/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 76 In October, 1994, a flaw in a ce... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In October, 1994, a flaw in a certain Pentium chip installed in computers was discovered that could result in a wrong answer when performing a division. The manufacturer initially claimed that the chance of any particular division being incorrect was only 1 in 9 billion, so that it would take thousands of years before a typical user encountered a mistake. However, statisticians are not typical users; some modern statistical techniques are so computationally intensive that a billion divisions over a short time period is not outside the realm of possibility. Assuming that the 1 in 9 billion figure is correct and that results of different divisions are independent of one another, what is the probability that at least one error occurs in one billion divisions with this chip?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The probability of at least one error in one billion divisions is approximately 10.52%.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Parameters

Let's denote the probability of a single division being incorrect as \( p \). According to the problem, \( p = \frac{1}{9,000,000,000} \). We want to find the probability that there is at least one error in one billion divisions.
02

Apply Complement Rule

To find the probability of at least one error, we'll use the complement rule. First, calculate the probability of no errors. The probability of a correct division is \( 1-p = \frac{8,999,999,999}{9,000,000,000} \). For one billion independent divisions, the probability that all divisions are correct (i.e., no errors) is \( \left(1-p\right)^{1,000,000,000} \).
03

Calculate Probability of No Errors

Calculate \( \left(1-p\right)^{1,000,000,000} \) using the approximation for small \( p \), which is \( e^{-np} \), where \( n \) is the number of trials and \( p \) the probability of error in one trial. Thus, \( e^{-1,000,000,000 \times \frac{1}{9,000,000,000}} = e^{-\frac{1}{9}} \).
04

Find Probability of at Least One Error

Use the complement rule to determine the probability of at least one error: \( 1 - e^{-\frac{1}{9}} \). Calculating this gives approximately \( 1 - 0.8948 \approx 0.1052 \).
05

Conclusion

The probability that at least one error occurs in one billion divisions is approximately 0.1052, or 10.52%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Complement Rule
In probability theory, the complement rule is a simple yet powerful tool to solve many problems with ease. This concept is all about working backwards.
Instead of directly calculating the probability of an event, we find the probability of it not happening and subtract it from 1.

For example, it might be tough to calculate the likelihood of getting at least one error in a billion computer operations. However, it is much easier to find the probability of no errors at all.
The complement rule tells us that the probability of at least one error is equal to one minus the probability of no errors.
  • If the chance of an error in a single operation is tiny, as in our original problem, we use: \( \text{Probability of at least one error} = 1 - P(\text{no errors in } n \text{ trials}) \).
Understanding and using the complement can save you from tedious calculations and open a clearer path to your answer.
Independent Events
When events are considered independent, the result of one does not affect the outcome of the other.
In the context of our original problem, each computer division is treated as an independent event.
  • This means that whether one division results in an error does not impact the likelihood of subsequent divisions erring.
To calculate the probability for such scenarios, you multiply the probabilities of individual events.

For instance, to find the probability that no errors occur in a sequence of divisions, you multiply the probability of a correct result (one minus the error probability) for each division:
\( P(\text{no errors in } n \text{ trials}) = (1-p)^n \).

Understanding the concept of independent events is crucial in the realm of probability, as it frequently simplifies problems by allowing calculations one step at a time.
Approximation Techniques
Approximation techniques are incredibly useful when dealing with complex or large calculations in probability.
In our problem, the error probability is so small, and the number of trials so large, that directly calculating \( (1-p)^n \) becomes unwieldy.
  • Here, an approximation method known as the exponential approximation is used, specifically \( e^{-np} \).
This stems from a fundamental result in probability, where when \( p \) is extremely small and \( n \) is large, \( (1-p)^n \) can be approximated by an exponent:
\( e^{-np} = e^{\text(Some small value close to zero)} \).

This simplification is derived from calculus and exponential functions providing smoother calculations involving vast numbers and extremely tiny probabilities.

This technique not only makes complex computations manageable but also illustrates how theory meets practical application in statistics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that \(\left(\begin{array}{l}n \\\ k\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\ n-k\end{array}\right)\). Give an interpretation involving subsets.

Show that for any three events \(A, B\), and \(C\) with \(P(C)>0\), \(P(A \cup B \mid C)=P(A \mid C)+P(B \mid C)-P(A \cap B \mid C) .\)

An insurance company offers four different deductible levels-none, low, medium, and high-for its homeowner's policyholders and three different levels- low, medium, and high-for its automobile policyholders. The accompanying table gives proportions for the various categories of policyholders who have both types of insurance. For example, the proportion of individuals with both low homeowner's deductible and low auto deductible is .06 (6\% of all such individuals). $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} & {}{}{\text { Homeowner's }} \\ { } \text { Auto } & \mathbf{N} & \mathbf{L} & \mathbf{M} & \mathbf{H} \\ \hline \mathbf{L} & .04 & .06 & .05 & .03 \\ \mathbf{M} & .07 & .10 & .20 & .10 \\ \mathbf{H} & .02 & .03 & .15 & .15 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Suppose an individual having both types of policies is randomly selected. a. What is the probability that the individual has a medium auto deductible and a high homeowner's deductible? b. What is the probability that the individual has a low auto deductible? A low homeowner's deductible? c. What is the probability that the individual is in the same category for both auto and homeowner's deductibles? d. Based on your answer in part (c), what is the probability that the two categories are different? e. What is the probability that the individual has at least one low deductible level? f. Using the answer in part (e), what is the probability that neither deductible level is low?

A company uses three different assembly lines- \(A_{1}, A_{2}\), and \(A_{3}\)-to manufacture a particular component. Of those manufactured by line \(A_{1}, 5 \%\) need rework to remedy a defect, whereas \(8 \%\) of \(A_{2}\) 's components need rework and \(10 \%\) of \(A_{3}\) 's need rework. Suppose that \(50 \%\) of all components are produced by line \(A_{1}, 30 \%\) are produced by line \(A_{2}\), and \(20 \%\) come from line \(A_{3}\). If a randomly selected component needs rework, what is the probability that it came from line \(A_{1}\) ? From line \(A_{2}\) ? From line \(A_{3}\) ?

A certain system can experience three different types of defects. Let \(A_{i}(i=1,2,3)\) denote the event that the system has a defect of type \(i\). Suppose that $$ \begin{aligned} &P\left(A_{1}\right)=.12 \quad P\left(A_{2}\right)=.07 \quad P\left(A_{3}\right)=.05 \\ &P\left(A_{1} \cup A_{2}\right)=.13 \quad P\left(A_{1} \cup A_{3}\right)=.14 \\\ &P\left(A_{2} \cup A_{3}\right)=.10 \quad P\left(A_{1} \cap A_{2} \cap A_{3}\right)=.01 \end{aligned} $$ a. What is the probability that the system does not have a type 1 defect? b. What is the probability that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects? c. What is the probability that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects but not a type 3 defect? d. What is the probability that the system has at most two of these defects?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.