h. \(H_{0}: p_{1}-p_{2}=-.1, H_{\mathrm{a}}: p_{1}-p_{2}<-.1\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
b, c, d, and f do not comply with the rules for setting up hypotheses.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Hypotheses Rules

Hypotheses should be testable statements about a population parameter. The null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is typically a statement of no effect or difference, and the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}\) is what you aim to provide evidence for. \(H_{0}\) should not contain inequality signs such as ‘≠’, ‘<’, or ‘>’ in its form, whereas \(H_{a}\) often does.
02

Analyze Assertion (a)

Assertion (a) \(H_{0}: \mu=100, H_{a}: \mu>100\) is correctly set up. \(H_{0}\) has an equal sign, and \(H_{a}\) is an inequality.
03

Analyze Assertion (b)

Assertion (b) \(H_{0}: \sigma=20, H_{a}: \sigma \leq 20\) is incorrect. Although \(H_{0}\) uses '=', \(H_{a}\) incorrectly uses '<=' where a strict inequality should be used, i.e., \(\sigma < 20\).
04

Analyze Assertion (c)

Assertion (c) \(H_{0}: p eq .25, H_{a}: p=.25\) is incorrect. The \(H_{0}\) should not be in the form of \(eq\); this should instead reflect no difference or a default state, such as \(H_{0}: p=.25\).
05

Analyze Assertion (d)

Assertion (d) \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=25, H_{a}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>100\) is incorrect. The \(H_{a}\) should reflect a plausible alternative hypothesis related to the \(H_{0}\); i.e., it should examine \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) > 25 or not equal to 25, not greater than 100, which seems arbitrary and unattainable directly from \(H_{0}\).
06

Analyze Assertion (e)

Assertion (e) \(H_{0}: S_{1}^{2}=S_{2}^{2}, H_{a}: S_{1}^{2} eq S_{2}^{2}\) is correctly set up. The null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) reflects no difference (equal), and the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}\) suggests a possible difference.
07

Analyze Assertion (f)

Assertion (f) \(H_{0}: \mu=120, H_{a}: \mu=150\) is incorrect. Hypotheses should not claim equal specific values for both null and alternative. They should rather involve \(H_{a}\) as \(\mu eq 120\), \(\mu > 120\), or \(\mu < 120\).
08

Analyze Assertion (g)

Assertion (g) \(H_{0}: \sigma_{1} / \sigma_{2}=1, H_{a}: \sigma_{1} / \sigma_{2} eq 1\) is correctly set up. The null hypothesis reflects equality, and the alternative hypothesis suggests inequality.
09

Analyze Assertion (h)

Assertion (h) \(H_{0}: p_{1}-p_{2}=-.1, H_{a}: p_{1}-p_{2}<-.1\) is correctly set up with \(H_{0}\) suggesting a specific difference (equality form) and \(H_{a}\) using a strict inequality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_{0}\), is a statement that assumes no effect or no difference in a population parameter. Essentially, it acts as the default or status quo assumption. For instance, you might suggest that there is no difference between the average scores of two groups, resulting in a null hypothesis of \(H_{0}: \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0\). This indicates that the means of the two populations are equal.

When creating a null hypothesis, it's important to use an equality sign '='. This is because the null hypothesis essentially proposes that there's no significant relationship or effect. Violating this rule, such as using '≠', '<', or '>', deviates from the standard practice of formulating \(H_{0}\).

The null hypothesis serves as a baseline situation, and it is what you test against with the alternative hypothesis. It is often assumed to be true until evidence suggests otherwise, much like the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" in court. So, while setting up your hypotheses, ensuring that \(H_{0}\) is correctly formatted is crucial.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, represented by \(H_{a}\), is what researchers aim to support. It contradicts the null hypothesis and suggests the presence of an effect or a difference. Unlike the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis typically involves inequalities or non-equality statements like '≠', '<', or '>'.

For example, if you're examining whether one teaching method is better than another, your alternative hypothesis might be \(H_{a}: \mu_1 > \mu_2\). Here, \(H_{a}\) suggests that the mean of the first group's scores is greater than the second group's scores.

Alternative hypotheses can be one-tailed or two-tailed.
  • One-tailed involves directional claims, like \(\mu > 100\) or \(\mu < 100\).
  • Two-tailed does not specify direction, indicated by \(\mu eq 100\).
Choosing the correct form for your \(H_{a}\) is essential, as it influences the direction and focus of your statistical test. Essentially, the alternative hypothesis is what you are trying to find evidence for in your study.
Population Parameter
In statistics, a population parameter is a characteristic or measure describing an aspect of an entire population. Population parameters include things like population mean (\(\mu\)), population standard deviation (\(\sigma\)), and population proportion (\(p\)). They are usually unknown and are estimated through the analysis of sample data.

Understanding population parameters is crucial because hypothesis testing revolves around making inferences about these parameters based on sample data. When you establish your null and alternative hypotheses, you're usually attempting to make a claim about a population parameter. For instance, \(H_{0}: \mu = 100\) is suggesting something about the population mean.

While we can never measure an entire population in practice, population parameters give us a target for what we are trying to estimate from sample statistics. Sampling methods and statistical analyses are all designed to accurately infer or predict these parameters with a measurable degree of accuracy and confidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The sample average unrestrained compressive strength for 45 specimens of a particular type of brick was computed to be \(3107 \mathrm{psi}\), and the sample standard deviation was 188 . The distribution of unrestrained compressive strength may be somewhat skewed. Does the data strongly indicate that the true average unrestrained compressive strength is less than the design value of 3200 ? Test using \(\alpha=.001\).

A regular type of laminate is currently being used by a manufacturer of circuit boards. A special laminate has been developed to reduce warpage. The regular laminate will be used on one sample of specimens and the special laminate on another sample, and the amount of warpage will then be determined for each specimen. The manufacturer will then switch to the special laminate only if it can be demonstrated that the true average amount of warpage for that laminate is less than for the regular laminate. State the relevant hypotheses, and describe the type I and type II errors in the context of this situation.

Annual holdings turnover for a mutual fund is the percentage of a fund's assets that are sold during a particular year. Generally speaking, a fund with a low value of turnover is more stable and risk averse, whereas a high value of turnover indicates a substantial amount of buying and selling in an attempt to take advantage of short-term market fluctuations. Here are values of turnover for a sample of 20 large-cap blended funds (refer to Exercise \(1.53\) for a bit more information) extracted from Morningstar.com: \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}1.03 & 1.23 & 1.10 & 1.64 & 1.30 & 1.27 & 1.25 & 0.78 & 1.05 & 0.64 \\ 0.94 & 2.86 & 1.05 & 0.75 & 0.09 & 0.79 & 1.61 & 1.26 & 0.93 & 0.84\end{array}\) a. Would you use the one-sample \(t\) test to decide whether there is compelling evidence for concluding that the population mean turnover is less than \(100 \%\) ? Explain. b. A normal probability plot of the \(20 \ln\) (turnover) values shows a very pronounced linear pattern, suggesting it is reasonable to assume that the turnover distribution is lognormal. Recall that \(X\) has a lognormal distribution if \(\ln (X)\) is normally distributed with mean value \(\mu\) and variance \(\sigma^{2}\). Because \(\mu\) is also the median of the \(\ln (X)\) distribution, \(e^{\mu}\) is the median of the \(X\) distribution. Use this information to decide whether there is compelling evidence for concluding that the median of the turnover population distribution is less than \(100 \%\).

A new design for the braking system on a certain type of car has been proposed. For the current system, the true average braking distance at \(40 \mathrm{mph}\) under specified conditions is known to be \(120 \mathrm{ft}\). It is proposed that the new design be implemented only if sample data strongly indicates a reduction in true average braking distance for the new design. a. Define the parameter of interest and state the relevant hypotheses. b. Suppose braking distance for the new system is normally distributed with \(\sigma=10\). Let \(\bar{X}\) denote the sample average braking distance for a random sample of 36 observations. Which of the following three rejection regions is appropriate: \(R_{1}=\\{\bar{x}: \bar{x} \geq 124.80\\}, \quad R_{2}=\\{\bar{x}: \bar{x} \leq 115.20\\}\), \(R_{3}=\\{\bar{x}\) : either \(\bar{x} \geq 125.13\) or \(\bar{x} \leq 114.87\\}\) ? c. What is the significance level for the appropriate region of part (b)? How would you change the region to obtain a test with \(\alpha=.001\) ? d. What is the probability that the new design is not implemented when its true average braking distance is actually \(115 \mathrm{ft}\) and the appropriate region from part (b) is used? e. Let \(Z=(\bar{X}-120) /(\sigma / \sqrt{n})\). What is the significance level for the rejection region \(\\{z: z \leq-2.33\\}\) ? For the region \(\\{z: z \leq-2.88\\}\) ?

The recommended daily dietary allowance for zinc among males older than age 50 years is \(15 \mathrm{mg} /\) day. The article "Nutrient Intakes and Dietary Patterns of Older Americans: A National Study" (J. of Gerontology, 1992: M145-150) reports the following summary data on intake for a sample of males age \(65-74\) years: \(n=115, \bar{x}=11.3\), and \(s=6.43\). Does this data indicate that average daily zinc intake in the population of all males ages \(65-74\) falls below the recommended allowance?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.