/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 112 Consider four independent events... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider four independent events \(A_{1}, A_{2}, A_{3}\), and \(A_{4}\), and let \(p_{i}=P\left(A_{i}\right)\) for \(i=1,2,3,4\). Express the probability that at least one of these four events occurs in terms of the \(p_{i} \mathrm{~S}\), and do the same for the probability that at least two of the events occur.

Short Answer

Expert verified
At least one: \(1 - (1-p_1)(1-p_2)(1-p_3)(1-p_4)\). At least two: \(1 - (\sum_{i=1}^{4} P(\text{exactly } A_i)) - (1-p_1)(1-p_2)(1-p_3)(1-p_4)\)."

Step by step solution

01

Probability of At Least One Event Occurring

We want to find the probability that at least one of the four events \(A_1, A_2, A_3, A_4\) occurs. To do this, we use the complement rule: the probability that at least one event occurs is equal to 1 minus the probability that none of the events occur. For four independent events, the probability that none occur is the product of their individual probabilities not occurring: \[ P(A_1^c \cap A_2^c \cap A_3^c \cap A_4^c) = (1 - p_1)(1 - p_2)(1 - p_3)(1 - p_4) \]Thus, the probability that at least one event occurs is: \[ P(\text{at least one } A_i) = 1 - (1 - p_1)(1 - p_2)(1 - p_3)(1 - p_4) \]
02

Probability of At Least Two Events Occurring

To compute the probability of at least two of the events occurring, we can first calculate the probability of zero or one event occurring, and then subtract this from 1. From Step 1, we already have the probability of zero events occurring. Now, calculate the probability of exactly one event occurring and subtract both from 1. This requires considering each event occurring while the others do not, summed over all events:\[ P(\text{exactly one } A_i) = p_1(1-p_2)(1-p_3)(1-p_4) + (1-p_1)p_2(1-p_3)(1-p_4) + (1-p_1)(1-p_2)p_3(1-p_4) + (1-p_1)(1-p_2)(1-p_3)p_4 \]Thus, the probability that at least two events occur is:\[ P(\text{at least two } A_i) = 1 - (1 - p_1)(1 - p_2)(1 - p_3)(1 - p_4) - \left(p_1(1-p_2)(1-p_3)(1-p_4) + (1-p_1)p_2(1-p_3)(1-p_4) + (1-p_1)(1-p_2)p_3(1-p_4) + (1-p_1)(1-p_2)(1-p_3)p_4 \right) \]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Independent Events
When dealing with probabilities, understanding independent events is crucial. Events are considered independent if the occurrence of one does not affect the probability of the other occurring. For example, tossing a coin and rolling a die are independent events because the outcome of the coin toss does not influence the result on the die.
Independent events have a special characteristic: the joint probability of all events occurring can be calculated by multiplying their individual probabilities. If you have events like \(A_1\), \(A_2\), \(A_3\), and \(A_4\), and they are all independent, you calculate the probability of all of them happening together by multiplying their individual probabilities like this: \[P(A_1 \cap A_2 \cap A_3 \cap A_4) = P(A_1) \times P(A_2) \times P(A_3) \times P(A_4)\]
This property of multiplication for independent events is extremely useful in determining more complex probabilities, especially when involving complements or multiple events.
Probability Complement
The complement rule is a fundamental concept in probability, often used to simplify calculations. It states that the probability of the complement of an event happening (the event not occurring) is equal to one minus the probability of the event itself. For any event \(A\), the complement is denoted as \(A^c\), and its probability is given by the equation:
\[P(A^c) = 1 - P(A)\]
This formula is especially helpful when it is easier to calculate the probability of an event not happening.
When dealing with multiple independent events such as \(A_1, A_2, A_3,\) and \(A_4\), you can find the probability of none occurring by using their complements. For example, to find the probability that none of these events occur, you calculate:
\[P(A_1^c \cap A_2^c \cap A_3^c \cap A_4^c) = (1 - P(A_1))(1 - P(A_2))(1 - P(A_3))(1 - P(A_4))\]
Once this probability has been determined, finding out how likely it is for at least one event to occur becomes straightforward by applying the complement rule.
At Least One
The phrase "at least one" often appears in probability questions and can sometimes seem tricky. Luckily, there's a methodical way to handle it. The probability of at least one event occurring can more easily be found using its complement—none of the events occurring.
For instance, consider four independent events \(A_1, A_2, A_3,\) and \(A_4\). The probability that at least one happens is calculated as the complement of the probability that none occur:
\[P(\text{at least one } A_i) = 1 - P(A_1^c \cap A_2^c \cap A_3^c \cap A_4^c)\]
This simplifies your work by allowing you to focus on the non-occurrence of events, and then merely subtracting from 1. In our example, this becomes:
\[P(\text{at least one } A_i) = 1 - (1 - p_1)(1 - p_2)(1 - p_3)(1 - p_4)\]
So, the complement method is a convenient tool in probability, especially for "at least one" scenarios.
Probability Calculations
Computing complex probabilities often involves breaking them into simpler component calculations. When we need to calculate the probability of events such as "at least two occurring," we consider zero or one event occurring as a way to simplify.
First, calculate the probability of none of the events occurring, then expand to calculate the probability of exactly one occurring. To find \(P(\text{exactly one } A_i)\), you sum the probabilities of each individual event happening while the rest do not:
  • \(p_1(1-p_2)(1-p_3)(1-p_4)\)
  • \((1-p_1)p_2(1-p_3)(1-p_4)\)
  • \((1-p_1)(1-p_2)p_3(1-p_4)\)
  • \((1-p_1)(1-p_2)(1-p_3)p_4\)

With these calculations, to find "at least two," you subtract both from 1:\[P(\text{at least two } A_i) = 1 - P(\text{zero}) - P(\text{exactly one })\]
This structured approach allows for more manageable problem-solving when tackling multiple event probabilities.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One method used to distinguish between granitic \((G)\) and basaltic \((B)\) rocks is to examine a portion of the infrared spectrum of the sun's energy reflected from the rock surface. Let \(R_{1}, R_{2}\), and \(R_{3}\) denote measured spectrum intensities at three different wavelengths; typically, for granite \(R_{1}P\) (basalt \(\mid R_{1}<\) \(R_{2}

A personnel manager is to interview four candidates for a job. These are ranked \(1,2,3\), and 4 in order of preference and will be interviewed in random order. However, at the conclusion of each interview, the manager will know only how the current candidate compares to those previously interviewed. For example, the interview order \(3,4,1,2\) generates no information after the first interview, shows that the second candidate is worse than the first, and that the third is better than the first two. However, the order 3 , \(4,2,1\) would generate the same information after each of the first three interviews. The manager wants to hire the best candidate but must make an irrevocable hire/no hire decision after each interview. Consider the following strategy: Automatically reject the first \(s\) candidates and then hire the first subsequent candidate who is best among those already interviewed (if no such candidate appears, the last one interviewed is hired). For example, with \(s=2\), the order \(3,4,1,2\) would result in the best being hired, whereas the order \(3,1,2,4\) would not. Of the four possible \(s\) values \((0,1,2\), and 3\()\), which one maximizes \(P\) (best is hired)?

The computers of six faculty members in a certain department are to be replaced. Two of the faculty members have selected laptop machines and the other four have chosen desktop machines. Suppose that only two of the setups can be done on a particular day, and the two computers to be set up are randomly selected from the six (implying 15 equally likely outcomes; if the computers are numbered \(1,2, \ldots, 6\), then one outcome consists of computers 1 and 2 , another consists of computers 1 and 3 , and so on). a. What is the probability that both selected setups are for laptop computers? b. What is the probability that both selected setups are desktop machines? c. What is the probability that at least one selected setup is for a desktop computer? d. What is the probability that at least one computer of each type is chosen for setup?

A quality control inspector is inspecting newly produced items for faults. The inspector searches an item for faults in a series of independent fixations, each of a fixed duration. Given that a flaw is actually present, let \(p\) denote the probability that the flaw is detected during any one fixation (this model is discussed in "Human Performance in Sampling Inspection," Human Factors, 1979: 99-105). a. Assuming that an item has a flaw, what is the probability that it is detected by the end of the second fixation (once a flaw has been detected, the sequence of fixations terminates)? b. Give an expression for the probability that a flaw will be detected by the end of the \(n\)th fixation. c. If when a flaw has not been detected in three fixations, the item is passed, what is the probability that a flawed item will pass inspection? d. Suppose \(10 \%\) of all items contain a flaw \([P\) (randomly chosen item is flawed) \(=.1]\). With the assumption of part (c), what is the probability that a randomly chosen item will pass inspection (it will automatically pass if it is not flawed, but could also pass if it is flawed)? e. Given that an item has passed inspection (no flaws in three fixations), what is the probability that it is actually flawed? Calculate for \(p=.5\).

Consider the type of clothes dryer (gas or electric) purchased by each of five different customers at a certain store. a. If the probability that at most one of these purchases an electric dryer is \(.428\), what is the probability that at least two purchase an electric dryer? b. If \(P\) (all five purchase gas) \(=.116\) and \(P\) (all five purchase electric) \(=.005\), what is the probability that at least one of each type is purchased?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.